Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI: A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI : A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction. / Slipsager, Jakob M.; Glimberg, Stefan L.; Søgaard, Jes; Paulsen, Rasmus R.; Johannesen, Helle H.; Martens, Pernille C.; Seth, Alka; Marner, Lisbeth; Henriksen, Otto M.; Olesen, Oline V.; Højgaard, Liselotte.

I: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Bind 52, Nr. 3, 2020, s. 731-738.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Slipsager, JM, Glimberg, SL, Søgaard, J, Paulsen, RR, Johannesen, HH, Martens, PC, Seth, A, Marner, L, Henriksen, OM, Olesen, OV & Højgaard, L 2020, 'Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI: A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, bind 52, nr. 3, s. 731-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27112

APA

Slipsager, J. M., Glimberg, S. L., Søgaard, J., Paulsen, R. R., Johannesen, H. H., Martens, P. C., Seth, A., Marner, L., Henriksen, O. M., Olesen, O. V., & Højgaard, L. (2020). Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI: A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 52(3), 731-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27112

Vancouver

Slipsager JM, Glimberg SL, Søgaard J, Paulsen RR, Johannesen HH, Martens PC o.a. Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI: A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020;52(3):731-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27112

Author

Slipsager, Jakob M. ; Glimberg, Stefan L. ; Søgaard, Jes ; Paulsen, Rasmus R. ; Johannesen, Helle H. ; Martens, Pernille C. ; Seth, Alka ; Marner, Lisbeth ; Henriksen, Otto M. ; Olesen, Oline V. ; Højgaard, Liselotte. / Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI : A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction. I: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020 ; Bind 52, Nr. 3. s. 731-738.

Bibtex

@article{27b9201ad4e24e51a7cc25724c536a80,
title = "Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI: A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction",
abstract = "Background: Patient head motion is a major concern in clinical brain MRI, as it reduces the diagnostic image quality and may increase examination time and cost. Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of MR images with significant motion artifacts on a given clinical scanner and to estimate the potential financial cost savings of applying motion correction to clinical brain MRI examinations. Study Type: Retrospective. Subjects: In all, 173 patients undergoing a PET/MRI dementia protocol and 55 pediatric patients undergoing a PET/MRI brain tumor protocol. The total scan time of the two protocols were 17 and 40 minutes, respectively. Field Strength/Sequences: 3 T, Siemens mMR Biograph, MPRAGE, DWI, T1 and T2-weighted FLAIR, T2-weighted 2D-FLASH, T2-weighted TSE. Assessment: A retrospective review of image sequences from a given clinical MRI scanner was conducted to investigate the prevalence of motion-corrupted images. The review was performed by three radiologists with different levels of experience using a three-step semiquantitative scale to classify the quality of the images. A total of 1013 sequences distributed on 228 MRI examinations were reviewed. The potential cost savings of motion correction were estimated by a cost estimation for our country with assumptions. Statistical Test: The cost estimation was conducted with a 20% lower and upper bound on the model assumptions to include the uncertainty of the assumptions. Results: 7.9% of the sequences had motion artifacts that decreased the interpretability, while 2.0% of the sequences had motion artifacts causing the images to be nondiagnostic. The estimated annual cost to the clinic/hospital due to patient head motion per scanner was $45,066 without pediatric examinations and $364,242 with pediatric examinations. Data Conclusion: The prevalence of a motion-corrupted image was found in 2.0% of the reviewed sequences. Based on the model, repayment periods are presented as a function of the price for applying motion correction and its performance. Evidence Level: 4. Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:731–738.",
keywords = "cost saving, motion artifacts, motion correction, MRI, neuroimaging",
author = "Slipsager, {Jakob M.} and Glimberg, {Stefan L.} and Jes S{\o}gaard and Paulsen, {Rasmus R.} and Johannesen, {Helle H.} and Martens, {Pernille C.} and Alka Seth and Lisbeth Marner and Henriksen, {Otto M.} and Olesen, {Oline V.} and Liselotte H{\o}jgaard",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.27112",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "731--738",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the Financial Savings of Motion Correction in Brain MRI

T2 - A Model-Based Estimate of the Costs Arising From Patient Head Motion and Potential Savings From Implementation of Motion Correction

AU - Slipsager, Jakob M.

AU - Glimberg, Stefan L.

AU - Søgaard, Jes

AU - Paulsen, Rasmus R.

AU - Johannesen, Helle H.

AU - Martens, Pernille C.

AU - Seth, Alka

AU - Marner, Lisbeth

AU - Henriksen, Otto M.

AU - Olesen, Oline V.

AU - Højgaard, Liselotte

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Patient head motion is a major concern in clinical brain MRI, as it reduces the diagnostic image quality and may increase examination time and cost. Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of MR images with significant motion artifacts on a given clinical scanner and to estimate the potential financial cost savings of applying motion correction to clinical brain MRI examinations. Study Type: Retrospective. Subjects: In all, 173 patients undergoing a PET/MRI dementia protocol and 55 pediatric patients undergoing a PET/MRI brain tumor protocol. The total scan time of the two protocols were 17 and 40 minutes, respectively. Field Strength/Sequences: 3 T, Siemens mMR Biograph, MPRAGE, DWI, T1 and T2-weighted FLAIR, T2-weighted 2D-FLASH, T2-weighted TSE. Assessment: A retrospective review of image sequences from a given clinical MRI scanner was conducted to investigate the prevalence of motion-corrupted images. The review was performed by three radiologists with different levels of experience using a three-step semiquantitative scale to classify the quality of the images. A total of 1013 sequences distributed on 228 MRI examinations were reviewed. The potential cost savings of motion correction were estimated by a cost estimation for our country with assumptions. Statistical Test: The cost estimation was conducted with a 20% lower and upper bound on the model assumptions to include the uncertainty of the assumptions. Results: 7.9% of the sequences had motion artifacts that decreased the interpretability, while 2.0% of the sequences had motion artifacts causing the images to be nondiagnostic. The estimated annual cost to the clinic/hospital due to patient head motion per scanner was $45,066 without pediatric examinations and $364,242 with pediatric examinations. Data Conclusion: The prevalence of a motion-corrupted image was found in 2.0% of the reviewed sequences. Based on the model, repayment periods are presented as a function of the price for applying motion correction and its performance. Evidence Level: 4. Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:731–738.

AB - Background: Patient head motion is a major concern in clinical brain MRI, as it reduces the diagnostic image quality and may increase examination time and cost. Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of MR images with significant motion artifacts on a given clinical scanner and to estimate the potential financial cost savings of applying motion correction to clinical brain MRI examinations. Study Type: Retrospective. Subjects: In all, 173 patients undergoing a PET/MRI dementia protocol and 55 pediatric patients undergoing a PET/MRI brain tumor protocol. The total scan time of the two protocols were 17 and 40 minutes, respectively. Field Strength/Sequences: 3 T, Siemens mMR Biograph, MPRAGE, DWI, T1 and T2-weighted FLAIR, T2-weighted 2D-FLASH, T2-weighted TSE. Assessment: A retrospective review of image sequences from a given clinical MRI scanner was conducted to investigate the prevalence of motion-corrupted images. The review was performed by three radiologists with different levels of experience using a three-step semiquantitative scale to classify the quality of the images. A total of 1013 sequences distributed on 228 MRI examinations were reviewed. The potential cost savings of motion correction were estimated by a cost estimation for our country with assumptions. Statistical Test: The cost estimation was conducted with a 20% lower and upper bound on the model assumptions to include the uncertainty of the assumptions. Results: 7.9% of the sequences had motion artifacts that decreased the interpretability, while 2.0% of the sequences had motion artifacts causing the images to be nondiagnostic. The estimated annual cost to the clinic/hospital due to patient head motion per scanner was $45,066 without pediatric examinations and $364,242 with pediatric examinations. Data Conclusion: The prevalence of a motion-corrupted image was found in 2.0% of the reviewed sequences. Based on the model, repayment periods are presented as a function of the price for applying motion correction and its performance. Evidence Level: 4. Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:731–738.

KW - cost saving

KW - motion artifacts

KW - motion correction

KW - MRI

KW - neuroimaging

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.27112

DO - 10.1002/jmri.27112

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32144848

AN - SCOPUS:85081385317

VL - 52

SP - 731

EP - 738

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 253403583