Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark. / Leni, Riccardo; Vickers, Andrew Julian; Brasso, Klaus; Montorsi, Francesco; Briganti, Alberto; Nielsen, Torben Kjær; Røder, Andreas; Stroomberg, Hein Vincent.

I: Journal of Urology, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Leni, R, Vickers, AJ, Brasso, K, Montorsi, F, Briganti, A, Nielsen, TK, Røder, A & Stroomberg, HV 2024, 'Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark', Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004159

APA

Leni, R., Vickers, A. J., Brasso, K., Montorsi, F., Briganti, A., Nielsen, T. K., Røder, A., & Stroomberg, H. V. (Accepteret/In press). Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark. Journal of Urology, [10.1097/JU.0000000000004159]. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004159

Vancouver

Leni R, Vickers AJ, Brasso K, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Nielsen TK o.a. Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark. Journal of Urology. 2024. 10.1097/JU.0000000000004159. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004159

Author

Leni, Riccardo ; Vickers, Andrew Julian ; Brasso, Klaus ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Briganti, Alberto ; Nielsen, Torben Kjær ; Røder, Andreas ; Stroomberg, Hein Vincent. / Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark. I: Journal of Urology. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{4f55ea04b98545f08855fed7466e5182,
title = "Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark",
abstract = "Purpose: Approximately one in ten patients without prior prostate biopsy undergoing surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms harbor incidental prostate cancer, however, practice guidelines do not provide recommendations for its management. We aimed at describing the oncologic outcomes of patients with grade group (GG) 1 and 2 prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Materials and methods: This was a nationwide population-based observational study of patients undergoing TURP in Denmark from 2006 to 2022 using the Danish Prostate Registry. We estimated the cumulative incidence of further biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), curative treatment, endocrine treatment, and cause-specific mortality with competing risk analyses. Results: Among 24,494 patients who underwent TURP, there were 1016 men with GG 1 and 381 with GG 2. The five-year cumulative incidence of further MRIs or biopsies was 36% (95% CI 33-39%) for GG 1, and 30% (95% CI 25-34%) for GG 2. Fifteen-year prostate cancer mortality was 8.4% (95% CI 5.3-11%) for GG 1, and 14% (7.5-21%) for GG 2. A total of 270 men with GG 1 underwent a biopsy after the TURP, and 162 (60%) had no cancer, in this group, prostate cancer mortality after 15 years was 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.8%). Men with post-TURP biopsy of GG ≥2 had a prostate cancer mortality of 30% (95% CI 9-50%) 15 years post-TURP. The major limitation was the heterogeneous follow-up, which could lead to an overestimation of prostate cancer mortality compared to a more standardized follow-up. Conclusions: We observed high prostate cancer mortality after TURP with GG 1 or 2, likely due to unsampled high-grade cancer in the peripheral zone. Patients with incidental prostate cancer should be further investigated to rule out high-grade cancer. For patients with GG 1 on TURP, once a subsequent biopsy does not show cancer, follow-up should be lessened similar to that of patients with an initial non-malignant biopsy.",
keywords = "Incidental prostate cancer, Prostate-cancer specific mortality, Transurethral resection of the prostate",
author = "Riccardo Leni and Vickers, {Andrew Julian} and Klaus Brasso and Francesco Montorsi and Alberto Briganti and Nielsen, {Torben Kj{\ae}r} and Andreas R{\o}der and Stroomberg, {Hein Vincent}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1097/JU.0000000000004159",
language = "English",
journal = "The Journal of Urology (Italian Edition)",
issn = "1828-6593",
publisher = "EdizioniEdra",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management and oncologic outcomes of incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate in Denmark

AU - Leni, Riccardo

AU - Vickers, Andrew Julian

AU - Brasso, Klaus

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Briganti, Alberto

AU - Nielsen, Torben Kjær

AU - Røder, Andreas

AU - Stroomberg, Hein Vincent

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Purpose: Approximately one in ten patients without prior prostate biopsy undergoing surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms harbor incidental prostate cancer, however, practice guidelines do not provide recommendations for its management. We aimed at describing the oncologic outcomes of patients with grade group (GG) 1 and 2 prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Materials and methods: This was a nationwide population-based observational study of patients undergoing TURP in Denmark from 2006 to 2022 using the Danish Prostate Registry. We estimated the cumulative incidence of further biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), curative treatment, endocrine treatment, and cause-specific mortality with competing risk analyses. Results: Among 24,494 patients who underwent TURP, there were 1016 men with GG 1 and 381 with GG 2. The five-year cumulative incidence of further MRIs or biopsies was 36% (95% CI 33-39%) for GG 1, and 30% (95% CI 25-34%) for GG 2. Fifteen-year prostate cancer mortality was 8.4% (95% CI 5.3-11%) for GG 1, and 14% (7.5-21%) for GG 2. A total of 270 men with GG 1 underwent a biopsy after the TURP, and 162 (60%) had no cancer, in this group, prostate cancer mortality after 15 years was 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.8%). Men with post-TURP biopsy of GG ≥2 had a prostate cancer mortality of 30% (95% CI 9-50%) 15 years post-TURP. The major limitation was the heterogeneous follow-up, which could lead to an overestimation of prostate cancer mortality compared to a more standardized follow-up. Conclusions: We observed high prostate cancer mortality after TURP with GG 1 or 2, likely due to unsampled high-grade cancer in the peripheral zone. Patients with incidental prostate cancer should be further investigated to rule out high-grade cancer. For patients with GG 1 on TURP, once a subsequent biopsy does not show cancer, follow-up should be lessened similar to that of patients with an initial non-malignant biopsy.

AB - Purpose: Approximately one in ten patients without prior prostate biopsy undergoing surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms harbor incidental prostate cancer, however, practice guidelines do not provide recommendations for its management. We aimed at describing the oncologic outcomes of patients with grade group (GG) 1 and 2 prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Materials and methods: This was a nationwide population-based observational study of patients undergoing TURP in Denmark from 2006 to 2022 using the Danish Prostate Registry. We estimated the cumulative incidence of further biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), curative treatment, endocrine treatment, and cause-specific mortality with competing risk analyses. Results: Among 24,494 patients who underwent TURP, there were 1016 men with GG 1 and 381 with GG 2. The five-year cumulative incidence of further MRIs or biopsies was 36% (95% CI 33-39%) for GG 1, and 30% (95% CI 25-34%) for GG 2. Fifteen-year prostate cancer mortality was 8.4% (95% CI 5.3-11%) for GG 1, and 14% (7.5-21%) for GG 2. A total of 270 men with GG 1 underwent a biopsy after the TURP, and 162 (60%) had no cancer, in this group, prostate cancer mortality after 15 years was 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.8%). Men with post-TURP biopsy of GG ≥2 had a prostate cancer mortality of 30% (95% CI 9-50%) 15 years post-TURP. The major limitation was the heterogeneous follow-up, which could lead to an overestimation of prostate cancer mortality compared to a more standardized follow-up. Conclusions: We observed high prostate cancer mortality after TURP with GG 1 or 2, likely due to unsampled high-grade cancer in the peripheral zone. Patients with incidental prostate cancer should be further investigated to rule out high-grade cancer. For patients with GG 1 on TURP, once a subsequent biopsy does not show cancer, follow-up should be lessened similar to that of patients with an initial non-malignant biopsy.

KW - Incidental prostate cancer

KW - Prostate-cancer specific mortality

KW - Transurethral resection of the prostate

U2 - 10.1097/JU.0000000000004159

DO - 10.1097/JU.0000000000004159

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39083481

AN - SCOPUS:85201079940

JO - The Journal of Urology (Italian Edition)

JF - The Journal of Urology (Italian Edition)

SN - 1828-6593

M1 - 10.1097/JU.0000000000004159

ER -

ID: 402098175