Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: A prospective double-blind randomized study
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap : A prospective double-blind randomized study. / Brunbjerg, Mette Eline; Jensen, Thomas Bo; Christiansen, Peer; Overgaard, Jens; Engberg Damsgaard, Tine.
I: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Bind 55, Nr. 4, 2021, s. 202-209.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap
T2 - A prospective double-blind randomized study
AU - Brunbjerg, Mette Eline
AU - Jensen, Thomas Bo
AU - Christiansen, Peer
AU - Overgaard, Jens
AU - Engberg Damsgaard, Tine
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (p-TRAM) is a well-established option for autologous breast reconstruction (BR) but donor-site morbidity is still reported. The aim of the present study was to compare donor-site morbidity after reinforcement of the abdominal wall regarding development of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, and abdominal pain hypothesizing, that reinforcement with acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) is superior to reinforcement with synthetic mesh (Prolene®). Materials and methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study was conducted with 29 patients admitted for BR with the p-TRAM flap at Department of Plastic Surgery, AUH, Denmark, 2014–2016. Allocation rate 1:1. Follow-up at 4, 12, and 24 months. Results: 24 months postoperatively the computerized tomography verified bulging frequency was 35.7% in the ADM group and 6.7% in the synthetic mesh group (p = 0.11). Two patients (14.3%) in the ADM group and no patients in the synthetic mesh group developed hernia. No significant difference between baseline and 2-year measurement of abdominal muscle strength was observed. Conclusion: The present study did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between treatment groups regarding risk of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, pain or pain related QoL within two years of follow-up. Although the small sample size sets limitations for drawing wide conclusions the hypothesis that reinforcement with ADM is superior to synthetic mesh cannot be confirmed. Further research into methods for decreasing donor-side morbidity related to the TRAM flap or other rectus abdominis muscle-based flaps is needed.
AB - Introduction: The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (p-TRAM) is a well-established option for autologous breast reconstruction (BR) but donor-site morbidity is still reported. The aim of the present study was to compare donor-site morbidity after reinforcement of the abdominal wall regarding development of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, and abdominal pain hypothesizing, that reinforcement with acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) is superior to reinforcement with synthetic mesh (Prolene®). Materials and methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study was conducted with 29 patients admitted for BR with the p-TRAM flap at Department of Plastic Surgery, AUH, Denmark, 2014–2016. Allocation rate 1:1. Follow-up at 4, 12, and 24 months. Results: 24 months postoperatively the computerized tomography verified bulging frequency was 35.7% in the ADM group and 6.7% in the synthetic mesh group (p = 0.11). Two patients (14.3%) in the ADM group and no patients in the synthetic mesh group developed hernia. No significant difference between baseline and 2-year measurement of abdominal muscle strength was observed. Conclusion: The present study did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between treatment groups regarding risk of bulging or hernia, abdominal muscle strength, complications, pain or pain related QoL within two years of follow-up. Although the small sample size sets limitations for drawing wide conclusions the hypothesis that reinforcement with ADM is superior to synthetic mesh cannot be confirmed. Further research into methods for decreasing donor-side morbidity related to the TRAM flap or other rectus abdominis muscle-based flaps is needed.
KW - ADM
KW - Breast reconstruction
KW - complication
KW - donor-site morbidity
KW - pedicled TRAM flap
KW - rectus abdominis muscle-based flap
KW - synthetic mesh
U2 - 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673
DO - 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33356728
AN - SCOPUS:85098479776
VL - 55
SP - 202
EP - 209
JO - Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
SN - 2000-656X
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 301356635