TY - JOUR

T1 - Political trust in the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic

T2 - a survey in Denmark and Sweden

AU - Kallemose, Thomas

AU - Kirk, Jeanette Wassar

AU - Karlsen, elin

AU - Seing, Ida

AU - Stefánsdóttir, Nina Þórný

AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten

AU - Andersen, Ove

AU - Nilsen, Per

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: The initial responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark and Sweden differed markedly. Balancing disparate concerns was crucial to generate trust in the COVID-19 restrictions. The aim was to investigate the extent to which there was trust in the handling of the pandemic by the Danish and Swedish governments and public health authorities in each country. A further aim was also to investigate the characteristics of those in Denmark and Sweden who expressed the lowest degree of trust.Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 2021, using web panels that are nationally representative of the socio-demographic characteristics. The population consisted of 2619 individuals from Denmark and 2633 from Sweden, representative of the age, sex and region of residence of the populations aged ≥18 years. Trust in government and health authorities was captured in two separate trust questions on a five-point Likert scale and dichotomized into low trusters and non-low trusters for analysis.Results: Approximately 61% of the Danish respondents expressed moderately large or very large trust in the government’s handling of the pandemic. The corresponding proportion for Sweden was 42%. The proportion of low trusters was 11% in Denmark and 34% in Sweden (p < 0.001). Moderately large or very large trust in the public health authority’s handling was expressed by 83% of the Danish respondents and 74% of the Swedish respondents. The proportion of low trusters was 5% in Denmark and 17% in Sweden (p < 0.001). In both countries, trust was lower among men than among women. Age and education were associated with trust but differed between countries (p <= 0.011).Conclusions: In this study differences in trust between Denmark and Sweden and both overall and within socio-demographic factors were observed. However, given the limitations and bias in the study it is difficult to determine the cause and true size of these differences. With that in mind we still believe specific populations and sub groups within those populations have the potential to affect trust in handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that these should be kept in mind when developing and communicating responses to pandemics. Keywords: Political trust, Pandemic restrictions, COVID-19, Restrictions

AB - Background: The initial responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark and Sweden differed markedly. Balancing disparate concerns was crucial to generate trust in the COVID-19 restrictions. The aim was to investigate the extent to which there was trust in the handling of the pandemic by the Danish and Swedish governments and public health authorities in each country. A further aim was also to investigate the characteristics of those in Denmark and Sweden who expressed the lowest degree of trust.Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 2021, using web panels that are nationally representative of the socio-demographic characteristics. The population consisted of 2619 individuals from Denmark and 2633 from Sweden, representative of the age, sex and region of residence of the populations aged ≥18 years. Trust in government and health authorities was captured in two separate trust questions on a five-point Likert scale and dichotomized into low trusters and non-low trusters for analysis.Results: Approximately 61% of the Danish respondents expressed moderately large or very large trust in the government’s handling of the pandemic. The corresponding proportion for Sweden was 42%. The proportion of low trusters was 11% in Denmark and 34% in Sweden (p < 0.001). Moderately large or very large trust in the public health authority’s handling was expressed by 83% of the Danish respondents and 74% of the Swedish respondents. The proportion of low trusters was 5% in Denmark and 17% in Sweden (p < 0.001). In both countries, trust was lower among men than among women. Age and education were associated with trust but differed between countries (p <= 0.011).Conclusions: In this study differences in trust between Denmark and Sweden and both overall and within socio-demographic factors were observed. However, given the limitations and bias in the study it is difficult to determine the cause and true size of these differences. With that in mind we still believe specific populations and sub groups within those populations have the potential to affect trust in handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that these should be kept in mind when developing and communicating responses to pandemics. Keywords: Political trust, Pandemic restrictions, COVID-19, Restrictions

M3 - Journal article

JO - Publishers Weekly

JF - Publishers Weekly

SN - 0000-0019

ER -