Prognostic value of combined CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging versus invasive coronary angiography and nuclear stress perfusion imaging in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: The CORE320 multicenter study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Marcus Y. Chen
  • Carlos E. Rochitte
  • Armin Arbab-Zadeh
  • Marc Dewey
  • Richard T. George
  • Julie M. Miller
  • Hiroyuki Niinuma
  • Kunihiro Yoshioka
  • Kakuya Kitagawa
  • Hajime Sakuma
  • Roger Laham
  • Andrea L. Vavere
  • Rodrigo J. Cerci
  • Vishal C. Mehra
  • Cesar Nomura
  • Masahiro Jinzaki
  • Sachio Kuribayashi
  • Arthur J. Scholte
  • Michael Laule
  • Swee Yaw Tan
  • John Hoe
  • Narinder Paul
  • Frank J. Rybicki
  • Jeffrey A. Brinker
  • Andrew E. Arai
  • Matthew B. Matheson
  • Christopher Cox
  • Melvin E. Clouse
  • Marcelo F. Di Carli
  • João A.C. Lima

Purpose: To compare the prognostic importance (time to major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]) of combined computed tomography (CT) angiography and CT myocardial stress perfusion imaging with that of combined invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and stress single photon emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by all institutional review boards, and written informed consent was obtained. Between November 2009 and July 2011, 381 participants clinically referred for ICA and aged 45-85 years were enrolled in the Combined Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320-Detector Row Computed Tomography (CORE320) prospective multicenter diagnostic study. All images were analyzed in blinded independent core laboratories, and a panel of physicians adjudicated all adverse events. MACE was defined as revascularization (>30 days after index ICA), myocardial infarction, or cardiac death; hospitalization for chest pain or congestive heart failure; or arrhythmia. Late MACE was defined similarly, except for patients who underwent revascularization within the first 182 days after ICA, who were excluded. Comparisons of 2-year survival (time to MACE) used standard Kaplan-Meier curves and restricted mean survival times bootstrapped with 2000 replicates. Results: An MACE (49 revascularizations, five myocardial infarctions, one cardiac death, nine hospitalizations for chest pain or congestive heart failure, and one arrhythmia) occurred in 51 of 379 patients (13.5%). The 2-year MACE-free rates for combined CT angiography and CT perfusion findings were 94% negative for coronary artery disease (CAD) versus 82% positive for CAD and were similar to combined ICA and single photon emission CT findings (93% negative for CAD vs 77% positive for CAD, P < .001 for both). Event-free rates for CT angiography and CT perfusion versus ICA and single photon emission CT for either positive or negative results were not significantly different for MACE or late MACE (P > .05 for all). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for combined CT angiography and CT perfusion (AUC = 68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 62, 75) was similar (P = .36) to that for combined ICA and single photon emission CT (AUC = 71; 95% CI: 65, 79) in the identification of MACE at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Combined CT angiography and CT perfusion enables similar prediction of 2-year MACE, late MACE, and event-free survival similar to that enabled by ICA and single photon emission CT.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRadiology
Vol/bind284
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)55-65
Antal sider11
ISSN0033-8419
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

ID: 197849473