National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg. / Broberg, Morten.

I: European Human Rights Law Review, Nr. 2, 19.04.2021, s. 162-171.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Broberg, M 2021, 'National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg', European Human Rights Law Review, nr. 2, s. 162-171.

APA

Broberg, M. (2021). National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg. European Human Rights Law Review, (2), 162-171.

Vancouver

Broberg M. National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg. European Human Rights Law Review. 2021 apr. 19;(2):162-171.

Author

Broberg, Morten. / National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg. I: European Human Rights Law Review. 2021 ; Nr. 2. s. 162-171.

Bibtex

@article{75e4873cfb9c482c9b8943cb5b8d326f,
title = "National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg",
abstract = "When deciding a dispute, a national court in the EU can ask the CJEU to make a preliminary ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act. According to the ECtHR, if a national court of last instance has rejected a request by parties in the proceedings for a preliminary ruling to be made, this may infringe the ECHR. Firstly, where EU Member States (who are all ECHR Contracting Parties) have transferred competence to the EU (not an ECHR Contracting Party), the ECtHR applies a presumption that the EU provides human rights protection equivalent to the ECHR so that the transfer is ECHR compatible. In this regard, the preliminary ruling is an important controlling mechanism, so that failing to refer may rebut this presumption. Secondly, where a national court refuses to make a preliminary reference requested by a party without providing reasons, this may infringe Article 6(1) ECHR.",
author = "Morten Broberg",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "19",
language = "English",
pages = "162--171",
journal = "European human rights law review",
issn = "1361-1526",
publisher = "Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - National EU Courts Must Seek Advice in Luxembourg or Face Reproach in Strasbourg

AU - Broberg, Morten

PY - 2021/4/19

Y1 - 2021/4/19

N2 - When deciding a dispute, a national court in the EU can ask the CJEU to make a preliminary ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act. According to the ECtHR, if a national court of last instance has rejected a request by parties in the proceedings for a preliminary ruling to be made, this may infringe the ECHR. Firstly, where EU Member States (who are all ECHR Contracting Parties) have transferred competence to the EU (not an ECHR Contracting Party), the ECtHR applies a presumption that the EU provides human rights protection equivalent to the ECHR so that the transfer is ECHR compatible. In this regard, the preliminary ruling is an important controlling mechanism, so that failing to refer may rebut this presumption. Secondly, where a national court refuses to make a preliminary reference requested by a party without providing reasons, this may infringe Article 6(1) ECHR.

AB - When deciding a dispute, a national court in the EU can ask the CJEU to make a preliminary ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act. According to the ECtHR, if a national court of last instance has rejected a request by parties in the proceedings for a preliminary ruling to be made, this may infringe the ECHR. Firstly, where EU Member States (who are all ECHR Contracting Parties) have transferred competence to the EU (not an ECHR Contracting Party), the ECtHR applies a presumption that the EU provides human rights protection equivalent to the ECHR so that the transfer is ECHR compatible. In this regard, the preliminary ruling is an important controlling mechanism, so that failing to refer may rebut this presumption. Secondly, where a national court refuses to make a preliminary reference requested by a party without providing reasons, this may infringe Article 6(1) ECHR.

M3 - Journal article

SP - 162

EP - 171

JO - European human rights law review

JF - European human rights law review

SN - 1361-1526

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 256735243