The current gold standard breast volumetry technique seems to overestimate fat graft volume retention in the breast: A validation study
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The current gold standard breast volumetry technique seems to overestimate fat graft volume retention in the breast : A validation study. / Herly, Mikkel; Müller, Felix Christoph; Ørholt, Mathias; Hansen, Joachim; Sværke, Sophie; Hemmingsen, Mathilde N; Rasmussen, Bo S; Elberg, Jens J; Drzewiecki, Krzysztof T; Vester-Glowinski, Peter V.
I: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Print Edition), Bind 72, Nr. 8, 2019, s. 1278-1284.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The current gold standard breast volumetry technique seems to overestimate fat graft volume retention in the breast
T2 - A validation study
AU - Herly, Mikkel
AU - Müller, Felix Christoph
AU - Ørholt, Mathias
AU - Hansen, Joachim
AU - Sværke, Sophie
AU - Hemmingsen, Mathilde N
AU - Rasmussen, Bo S
AU - Elberg, Jens J
AU - Drzewiecki, Krzysztof T
AU - Vester-Glowinski, Peter V
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: MRI is generally considered as the gold standard for measuring breast volume because of its high accuracy of the modality. Many techniques used to measure total breast volume have been validated, but none of these techniques have been validated for their ability to measure the volume retention of fat grafts in the breast. In this study, the authors investigated the accuracy of the most common MRI technique used to measure fat graft retention in the breast by measuring the volume changes after breast augmentation.METHODS: Patients undergoing breast augmentation with either breast implants or fat grafting underwent MRI scans before and after surgery. Blinded observers measured the change in breast volume from the MRI scans. The difference between the measured change in breast volume and the volume of the breast augmentation was used to determine the accuracy of the MRI technique.RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with a total of 56 breasts were included. In total, 168 measurements of change in breast volume were performed by the observers. The MRI measurements of change in breast volume overestimated the true volumes of the breast augmentations by an average of 50.8%, and only 8 of the 168 individual measurements had measurement errors below 50 mL.CONCLUSION: The MRI technique, which is considered as the gold standard for the quantification of fat graft volume retention, was associated with a significant measurement error. These findings have potential implications for the interpretation of previously published results of studies based on this technique.
AB - BACKGROUND: MRI is generally considered as the gold standard for measuring breast volume because of its high accuracy of the modality. Many techniques used to measure total breast volume have been validated, but none of these techniques have been validated for their ability to measure the volume retention of fat grafts in the breast. In this study, the authors investigated the accuracy of the most common MRI technique used to measure fat graft retention in the breast by measuring the volume changes after breast augmentation.METHODS: Patients undergoing breast augmentation with either breast implants or fat grafting underwent MRI scans before and after surgery. Blinded observers measured the change in breast volume from the MRI scans. The difference between the measured change in breast volume and the volume of the breast augmentation was used to determine the accuracy of the MRI technique.RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with a total of 56 breasts were included. In total, 168 measurements of change in breast volume were performed by the observers. The MRI measurements of change in breast volume overestimated the true volumes of the breast augmentations by an average of 50.8%, and only 8 of the 168 individual measurements had measurement errors below 50 mL.CONCLUSION: The MRI technique, which is considered as the gold standard for the quantification of fat graft volume retention, was associated with a significant measurement error. These findings have potential implications for the interpretation of previously published results of studies based on this technique.
KW - Adipose Tissue/transplantation
KW - Adult
KW - Breast/anatomy & histology
KW - Breast Implantation
KW - Breast Implants
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards
KW - Mammaplasty/methods
KW - Observer Variation
KW - Organ Size
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.029
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.029
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31029582
VL - 72
SP - 1278
EP - 1284
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Print Edition)
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Print Edition)
SN - 1748-6815
IS - 8
ER -
ID: 241842216