Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: A prospective double-blind randomized study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap : A prospective double-blind randomized study. / Brunbjerg, Mette Eline; Jensen, Thomas Bo; Christiansen, Peer; Overgaard, Jens; Engberg Damsgaard, Tine.

I: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Bind 55, Nr. 4, 2021, s. 202-209.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Brunbjerg, ME, Jensen, TB, Christiansen, P, Overgaard, J & Engberg Damsgaard, T 2021, 'Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: A prospective double-blind randomized study', Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, bind 55, nr. 4, s. 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673

APA

Brunbjerg, M. E., Jensen, T. B., Christiansen, P., Overgaard, J., & Engberg Damsgaard, T. (2021). Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: A prospective double-blind randomized study. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 55(4), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673

Vancouver

Brunbjerg ME, Jensen TB, Christiansen P, Overgaard J, Engberg Damsgaard T. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: A prospective double-blind randomized study. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2021;55(4):202-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673

Author

Brunbjerg, Mette Eline ; Jensen, Thomas Bo ; Christiansen, Peer ; Overgaard, Jens ; Engberg Damsgaard, Tine. / Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap : A prospective double-blind randomized study. I: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2021 ; Bind 55, Nr. 4. s. 202-209.

Bibtex

@article{ac1d1d23593444858101759cc4c12c89,
title = "Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: A prospective double-blind randomized study",
abstract = "Introduction: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (p-TRAM) is a well-established option for autologous breast reconstruction (BR) but donor-site morbidity is still reported. The aim of the present study was to compare donor-site morbidity after reinforcement of the abdominal wall regarding development of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, and abdominal pain hypothesizing, that reinforcement with acellular dermal matrix (Strattice{\texttrademark}) is superior to reinforcement with synthetic mesh (Prolene{\textregistered}). Materials and methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study was conducted with 29 patients admitted for BR with the p-TRAM flap at Department of Plastic Surgery, AUH, Denmark, 2014–2016. Allocation rate 1:1. Follow-up at 4, 12, and 24 months. Results: 24 months postoperatively the computerized tomography verified bulging frequency was 35.7% in the ADM group and 6.7% in the synthetic mesh group (p = 0.11). Two patients (14.3%) in the ADM group and no patients in the synthetic mesh group developed hernia. No significant difference between baseline and 2-year measurement of abdominal muscle strength was observed. Conclusion: The present study did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between treatment groups regarding risk of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, pain or pain related QoL within two years of follow-up. Although the small sample size sets limitations for drawing wide conclusions the hypothesis that reinforcement with ADM is superior to synthetic mesh cannot be confirmed. Further research into methods for decreasing donor-side morbidity related to the TRAM flap or other rectus abdominis muscle-based flaps is needed.",
keywords = "ADM, Breast reconstruction, complication, donor-site morbidity, pedicled TRAM flap, rectus abdominis muscle-based flap, synthetic mesh",
author = "Brunbjerg, {Mette Eline} and Jensen, {Thomas Bo} and Peer Christiansen and Jens Overgaard and {Engberg Damsgaard}, Tine",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "202--209",
journal = "Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery",
issn = "2000-656X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap

T2 - A prospective double-blind randomized study

AU - Brunbjerg, Mette Eline

AU - Jensen, Thomas Bo

AU - Christiansen, Peer

AU - Overgaard, Jens

AU - Engberg Damsgaard, Tine

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Introduction: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (p-TRAM) is a well-established option for autologous breast reconstruction (BR) but donor-site morbidity is still reported. The aim of the present study was to compare donor-site morbidity after reinforcement of the abdominal wall regarding development of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, and abdominal pain hypothesizing, that reinforcement with acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) is superior to reinforcement with synthetic mesh (Prolene®). Materials and methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study was conducted with 29 patients admitted for BR with the p-TRAM flap at Department of Plastic Surgery, AUH, Denmark, 2014–2016. Allocation rate 1:1. Follow-up at 4, 12, and 24 months. Results: 24 months postoperatively the computerized tomography verified bulging frequency was 35.7% in the ADM group and 6.7% in the synthetic mesh group (p = 0.11). Two patients (14.3%) in the ADM group and no patients in the synthetic mesh group developed hernia. No significant difference between baseline and 2-year measurement of abdominal muscle strength was observed. Conclusion: The present study did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between treatment groups regarding risk of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, pain or pain related QoL within two years of follow-up. Although the small sample size sets limitations for drawing wide conclusions the hypothesis that reinforcement with ADM is superior to synthetic mesh cannot be confirmed. Further research into methods for decreasing donor-side morbidity related to the TRAM flap or other rectus abdominis muscle-based flaps is needed.

AB - Introduction: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (p-TRAM) is a well-established option for autologous breast reconstruction (BR) but donor-site morbidity is still reported. The aim of the present study was to compare donor-site morbidity after reinforcement of the abdominal wall regarding development of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, and abdominal pain hypothesizing, that reinforcement with acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) is superior to reinforcement with synthetic mesh (Prolene®). Materials and methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study was conducted with 29 patients admitted for BR with the p-TRAM flap at Department of Plastic Surgery, AUH, Denmark, 2014–2016. Allocation rate 1:1. Follow-up at 4, 12, and 24 months. Results: 24 months postoperatively the computerized tomography verified bulging frequency was 35.7% in the ADM group and 6.7% in the synthetic mesh group (p = 0.11). Two patients (14.3%) in the ADM group and no patients in the synthetic mesh group developed hernia. No significant difference between baseline and 2-year measurement of abdominal muscle strength was observed. Conclusion: The present study did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between treatment groups regarding risk of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, pain or pain related QoL within two years of follow-up. Although the small sample size sets limitations for drawing wide conclusions the hypothesis that reinforcement with ADM is superior to synthetic mesh cannot be confirmed. Further research into methods for decreasing donor-side morbidity related to the TRAM flap or other rectus abdominis muscle-based flaps is needed.

KW - ADM

KW - Breast reconstruction

KW - complication

KW - donor-site morbidity

KW - pedicled TRAM flap

KW - rectus abdominis muscle-based flap

KW - synthetic mesh

U2 - 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673

DO - 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33356728

AN - SCOPUS:85098479776

VL - 55

SP - 202

EP - 209

JO - Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

SN - 2000-656X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 301356635