Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Cohort Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques : A Prospective Cohort Study. / Jørgensen, Line Bisgaard; Halekoh, Ulrich; Jemec, Gregor B.E.; Sørensen, Jens Ahm; Yderstræde, Knud Bonnet.

I: Advances in Wound Care, Bind 9, Nr. 10, 2020, s. 553-563.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jørgensen, LB, Halekoh, U, Jemec, GBE, Sørensen, JA & Yderstræde, KB 2020, 'Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Cohort Study', Advances in Wound Care, bind 9, nr. 10, s. 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2019.1000

APA

Jørgensen, L. B., Halekoh, U., Jemec, G. B. E., Sørensen, J. A., & Yderstræde, K. B. (2020). Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Cohort Study. Advances in Wound Care, 9(10), 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2019.1000

Vancouver

Jørgensen LB, Halekoh U, Jemec GBE, Sørensen JA, Yderstræde KB. Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Cohort Study. Advances in Wound Care. 2020;9(10):553-563. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2019.1000

Author

Jørgensen, Line Bisgaard ; Halekoh, Ulrich ; Jemec, Gregor B.E. ; Sørensen, Jens Ahm ; Yderstræde, Knud Bonnet. / Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques : A Prospective Cohort Study. I: Advances in Wound Care. 2020 ; Bind 9, Nr. 10. s. 553-563.

Bibtex

@article{46d736b00c524d3abeb815f7c24480f0,
title = "Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Cohort Study",
abstract = "Three-dimensional (3D) wound measurements enable the evaluation of wound healing from the wound bed, which may be a more sensitive measure than traditional two-dimensional (2D) area measurements at the level of the skin surface. Few studies have investigated 3D measurements for monitoring wound healing over time. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in 3D area measurements with traditional (2D) area measurements of diabetic foot ulcers during 8 weeks. Approach: In a prospective cohort study, we monitored the wound healing of 150 diabetic foot ulcers using the 3D-wound assessment monitor camera (3D area) and the digital imaging method (2D area) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8. The following statistical approaches were used to compare the changes in 2D area and 3D area measurements: linear regression analysis, paired Wilcoxon rank test, Bonett-Price 95% confidence interval, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: The overall changes in 3D area were significantly larger compared with 2D area as assessed by Wilcoxon test (p < 0.0001) and Bonett-Price 95% confidence interval of 0.009-0.163. In addition, comparison of 2D area and 3D area measurements showed that the majority of the wounds had larger decrease in 3D area compared with 2D area over time. Innovation: 3D area appears to provide a more sensitive method to monitor wound healing. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential benefit of a novel 3D camera for monitoring wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers, which was found particularly useful in monitoring wound healing in large wounds. However, in small wounds (<5 cm2), the 2D area and 3D area measurements perform equally well in monitoring the wound healing. ",
keywords = "diabetic foot ulcers, imaging, lower extremity ulcers, monitoring, three-dimensional wound measurements, wound healing",
author = "J{\o}rgensen, {Line Bisgaard} and Ulrich Halekoh and Jemec, {Gregor B.E.} and S{\o}rensen, {Jens Ahm} and Yderstr{\ae}de, {Knud Bonnet}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1089/wound.2019.1000",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "553--563",
journal = "Advances in Wound Care",
issn = "2162-1918",
publisher = "Mary AnnLiebert, Inc. Publishers",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Techniques

T2 - A Prospective Cohort Study

AU - Jørgensen, Line Bisgaard

AU - Halekoh, Ulrich

AU - Jemec, Gregor B.E.

AU - Sørensen, Jens Ahm

AU - Yderstræde, Knud Bonnet

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Three-dimensional (3D) wound measurements enable the evaluation of wound healing from the wound bed, which may be a more sensitive measure than traditional two-dimensional (2D) area measurements at the level of the skin surface. Few studies have investigated 3D measurements for monitoring wound healing over time. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in 3D area measurements with traditional (2D) area measurements of diabetic foot ulcers during 8 weeks. Approach: In a prospective cohort study, we monitored the wound healing of 150 diabetic foot ulcers using the 3D-wound assessment monitor camera (3D area) and the digital imaging method (2D area) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8. The following statistical approaches were used to compare the changes in 2D area and 3D area measurements: linear regression analysis, paired Wilcoxon rank test, Bonett-Price 95% confidence interval, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: The overall changes in 3D area were significantly larger compared with 2D area as assessed by Wilcoxon test (p < 0.0001) and Bonett-Price 95% confidence interval of 0.009-0.163. In addition, comparison of 2D area and 3D area measurements showed that the majority of the wounds had larger decrease in 3D area compared with 2D area over time. Innovation: 3D area appears to provide a more sensitive method to monitor wound healing. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential benefit of a novel 3D camera for monitoring wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers, which was found particularly useful in monitoring wound healing in large wounds. However, in small wounds (<5 cm2), the 2D area and 3D area measurements perform equally well in monitoring the wound healing.

AB - Three-dimensional (3D) wound measurements enable the evaluation of wound healing from the wound bed, which may be a more sensitive measure than traditional two-dimensional (2D) area measurements at the level of the skin surface. Few studies have investigated 3D measurements for monitoring wound healing over time. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in 3D area measurements with traditional (2D) area measurements of diabetic foot ulcers during 8 weeks. Approach: In a prospective cohort study, we monitored the wound healing of 150 diabetic foot ulcers using the 3D-wound assessment monitor camera (3D area) and the digital imaging method (2D area) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8. The following statistical approaches were used to compare the changes in 2D area and 3D area measurements: linear regression analysis, paired Wilcoxon rank test, Bonett-Price 95% confidence interval, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: The overall changes in 3D area were significantly larger compared with 2D area as assessed by Wilcoxon test (p < 0.0001) and Bonett-Price 95% confidence interval of 0.009-0.163. In addition, comparison of 2D area and 3D area measurements showed that the majority of the wounds had larger decrease in 3D area compared with 2D area over time. Innovation: 3D area appears to provide a more sensitive method to monitor wound healing. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential benefit of a novel 3D camera for monitoring wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers, which was found particularly useful in monitoring wound healing in large wounds. However, in small wounds (<5 cm2), the 2D area and 3D area measurements perform equally well in monitoring the wound healing.

KW - diabetic foot ulcers

KW - imaging

KW - lower extremity ulcers

KW - monitoring

KW - three-dimensional wound measurements

KW - wound healing

U2 - 10.1089/wound.2019.1000

DO - 10.1089/wound.2019.1000

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85093861983

VL - 9

SP - 553

EP - 563

JO - Advances in Wound Care

JF - Advances in Wound Care

SN - 2162-1918

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 270424943