Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status : a multicenter retrospective study. / Azim, Hatem A; Kroman, Niels; Paesmans, Marianne; Gelber, Shari; Rotmensz, Nicole; Ameye, Lieveke; De Mattos-Arruda, Leticia; Pistilli, Barbara; Pinto, Alvaro; Jensen, Maj-Britt; Cordoba, Octavi; de Azambuja, Evandro; Goldhirsch, Aron; Piccart, Martine J; Peccatori, Fedro A.

I: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Bind 31, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 73-9.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Azim, HA, Kroman, N, Paesmans, M, Gelber, S, Rotmensz, N, Ameye, L, De Mattos-Arruda, L, Pistilli, B, Pinto, A, Jensen, M-B, Cordoba, O, de Azambuja, E, Goldhirsch, A, Piccart, MJ & Peccatori, FA 2013, 'Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study', Journal of Clinical Oncology, bind 31, nr. 1, s. 73-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2285

APA

Azim, H. A., Kroman, N., Paesmans, M., Gelber, S., Rotmensz, N., Ameye, L., De Mattos-Arruda, L., Pistilli, B., Pinto, A., Jensen, M-B., Cordoba, O., de Azambuja, E., Goldhirsch, A., Piccart, M. J., & Peccatori, F. A. (2013). Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(1), 73-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2285

Vancouver

Azim HA, Kroman N, Paesmans M, Gelber S, Rotmensz N, Ameye L o.a. Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31(1):73-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2285

Author

Azim, Hatem A ; Kroman, Niels ; Paesmans, Marianne ; Gelber, Shari ; Rotmensz, Nicole ; Ameye, Lieveke ; De Mattos-Arruda, Leticia ; Pistilli, Barbara ; Pinto, Alvaro ; Jensen, Maj-Britt ; Cordoba, Octavi ; de Azambuja, Evandro ; Goldhirsch, Aron ; Piccart, Martine J ; Peccatori, Fedro A. / Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status : a multicenter retrospective study. I: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013 ; Bind 31, Nr. 1. s. 73-9.

Bibtex

@article{6d37a45beeae4790a358a17221602944,
title = "Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study",
abstract = "PURPOSE We questioned the impact of pregnancy on disease-free survival (DFS) in women with history of breast cancer (BC) according to estrogen receptor (ER) status. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, retrospective cohort study in which patients who became pregnant any time after BC were matched (1:3) to patients with BC with similar ER, nodal status, adjuvant therapy, age, and year of diagnosis. To adjust for guaranteed time bias, each nonpregnant patient had to have a disease-free interval at least equal to the time elapsing between BC diagnosis and date of conception of the matched pregnant one. The primary objective was DFS in patients with ER-positive BC. DFS in the ER-negative cohort, whole population, and overall survival (OS) were secondary objectives. Subgroup analyses included DFS according to pregnancy outcome and BC-pregnancy interval. With a two-sided α = 5% and β = 20%, 645 ER-positive patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65. Results A total of 333 pregnant patients and 874 matched nonpregnant patients were analyzed, of whom 686 patients had an ER-positive disease. No difference in DFS was observed between pregnant and nonpregnant patients in the ER-positive (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.24, P = .55) or the ER-negative (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08, P = .12) cohorts. However, the pregnant group had better OS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97, P = .03), with no interaction according to ER status (P = .11). Pregnancy outcome and BC-pregnancy interval did not seem to impact the risk of relapse. CONCLUSION Pregnancy after ER-positive BC does not seem to reduce the risk of BC recurrence.",
author = "Azim, {Hatem A} and Niels Kroman and Marianne Paesmans and Shari Gelber and Nicole Rotmensz and Lieveke Ameye and {De Mattos-Arruda}, Leticia and Barbara Pistilli and Alvaro Pinto and Maj-Britt Jensen and Octavi Cordoba and {de Azambuja}, Evandro and Aron Goldhirsch and Piccart, {Martine J} and Peccatori, {Fedro A}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2285",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "73--9",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status

T2 - a multicenter retrospective study

AU - Azim, Hatem A

AU - Kroman, Niels

AU - Paesmans, Marianne

AU - Gelber, Shari

AU - Rotmensz, Nicole

AU - Ameye, Lieveke

AU - De Mattos-Arruda, Leticia

AU - Pistilli, Barbara

AU - Pinto, Alvaro

AU - Jensen, Maj-Britt

AU - Cordoba, Octavi

AU - de Azambuja, Evandro

AU - Goldhirsch, Aron

AU - Piccart, Martine J

AU - Peccatori, Fedro A

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - PURPOSE We questioned the impact of pregnancy on disease-free survival (DFS) in women with history of breast cancer (BC) according to estrogen receptor (ER) status. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, retrospective cohort study in which patients who became pregnant any time after BC were matched (1:3) to patients with BC with similar ER, nodal status, adjuvant therapy, age, and year of diagnosis. To adjust for guaranteed time bias, each nonpregnant patient had to have a disease-free interval at least equal to the time elapsing between BC diagnosis and date of conception of the matched pregnant one. The primary objective was DFS in patients with ER-positive BC. DFS in the ER-negative cohort, whole population, and overall survival (OS) were secondary objectives. Subgroup analyses included DFS according to pregnancy outcome and BC-pregnancy interval. With a two-sided α = 5% and β = 20%, 645 ER-positive patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65. Results A total of 333 pregnant patients and 874 matched nonpregnant patients were analyzed, of whom 686 patients had an ER-positive disease. No difference in DFS was observed between pregnant and nonpregnant patients in the ER-positive (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.24, P = .55) or the ER-negative (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08, P = .12) cohorts. However, the pregnant group had better OS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97, P = .03), with no interaction according to ER status (P = .11). Pregnancy outcome and BC-pregnancy interval did not seem to impact the risk of relapse. CONCLUSION Pregnancy after ER-positive BC does not seem to reduce the risk of BC recurrence.

AB - PURPOSE We questioned the impact of pregnancy on disease-free survival (DFS) in women with history of breast cancer (BC) according to estrogen receptor (ER) status. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, retrospective cohort study in which patients who became pregnant any time after BC were matched (1:3) to patients with BC with similar ER, nodal status, adjuvant therapy, age, and year of diagnosis. To adjust for guaranteed time bias, each nonpregnant patient had to have a disease-free interval at least equal to the time elapsing between BC diagnosis and date of conception of the matched pregnant one. The primary objective was DFS in patients with ER-positive BC. DFS in the ER-negative cohort, whole population, and overall survival (OS) were secondary objectives. Subgroup analyses included DFS according to pregnancy outcome and BC-pregnancy interval. With a two-sided α = 5% and β = 20%, 645 ER-positive patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65. Results A total of 333 pregnant patients and 874 matched nonpregnant patients were analyzed, of whom 686 patients had an ER-positive disease. No difference in DFS was observed between pregnant and nonpregnant patients in the ER-positive (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.24, P = .55) or the ER-negative (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08, P = .12) cohorts. However, the pregnant group had better OS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97, P = .03), with no interaction according to ER status (P = .11). Pregnancy outcome and BC-pregnancy interval did not seem to impact the risk of relapse. CONCLUSION Pregnancy after ER-positive BC does not seem to reduce the risk of BC recurrence.

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2285

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2285

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23169515

VL - 31

SP - 73

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 48504601