Place of next generation acute migraine specific treatments among triptans, non-responders and contraindications to triptans and possible combination therapies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 947 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Irene de Boer
  • Iris Elsa Verhagen
  • Marcio Nattan Portes Souza
  • dlt446, dlt446

Background: For many years triptans have been the cornerstone of acute migraine treatment. Nevertheless, treatment with triptans may not always be initiated due to contraindications (seen in approximately one fifth of patients) or inadequate response (seen in approximately one third of patients). New acute therapies, including 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1F receptor agonists, also known as ditans (lasmiditan) and small molecule antagonists of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, also known as gepants (rimegepant and ubrogepant), may be an effective alternative. Methods: We searched Pubmed for keywords, summarized the literature and provided a comprehensive review on the place of next generation acute migraine specific treatments among triptans. Results and conclusion: Post-hoc analyses reported no differences in efficacy of gepants/ditans between responders and non-responders to triptans, but research is hampered by lack of consensus on the definition of non-responder. Due to (partially) overlapping mechanisms of action, it remains unknown whether combination therapy with lasmiditan, gepants and triptans will have added value over monotherapy. Preclinical studies and post-hoc analyses cautiously indicate that these new drugs are safe for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. However, long-term studies are needed to prove cardiovascular safety. The risk of developing medication overuse headache may differ between triptans, ditans and gepants, but further studies are needed to confirm this difference. Head-to-head randomized controlled trials of acute therapies and combinations of therapies are needed to determine their place in migraine treatment among established therapies.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCephalalgia
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)1-13
ISSN0333-1024
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: IdB reports research support by the Dutch Heart Foundation, Stichting Dioraphte and the International Retinal Research Foundation. IEV reports research support by the Dutch Brain Foundation and Dutch Research Council. MNPS reports personal fees by Abbvie/Allergan, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva, Libbs, Sandoz, Sanofi. MA reports personal fees by AbbVie/Allergan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Percept Corporation and Teva, research support (institutional payment) by the Lundbeck Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Novartis, clinical trials involvement: PI for AbbVie/Allergan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Teva. All authors have no ownership interest and do not own stocks of any pharmaceutical company.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.

ID: 371016778