Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments : the unmet needs. / Tfelt-Hansen, Peer; Olesen, Jes.

I: C N S Drugs, Bind 26, Nr. 5, 2012, s. 375-82.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tfelt-Hansen, P & Olesen, J 2012, 'Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs', C N S Drugs, bind 26, nr. 5, s. 375-82. https://doi.org/10.2165/11630590-000000000-00000

APA

Tfelt-Hansen, P., & Olesen, J. (2012). Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs. C N S Drugs, 26(5), 375-82. https://doi.org/10.2165/11630590-000000000-00000

Vancouver

Tfelt-Hansen P, Olesen J. Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs. C N S Drugs. 2012;26(5):375-82. https://doi.org/10.2165/11630590-000000000-00000

Author

Tfelt-Hansen, Peer ; Olesen, Jes. / Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments : the unmet needs. I: C N S Drugs. 2012 ; Bind 26, Nr. 5. s. 375-82.

Bibtex

@article{d6ff9fe5738944bd9591028f0f25566b,
title = "Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs",
abstract = "Acute migraine treatment is given to abolish ongoing attacks, while prophylactic migraine treatment is given on a daily basis to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks as far as possible. The majority of migraine patients do not use the specific acute anti-migraine drugs, the triptans. Thus, only 10% (Denmark) to 35% (France) of migraine patients use triptans. This is most likely due to relatively low efficacy. Thus, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pain freedom after 2 hours ranges from 12% (frovatriptan 2.5¿mg) to 40% (rizatriptan 10¿mg). For prophylactic treatment (propranolol, valproate, topiramate) a response (at least a 50% reduction in migraine frequency) is observed in 40-50%. In addition, prophylactic treatment is hampered by adverse events and withdrawals. There is a need for new acute anti-migraine drugs and targets are already available and there are more to come. It has been estimated that approximately 2% of the adult population need prophylactic treatment because of frequent migraine attacks. For prophylactic migraine drugs there is an even greater need for new drugs than for acute drug treatment.",
author = "Peer Tfelt-Hansen and Jes Olesen",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.2165/11630590-000000000-00000",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "375--82",
journal = "CNS Drugs",
issn = "1172-7047",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments

T2 - the unmet needs

AU - Tfelt-Hansen, Peer

AU - Olesen, Jes

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Acute migraine treatment is given to abolish ongoing attacks, while prophylactic migraine treatment is given on a daily basis to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks as far as possible. The majority of migraine patients do not use the specific acute anti-migraine drugs, the triptans. Thus, only 10% (Denmark) to 35% (France) of migraine patients use triptans. This is most likely due to relatively low efficacy. Thus, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pain freedom after 2 hours ranges from 12% (frovatriptan 2.5¿mg) to 40% (rizatriptan 10¿mg). For prophylactic treatment (propranolol, valproate, topiramate) a response (at least a 50% reduction in migraine frequency) is observed in 40-50%. In addition, prophylactic treatment is hampered by adverse events and withdrawals. There is a need for new acute anti-migraine drugs and targets are already available and there are more to come. It has been estimated that approximately 2% of the adult population need prophylactic treatment because of frequent migraine attacks. For prophylactic migraine drugs there is an even greater need for new drugs than for acute drug treatment.

AB - Acute migraine treatment is given to abolish ongoing attacks, while prophylactic migraine treatment is given on a daily basis to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks as far as possible. The majority of migraine patients do not use the specific acute anti-migraine drugs, the triptans. Thus, only 10% (Denmark) to 35% (France) of migraine patients use triptans. This is most likely due to relatively low efficacy. Thus, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pain freedom after 2 hours ranges from 12% (frovatriptan 2.5¿mg) to 40% (rizatriptan 10¿mg). For prophylactic treatment (propranolol, valproate, topiramate) a response (at least a 50% reduction in migraine frequency) is observed in 40-50%. In addition, prophylactic treatment is hampered by adverse events and withdrawals. There is a need for new acute anti-migraine drugs and targets are already available and there are more to come. It has been estimated that approximately 2% of the adult population need prophylactic treatment because of frequent migraine attacks. For prophylactic migraine drugs there is an even greater need for new drugs than for acute drug treatment.

U2 - 10.2165/11630590-000000000-00000

DO - 10.2165/11630590-000000000-00000

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22519921

VL - 26

SP - 375

EP - 382

JO - CNS Drugs

JF - CNS Drugs

SN - 1172-7047

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 40186348