The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes: Results of a Systematic Review
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes : Results of a Systematic Review. / Rocha, Lucia Vazquez; Macdonald, Ian; Alssema, Marjan; Færch, Kristine.
I: Nutrients, Bind 14, Nr. 10, 2036, 2022, s. 1-27.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes
T2 - Results of a Systematic Review
AU - Rocha, Lucia Vazquez
AU - Macdonald, Ian
AU - Alssema, Marjan
AU - Færch, Kristine
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The gold‐standard techniques for measuring insulin sensitivity and secretion are well established. However, they may be perceived as invasive and expensive for use in dietary intervention studies. Thus, surrogate markers have been proposed as alternative markers for insulin sensitivity and secretion. This systematic review aimed to identify markers of insulin sensitivity and secretion in response to dietary intervention and assess their suitability as surrogates for the gold‐standard method-ology. Methods: Three databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched, intervention studies and randomised controlled trials reporting data on dietary intake, a gold standard of analysis of insulin sensitivity (either euglycaemic‐hyperinsulinaemic clamp or intravenous glucose tolerance test and secretion (acute insulin response to glucose), as well as surrogate markers for insulin sensitivity (either fasting insulin, area under the curve oral glucose tolerance tests and HOMA‐IR) and insulin secretion (disposi-tion index), were selected. Results: We identified thirty‐five studies that were eligible for inclusion. We found insufficient evidence to predict insulin sensitivity and secretion with surrogate markers when compared to gold standards in nutritional intervention studies. Conclusions: Future research is needed to investigate if surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion can be repeatable and reproduci-ble in the same way as gold standards.
AB - Background: The gold‐standard techniques for measuring insulin sensitivity and secretion are well established. However, they may be perceived as invasive and expensive for use in dietary intervention studies. Thus, surrogate markers have been proposed as alternative markers for insulin sensitivity and secretion. This systematic review aimed to identify markers of insulin sensitivity and secretion in response to dietary intervention and assess their suitability as surrogates for the gold‐standard method-ology. Methods: Three databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched, intervention studies and randomised controlled trials reporting data on dietary intake, a gold standard of analysis of insulin sensitivity (either euglycaemic‐hyperinsulinaemic clamp or intravenous glucose tolerance test and secretion (acute insulin response to glucose), as well as surrogate markers for insulin sensitivity (either fasting insulin, area under the curve oral glucose tolerance tests and HOMA‐IR) and insulin secretion (disposi-tion index), were selected. Results: We identified thirty‐five studies that were eligible for inclusion. We found insufficient evidence to predict insulin sensitivity and secretion with surrogate markers when compared to gold standards in nutritional intervention studies. Conclusions: Future research is needed to investigate if surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion can be repeatable and reproduci-ble in the same way as gold standards.
KW - dietary intervention studies
KW - gold standard
KW - insulin secretion
KW - insulin sensitivity
KW - surrogate markers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129856455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/nu14102036
DO - 10.3390/nu14102036
M3 - Review
C2 - 35631177
AN - SCOPUS:85129856455
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 27
JO - Nutrients
JF - Nutrients
SN - 2072-6643
IS - 10
M1 - 2036
ER -
ID: 311340219