The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. / Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz; Fryzek, Jon P; Kjøller, Kim; Breiting, Vibeke Bro; Jørgensen, Anna; Krag, Christen; McLaughlin, Joseph K.

I: Annals of Plastic Surgery, Bind 54, Nr. 6, 01.06.2005, s. 583-9.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hölmich, LR, Fryzek, JP, Kjøller, K, Breiting, VB, Jørgensen, A, Krag, C & McLaughlin, JK 2005, 'The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging', Annals of Plastic Surgery, bind 54, nr. 6, s. 583-9.

APA

Hölmich, L. R., Fryzek, J. P., Kjøller, K., Breiting, V. B., Jørgensen, A., Krag, C., & McLaughlin, J. K. (2005). The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 54(6), 583-9.

Vancouver

Hölmich LR, Fryzek JP, Kjøller K, Breiting VB, Jørgensen A, Krag C o.a. The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2005 jun. 1;54(6):583-9.

Author

Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz ; Fryzek, Jon P ; Kjøller, Kim ; Breiting, Vibeke Bro ; Jørgensen, Anna ; Krag, Christen ; McLaughlin, Joseph K. / The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. I: Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2005 ; Bind 54, Nr. 6. s. 583-9.

Bibtex

@article{343a3723175a4df79581ad43bbcf5d7e,
title = "The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging",
abstract = "The objective was to evaluate the usefulness of clinical examination in the evaluation of breast-implant integrity, using the diagnosis at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the {"}gold standard.{"} Fifty-five women with 109 implants underwent a breast examination either just before or shortly after an MRI examination. Twenty-four of 109 implants were clinically diagnosed with possible rupture or rupture. Eighteen of the 24 implants were ruptured according to the MRI examination (75%). Eighty-five implants were clinically classified as intact, and 43 of these were actually ruptured at MRI (51%). The sensitivity of the clinical examination for diagnosing rupture was thus 30% and the specificity 88%. The positive predictive value of a clinical diagnosis of rupture was 75%, and the negative predictive value was 49%. In this study, we found that when a clinical examination is used as the sole diagnostic tool to identify implant rupture, neither the sensitivity nor the specificity is acceptable.",
author = "H{\"o}lmich, {Lisbet Rosenkrantz} and Fryzek, {Jon P} and Kim Kj{\o}ller and Breiting, {Vibeke Bro} and Anna J{\o}rgensen and Christen Krag and McLaughlin, {Joseph K}",
year = "2005",
month = jun,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "583--9",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging

AU - Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz

AU - Fryzek, Jon P

AU - Kjøller, Kim

AU - Breiting, Vibeke Bro

AU - Jørgensen, Anna

AU - Krag, Christen

AU - McLaughlin, Joseph K

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - The objective was to evaluate the usefulness of clinical examination in the evaluation of breast-implant integrity, using the diagnosis at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the "gold standard." Fifty-five women with 109 implants underwent a breast examination either just before or shortly after an MRI examination. Twenty-four of 109 implants were clinically diagnosed with possible rupture or rupture. Eighteen of the 24 implants were ruptured according to the MRI examination (75%). Eighty-five implants were clinically classified as intact, and 43 of these were actually ruptured at MRI (51%). The sensitivity of the clinical examination for diagnosing rupture was thus 30% and the specificity 88%. The positive predictive value of a clinical diagnosis of rupture was 75%, and the negative predictive value was 49%. In this study, we found that when a clinical examination is used as the sole diagnostic tool to identify implant rupture, neither the sensitivity nor the specificity is acceptable.

AB - The objective was to evaluate the usefulness of clinical examination in the evaluation of breast-implant integrity, using the diagnosis at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the "gold standard." Fifty-five women with 109 implants underwent a breast examination either just before or shortly after an MRI examination. Twenty-four of 109 implants were clinically diagnosed with possible rupture or rupture. Eighteen of the 24 implants were ruptured according to the MRI examination (75%). Eighty-five implants were clinically classified as intact, and 43 of these were actually ruptured at MRI (51%). The sensitivity of the clinical examination for diagnosing rupture was thus 30% and the specificity 88%. The positive predictive value of a clinical diagnosis of rupture was 75%, and the negative predictive value was 49%. In this study, we found that when a clinical examination is used as the sole diagnostic tool to identify implant rupture, neither the sensitivity nor the specificity is acceptable.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 54

SP - 583

EP - 589

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 40172043