Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. / Wilson, Ian; Bohm, Eric; Lübbeke, Anne; Lyman, Stephen; Overgaard, Søren; Rolfson, Ola; W-Dahl, Annette; Wilkinson, Mark; Dunbar, Michael.
I: EFORT Open Reviews, Bind 4, Nr. 6, 01.06.2019, s. 357-367.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures
AU - Wilson, Ian
AU - Bohm, Eric
AU - Lübbeke, Anne
AU - Lyman, Stephen
AU - Overgaard, Søren
AU - Rolfson, Ola
AU - W-Dahl, Annette
AU - Wilkinson, Mark
AU - Dunbar, Michael
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - □Total joint arthroplasty is performed to decreased pain, restore function and productivity and improve quality of life. □One-year implant survivorship following surgery is nearly 100%; however, self-reported satisfaction is 80% after total knee arthroplasty and 90% after total hip arthroplasty. □ Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are produced by patients reporting on their own health status directly without interpretation from a surgeon or other medical professional; a PRO measure (PROM) is a tool, often a questionnaire, that measures different aspects of patientrelated outcomes. □ Generic PROs are related to a patient's general health and quality of life, whereas a specific PRO is focused on a particular disease, symptom or anatomical region. □ While revision surgery is the traditional endpoint of registries, it is blunt and likely insufficient as a measure of success; PROMs address this shortcoming by expanding beyond survival and measuring outcomes that are relevant to patients - relief of pain, restoration of function and improvement in quality of life. □ PROMs are increasing in use in many national and regional orthopaedic arthroplasty registries. □PROMs data can provide important information on valuebased care, support quality assurance and improvement initiatives, help refine surgical indications and may improve shared decision-making and surgical timing. □There are several practical considerations that need to be considered when implementing PROMs collection, as the undertaking itself may be expensive, a burden to the patient, as well as being time and labour intensive.
AB - □Total joint arthroplasty is performed to decreased pain, restore function and productivity and improve quality of life. □One-year implant survivorship following surgery is nearly 100%; however, self-reported satisfaction is 80% after total knee arthroplasty and 90% after total hip arthroplasty. □ Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are produced by patients reporting on their own health status directly without interpretation from a surgeon or other medical professional; a PRO measure (PROM) is a tool, often a questionnaire, that measures different aspects of patientrelated outcomes. □ Generic PROs are related to a patient's general health and quality of life, whereas a specific PRO is focused on a particular disease, symptom or anatomical region. □ While revision surgery is the traditional endpoint of registries, it is blunt and likely insufficient as a measure of success; PROMs address this shortcoming by expanding beyond survival and measuring outcomes that are relevant to patients - relief of pain, restoration of function and improvement in quality of life. □ PROMs are increasing in use in many national and regional orthopaedic arthroplasty registries. □PROMs data can provide important information on valuebased care, support quality assurance and improvement initiatives, help refine surgical indications and may improve shared decision-making and surgical timing. □There are several practical considerations that need to be considered when implementing PROMs collection, as the undertaking itself may be expensive, a burden to the patient, as well as being time and labour intensive.
U2 - 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080
DO - 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31210973
AN - SCOPUS:85066934172
VL - 4
SP - 357
EP - 367
JO - EFORT Open Reviews
JF - EFORT Open Reviews
SN - 2396-7544
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 252053004