Self-Disorders: Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Self-Disorders : Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia. / Parnas, Josef; Jansson, Lennart B.

I: Psychopathology, Bind 48, Nr. 5, 2015, s. 332-8.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Parnas, J & Jansson, LB 2015, 'Self-Disorders: Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia', Psychopathology, bind 48, nr. 5, s. 332-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437232

APA

Parnas, J., & Jansson, L. B. (2015). Self-Disorders: Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia. Psychopathology, 48(5), 332-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437232

Vancouver

Parnas J, Jansson LB. Self-Disorders: Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia. Psychopathology. 2015;48(5):332-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437232

Author

Parnas, Josef ; Jansson, Lennart B. / Self-Disorders : Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia. I: Psychopathology. 2015 ; Bind 48, Nr. 5. s. 332-8.

Bibtex

@article{c172888a2fa44abf83ced442791a647e,
title = "Self-Disorders: Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia",
abstract = "The release of DSM-5 and the preparations for the launch of the ICD-11 provoked a series of critiques of psychiatric classification, which continues to depend largely on clinical description. Among the immediate problems are those of arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, tendency to reification, rigid category boundaries, comorbidity, diagnostic 'epidemics' and differential diagnostic dilemmas. We argue that many of those problems stem from the polythetic-operational definitions of psychiatric categories, which thereby come to lack an organizing prototype-directed or gestaltic intelligibility principle. We illustrate these issues by briefly examining the current operational diagnosis of schizophrenia, its demarcation from affective illness and the status of the spectrum concept and the prodrome of schizophrenia. We point out that European research on schizophrenia always allocated an important diagnostic weight to a certain prototypical trait core of the illness, phenomenologically indispensable for its demarcation from other, nonschizophrenic psychotic conditions. We believe that the notion of self-disorder (reflective of the structural alterations of subjectivity), itemized into its various aspects in the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience scale, is an important step forward in a more precise psychopathological articulation of that core, strengthening its clinical and research utility.",
keywords = "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Gestalt Theory, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept",
author = "Josef Parnas and Jansson, {Lennart B}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1159/000437232",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "332--8",
journal = "Psychopathology",
issn = "0254-4962",
publisher = "S Karger AG",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Disorders

T2 - Clinical and Conceptual Implications for the Diagnostic Concept of Schizophrenia

AU - Parnas, Josef

AU - Jansson, Lennart B

N1 - © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The release of DSM-5 and the preparations for the launch of the ICD-11 provoked a series of critiques of psychiatric classification, which continues to depend largely on clinical description. Among the immediate problems are those of arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, tendency to reification, rigid category boundaries, comorbidity, diagnostic 'epidemics' and differential diagnostic dilemmas. We argue that many of those problems stem from the polythetic-operational definitions of psychiatric categories, which thereby come to lack an organizing prototype-directed or gestaltic intelligibility principle. We illustrate these issues by briefly examining the current operational diagnosis of schizophrenia, its demarcation from affective illness and the status of the spectrum concept and the prodrome of schizophrenia. We point out that European research on schizophrenia always allocated an important diagnostic weight to a certain prototypical trait core of the illness, phenomenologically indispensable for its demarcation from other, nonschizophrenic psychotic conditions. We believe that the notion of self-disorder (reflective of the structural alterations of subjectivity), itemized into its various aspects in the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience scale, is an important step forward in a more precise psychopathological articulation of that core, strengthening its clinical and research utility.

AB - The release of DSM-5 and the preparations for the launch of the ICD-11 provoked a series of critiques of psychiatric classification, which continues to depend largely on clinical description. Among the immediate problems are those of arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, tendency to reification, rigid category boundaries, comorbidity, diagnostic 'epidemics' and differential diagnostic dilemmas. We argue that many of those problems stem from the polythetic-operational definitions of psychiatric categories, which thereby come to lack an organizing prototype-directed or gestaltic intelligibility principle. We illustrate these issues by briefly examining the current operational diagnosis of schizophrenia, its demarcation from affective illness and the status of the spectrum concept and the prodrome of schizophrenia. We point out that European research on schizophrenia always allocated an important diagnostic weight to a certain prototypical trait core of the illness, phenomenologically indispensable for its demarcation from other, nonschizophrenic psychotic conditions. We believe that the notion of self-disorder (reflective of the structural alterations of subjectivity), itemized into its various aspects in the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience scale, is an important step forward in a more precise psychopathological articulation of that core, strengthening its clinical and research utility.

KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

KW - Gestalt Theory

KW - Humans

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Schizophrenic Psychology

KW - Self Concept

U2 - 10.1159/000437232

DO - 10.1159/000437232

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26346370

VL - 48

SP - 332

EP - 338

JO - Psychopathology

JF - Psychopathology

SN - 0254-4962

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 162112766