No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories? / Halvorson, Hans; Clifton, Rob.

I: Philosophy of Science, Bind 69, Nr. 1, 2002, s. 1-28.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Halvorson, H & Clifton, R 2002, 'No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?', Philosophy of Science, bind 69, nr. 1, s. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/338939

APA

Halvorson, H., & Clifton, R. (2002). No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories? Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/338939

Vancouver

Halvorson H, Clifton R. No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories? Philosophy of Science. 2002;69(1):1-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/338939

Author

Halvorson, Hans ; Clifton, Rob. / No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?. I: Philosophy of Science. 2002 ; Bind 69, Nr. 1. s. 1-28.

Bibtex

@article{a12a45bf808a4e8791cb828be5764bd4,
title = "No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?",
abstract = "David Malament (1996) has recently argued that there can be no relativistic quantum theory of (localizable) particles. We consider and rebut several objections that have been made against the soundness of Malament's argument. We then consider some further objections that might be made against the generality of Malament's conclusion, and we supply three no-go theorems to counter these objections. Finally, we dispel potential worries about the counterintuitive nature of these results by showing that relativistic quantum field theory itself explains the appearance of {"}particle detections.{"}.",
author = "Hans Halvorson and Rob Clifton",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1086/338939",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0031-8248",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories?

AU - Halvorson, Hans

AU - Clifton, Rob

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - David Malament (1996) has recently argued that there can be no relativistic quantum theory of (localizable) particles. We consider and rebut several objections that have been made against the soundness of Malament's argument. We then consider some further objections that might be made against the generality of Malament's conclusion, and we supply three no-go theorems to counter these objections. Finally, we dispel potential worries about the counterintuitive nature of these results by showing that relativistic quantum field theory itself explains the appearance of "particle detections.".

AB - David Malament (1996) has recently argued that there can be no relativistic quantum theory of (localizable) particles. We consider and rebut several objections that have been made against the soundness of Malament's argument. We then consider some further objections that might be made against the generality of Malament's conclusion, and we supply three no-go theorems to counter these objections. Finally, we dispel potential worries about the counterintuitive nature of these results by showing that relativistic quantum field theory itself explains the appearance of "particle detections.".

U2 - 10.1086/338939

DO - 10.1086/338939

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0042307512

VL - 69

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Philosophy of Science

JF - Philosophy of Science

SN - 0031-8248

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 289119119