The politics of boundary-work: Boundary-work as a matter of care

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskning

Standard

The politics of boundary-work : Boundary-work as a matter of care. / Ravn, Louis.

2023. Abstract fra STS Austria 2023.

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskning

Harvard

Ravn, L 2023, 'The politics of boundary-work: Boundary-work as a matter of care', STS Austria 2023, 28/11/2023 - 01/12/2023.

APA

Ravn, L. (2023). The politics of boundary-work: Boundary-work as a matter of care. Abstract fra STS Austria 2023.

Vancouver

Ravn L. The politics of boundary-work: Boundary-work as a matter of care. 2023. Abstract fra STS Austria 2023.

Author

Ravn, Louis. / The politics of boundary-work : Boundary-work as a matter of care. Abstract fra STS Austria 2023.

Bibtex

@conference{734bce57b5da4b2ba86d9680228495f1,
title = "The politics of boundary-work: Boundary-work as a matter of care",
abstract = "The concept of boundary-work (Gieryn, 1983), denoting the rhetorical work which variably demarcates science from non-science, has long been a fruitful concept within STS. While its initial theorization neglected the role of power differentials, recent empirical research demonstrates that the performativity of boundary-work depends on positionality (Pereira, 2019). Against this backdrop,this paper advances a reconceptualization of boundary-work as a matter of care (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2011). The now rich body of STS theory proposing to understand researchers{\textquoteright} world-making practices as matters of care highlights that scholarly engagements with technoscientific worlds are inherently fragile and affectively charged. As such, STS concepts, such as boundary-work, are potentially, but never certainly, at the disposal of researchers engaging in activism and politics.Thinking through boundary-work as a matter of care allows a renewed conceptualization in terms of three central tenets. First, boundary-work can be seen as continually enacting, attuning us to the practice{\textquoteright}s continuity, its possibilities for change, and attendant ontological politics. Second, boundary-work emerges as locally situated, thus directing attention to its embodied situatedness and the imperative to listen to marginalized voices. Lastly, boundary-work becomes affectively charged as it potentially creates and excludes connections, is always steeped in historically grown power relations,and necessitates response-ability in its enactments.This renewed concept of boundary-work as a matter of care foregrounds the politics of boundary-work by highlighting the onto-epistemological entanglements (Barad, 2007) into which STS scholars enter, thus providing the basis for a discussion of and reflexivity about them. By rethinking the crucialSTS concept of boundary-work as a matter of care, this paper contributes to discussing and coming to terms with the politics of STS.",
author = "Louis Ravn",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "29",
language = "English",
note = "STS Austria 2023 ; Conference date: 28-11-2023 Through 01-12-2023",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - The politics of boundary-work

T2 - STS Austria 2023

AU - Ravn, Louis

PY - 2023/11/29

Y1 - 2023/11/29

N2 - The concept of boundary-work (Gieryn, 1983), denoting the rhetorical work which variably demarcates science from non-science, has long been a fruitful concept within STS. While its initial theorization neglected the role of power differentials, recent empirical research demonstrates that the performativity of boundary-work depends on positionality (Pereira, 2019). Against this backdrop,this paper advances a reconceptualization of boundary-work as a matter of care (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2011). The now rich body of STS theory proposing to understand researchers’ world-making practices as matters of care highlights that scholarly engagements with technoscientific worlds are inherently fragile and affectively charged. As such, STS concepts, such as boundary-work, are potentially, but never certainly, at the disposal of researchers engaging in activism and politics.Thinking through boundary-work as a matter of care allows a renewed conceptualization in terms of three central tenets. First, boundary-work can be seen as continually enacting, attuning us to the practice’s continuity, its possibilities for change, and attendant ontological politics. Second, boundary-work emerges as locally situated, thus directing attention to its embodied situatedness and the imperative to listen to marginalized voices. Lastly, boundary-work becomes affectively charged as it potentially creates and excludes connections, is always steeped in historically grown power relations,and necessitates response-ability in its enactments.This renewed concept of boundary-work as a matter of care foregrounds the politics of boundary-work by highlighting the onto-epistemological entanglements (Barad, 2007) into which STS scholars enter, thus providing the basis for a discussion of and reflexivity about them. By rethinking the crucialSTS concept of boundary-work as a matter of care, this paper contributes to discussing and coming to terms with the politics of STS.

AB - The concept of boundary-work (Gieryn, 1983), denoting the rhetorical work which variably demarcates science from non-science, has long been a fruitful concept within STS. While its initial theorization neglected the role of power differentials, recent empirical research demonstrates that the performativity of boundary-work depends on positionality (Pereira, 2019). Against this backdrop,this paper advances a reconceptualization of boundary-work as a matter of care (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2011). The now rich body of STS theory proposing to understand researchers’ world-making practices as matters of care highlights that scholarly engagements with technoscientific worlds are inherently fragile and affectively charged. As such, STS concepts, such as boundary-work, are potentially, but never certainly, at the disposal of researchers engaging in activism and politics.Thinking through boundary-work as a matter of care allows a renewed conceptualization in terms of three central tenets. First, boundary-work can be seen as continually enacting, attuning us to the practice’s continuity, its possibilities for change, and attendant ontological politics. Second, boundary-work emerges as locally situated, thus directing attention to its embodied situatedness and the imperative to listen to marginalized voices. Lastly, boundary-work becomes affectively charged as it potentially creates and excludes connections, is always steeped in historically grown power relations,and necessitates response-ability in its enactments.This renewed concept of boundary-work as a matter of care foregrounds the politics of boundary-work by highlighting the onto-epistemological entanglements (Barad, 2007) into which STS scholars enter, thus providing the basis for a discussion of and reflexivity about them. By rethinking the crucialSTS concept of boundary-work as a matter of care, this paper contributes to discussing and coming to terms with the politics of STS.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 28 November 2023 through 1 December 2023

ER -

ID: 383391659