Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome : a scoping review. / Peters, Scott; Laing, Alisha; Emerson, Courtney; Mutchler, Kelsey; Joyce, Thomas; Thorborg, Kristian; Hölmich, Per; Reiman, Michael.

I: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Bind 51, 11.2017, s. 1605-1610.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Peters, S, Laing, A, Emerson, C, Mutchler, K, Joyce, T, Thorborg, K, Hölmich, P & Reiman, M 2017, 'Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review', British Journal of Sports Medicine, bind 51, s. 1605-1610. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096936

APA

Peters, S., Laing, A., Emerson, C., Mutchler, K., Joyce, T., Thorborg, K., Hölmich, P., & Reiman, M. (2017). Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51, 1605-1610. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096936

Vancouver

Peters S, Laing A, Emerson C, Mutchler K, Joyce T, Thorborg K o.a. Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017 nov.;51:1605-1610. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096936

Author

Peters, Scott ; Laing, Alisha ; Emerson, Courtney ; Mutchler, Kelsey ; Joyce, Thomas ; Thorborg, Kristian ; Hölmich, Per ; Reiman, Michael. / Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome : a scoping review. I: British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017 ; Bind 51. s. 1605-1610.

Bibtex

@article{9cee0ef947364ee6b46d99cbb3c7c295,
title = "Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to analyse and report criteria used for open and arthroscopic surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).METHODS: A librarian-assisted computer search of Medline, CINAHL and Embase for studies related to criterion for FAIS surgery was used in this study. Inclusion criteria included studies with the primary purpose of surgery or surgical outcomes for treatment of FAIS with and without labral tear, and reporting criteria for FAIS surgery.RESULTS: Diagnostic imaging was a criterion for surgery in 92% of the included studies, with alpha angle the most frequently reported (68% of studies) criterion. Reporting of symptoms was a criterion for surgery in 75%, and special tests a criterion in 70% of studies. Range-of-motion limitations were only a required criterion in 30%, only 12% of studies required intra-articular injection and 44% of studies described previously failed treatment (non-surgical or physiotherapist-led rehabilitation) as a criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging combined for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting.CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging evidence of FAIS was the most commonly reported criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting, and only 44% of studies had failed non-surgical treatment (and 18% a failed trial of physiotherapy) as a criterion for surgery.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "Scott Peters and Alisha Laing and Courtney Emerson and Kelsey Mutchler and Thomas Joyce and Kristian Thorborg and Per H{\"o}lmich and Michael Reiman",
note = "{\textcopyright} Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2016-096936",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1605--1610",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "B M J Group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

T2 - a scoping review

AU - Peters, Scott

AU - Laing, Alisha

AU - Emerson, Courtney

AU - Mutchler, Kelsey

AU - Joyce, Thomas

AU - Thorborg, Kristian

AU - Hölmich, Per

AU - Reiman, Michael

N1 - © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to analyse and report criteria used for open and arthroscopic surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).METHODS: A librarian-assisted computer search of Medline, CINAHL and Embase for studies related to criterion for FAIS surgery was used in this study. Inclusion criteria included studies with the primary purpose of surgery or surgical outcomes for treatment of FAIS with and without labral tear, and reporting criteria for FAIS surgery.RESULTS: Diagnostic imaging was a criterion for surgery in 92% of the included studies, with alpha angle the most frequently reported (68% of studies) criterion. Reporting of symptoms was a criterion for surgery in 75%, and special tests a criterion in 70% of studies. Range-of-motion limitations were only a required criterion in 30%, only 12% of studies required intra-articular injection and 44% of studies described previously failed treatment (non-surgical or physiotherapist-led rehabilitation) as a criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging combined for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting.CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging evidence of FAIS was the most commonly reported criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting, and only 44% of studies had failed non-surgical treatment (and 18% a failed trial of physiotherapy) as a criterion for surgery.

AB - BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to analyse and report criteria used for open and arthroscopic surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).METHODS: A librarian-assisted computer search of Medline, CINAHL and Embase for studies related to criterion for FAIS surgery was used in this study. Inclusion criteria included studies with the primary purpose of surgery or surgical outcomes for treatment of FAIS with and without labral tear, and reporting criteria for FAIS surgery.RESULTS: Diagnostic imaging was a criterion for surgery in 92% of the included studies, with alpha angle the most frequently reported (68% of studies) criterion. Reporting of symptoms was a criterion for surgery in 75%, and special tests a criterion in 70% of studies. Range-of-motion limitations were only a required criterion in 30%, only 12% of studies required intra-articular injection and 44% of studies described previously failed treatment (non-surgical or physiotherapist-led rehabilitation) as a criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging combined for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting.CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging evidence of FAIS was the most commonly reported criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting, and only 44% of studies had failed non-surgical treatment (and 18% a failed trial of physiotherapy) as a criterion for surgery.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096936

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096936

M3 - Review

C2 - 28219940

VL - 51

SP - 1605

EP - 1610

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

ER -

ID: 184674244