The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis. / Caserta, Salvatore; Cebulak, Pola.
I: International Journal of Law in Context, Bind 14, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 275-293.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis
AU - Caserta, Salvatore
AU - Cebulak, Pola
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The article compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional level. These four judicial bodies of the European Union, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case studies from across the globe, the article identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the member states, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the prize of achieving only a narrow authority.
AB - The article compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional level. These four judicial bodies of the European Union, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case studies from across the globe, the article identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the member states, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the prize of achieving only a narrow authority.
U2 - 10.1017/S1744552318000071
DO - 10.1017/S1744552318000071
M3 - Journal article
VL - 14
SP - 275
EP - 293
JO - International Journal of Law in Context
JF - International Journal of Law in Context
SN - 1744-5523
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 192113630