TY - JOUR

T1 - Need for lateral bone augmentation at two narrow-diameter implants

T2 - A prospective, controlled, clinical study

AU - Roccuzzo, Andrea

AU - Imber, Jean-Claude

AU - Jensen, Simon Storgård

N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To detect the potential influence of implant diameter and anatomic factors on the need for bone augmentation procedures (BAPs) when replacing congenitally missing lateral incisors (MLIs).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with congenitally missing MLIs with a mesio-distal distance between the canine and the central incisor of 5.9-6.3mm received a Ø2.9mm implant while Ø3.3mm implants were placed when the distance was 6.4-7.1mm. The following linear measurements were recorded using a caliper: width of the alveolar process (WAP), width of the bony alveolar ridge (WAR), thickness of the facial bone after implant osteotomy (TFB). Guided bone regeneration was performed in case of fenestration- or dehiscence-type defects or a thin TFB (<1.7mm).RESULTS: Fifty Ø2.9mm and 50 Ø3.3mm were included in 100 patients. WAP and WAR did not differ between the groups (p>0.05). TFB was statistically significant larger in the Ø2.9 group (1.75±0.59mm) compared to the Ø3.3 group (1.5±0.63mm) (p= 0.041). Fenestration-type defects (p=0.005) and a thin facial bone wall (p=0.045) was observed more frequently in the Ø3.3 compared to the Ø2.9 group. Correspondingly, BAP was indicated more frequently in the Ø3.3 compared to the Ø2.9 group (p=0.017). WAP, MD, and WAR were statistically significant correlated to the need for BAP (p< 0.001). As independent variable, only WAR influenced the probability of BAP (p< 0.001).CONCLUSION: The use of 2.9 diameter implants was correlated to a reduced frequency of BAP compared to 3.3.mm implants, without reaching a statistically significant difference. Measurement of the WAP provides the clinician useful information to predict BAP.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To detect the potential influence of implant diameter and anatomic factors on the need for bone augmentation procedures (BAPs) when replacing congenitally missing lateral incisors (MLIs).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with congenitally missing MLIs with a mesio-distal distance between the canine and the central incisor of 5.9-6.3mm received a Ø2.9mm implant while Ø3.3mm implants were placed when the distance was 6.4-7.1mm. The following linear measurements were recorded using a caliper: width of the alveolar process (WAP), width of the bony alveolar ridge (WAR), thickness of the facial bone after implant osteotomy (TFB). Guided bone regeneration was performed in case of fenestration- or dehiscence-type defects or a thin TFB (<1.7mm).RESULTS: Fifty Ø2.9mm and 50 Ø3.3mm were included in 100 patients. WAP and WAR did not differ between the groups (p>0.05). TFB was statistically significant larger in the Ø2.9 group (1.75±0.59mm) compared to the Ø3.3 group (1.5±0.63mm) (p= 0.041). Fenestration-type defects (p=0.005) and a thin facial bone wall (p=0.045) was observed more frequently in the Ø3.3 compared to the Ø2.9 group. Correspondingly, BAP was indicated more frequently in the Ø3.3 compared to the Ø2.9 group (p=0.017). WAP, MD, and WAR were statistically significant correlated to the need for BAP (p< 0.001). As independent variable, only WAR influenced the probability of BAP (p< 0.001).CONCLUSION: The use of 2.9 diameter implants was correlated to a reduced frequency of BAP compared to 3.3.mm implants, without reaching a statistically significant difference. Measurement of the WAP provides the clinician useful information to predict BAP.

U2 - 10.1111/clr.13721

DO - 10.1111/clr.13721

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33548077

VL - 32

SP - 511

EP - 520

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 4

ER -