Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A danish nationwide cohort study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes : A danish nationwide cohort study. / Schwartz, Brian; Pierce, Colin; Madelaire, Christian; Schou, Morten; Kristensen, Søren Lund; Gislason, Gunnar H.; Køber, Lars; Torp-Pedersen, Christian; Andersson, Charlotte.

I: Journal of the American Heart Association, Bind 10, Nr. 18, e021310, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schwartz, B, Pierce, C, Madelaire, C, Schou, M, Kristensen, SL, Gislason, GH, Køber, L, Torp-Pedersen, C & Andersson, C 2021, 'Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A danish nationwide cohort study', Journal of the American Heart Association, bind 10, nr. 18, e021310. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021310

APA

Schwartz, B., Pierce, C., Madelaire, C., Schou, M., Kristensen, S. L., Gislason, G. H., Køber, L., Torp-Pedersen, C., & Andersson, C. (2021). Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A danish nationwide cohort study. Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(18), [e021310]. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021310

Vancouver

Schwartz B, Pierce C, Madelaire C, Schou M, Kristensen SL, Gislason GH o.a. Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A danish nationwide cohort study. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(18). e021310. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021310

Author

Schwartz, Brian ; Pierce, Colin ; Madelaire, Christian ; Schou, Morten ; Kristensen, Søren Lund ; Gislason, Gunnar H. ; Køber, Lars ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian ; Andersson, Charlotte. / Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes : A danish nationwide cohort study. I: Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021 ; Bind 10, Nr. 18.

Bibtex

@article{3563d0a1ed0446e49a4a39e2d5e18ee4,
title = "Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A danish nationwide cohort study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Carvedilol may have favorable glycemic properties compared with metoprolol, but it is unknown if carvedilol has mortality benefit over metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish nationwide databases between 2010 and 2018, we followed patients with new-onset HFrEF treated with either carvedilol or metoprolol for all-cause mortality until the end of 2018. Follow-up started 120 days after initial HFrEF diagnosis to allow initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy. There were 39 260 patients on carvedilol or metoprolol at baseline (mean age 70.8 years, 35% women), of which 9355 (24%) had T2D. Carvedilol was used in 2989 (32%) patients with T2D and 10 411 (35%) of patients without T2D. Users of carvedilol had a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (20% versus 35%), but other characteristics appeared well-balanced between the groups. Totally 11 306 (29%) were deceased by the end of follow-up. We observed no mortality differences between carvedilol and metoprolol, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.97 (0.90–1.05) in patients with T2D versus 1.00 (0.95–1.05) for those without T2D, P for difference =0.99. Rates of new-onset T2D were lower in users of carvedilol versus metoprolol; age, sex, and calendar year adjusted HR 0.83 (0.75– 0.91), P<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary clinical cohort of HFrEF patients with and without T2D, carvedilol was not associated with a reduction in long-term mortality compared with metoprolol. However, carvedilol was associated with lowered risk of new-onset T2D supporting the assertion that carvedilol has a more favorable metabolic profile than metoprolol.",
keywords = "Carvedilol, Metoprolol, Mortality, Type 2 diabetes",
author = "Brian Schwartz and Colin Pierce and Christian Madelaire and Morten Schou and Kristensen, {S{\o}ren Lund} and Gislason, {Gunnar H.} and Lars K{\o}ber and Christian Torp-Pedersen and Charlotte Andersson",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.121.021310",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Journal of the American Heart Association",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "18",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term mortality associated with use of carvedilol versus metoprolol in heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes

T2 - A danish nationwide cohort study

AU - Schwartz, Brian

AU - Pierce, Colin

AU - Madelaire, Christian

AU - Schou, Morten

AU - Kristensen, Søren Lund

AU - Gislason, Gunnar H.

AU - Køber, Lars

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

AU - Andersson, Charlotte

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - BACKGROUND: Carvedilol may have favorable glycemic properties compared with metoprolol, but it is unknown if carvedilol has mortality benefit over metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish nationwide databases between 2010 and 2018, we followed patients with new-onset HFrEF treated with either carvedilol or metoprolol for all-cause mortality until the end of 2018. Follow-up started 120 days after initial HFrEF diagnosis to allow initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy. There were 39 260 patients on carvedilol or metoprolol at baseline (mean age 70.8 years, 35% women), of which 9355 (24%) had T2D. Carvedilol was used in 2989 (32%) patients with T2D and 10 411 (35%) of patients without T2D. Users of carvedilol had a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (20% versus 35%), but other characteristics appeared well-balanced between the groups. Totally 11 306 (29%) were deceased by the end of follow-up. We observed no mortality differences between carvedilol and metoprolol, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.97 (0.90–1.05) in patients with T2D versus 1.00 (0.95–1.05) for those without T2D, P for difference =0.99. Rates of new-onset T2D were lower in users of carvedilol versus metoprolol; age, sex, and calendar year adjusted HR 0.83 (0.75– 0.91), P<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary clinical cohort of HFrEF patients with and without T2D, carvedilol was not associated with a reduction in long-term mortality compared with metoprolol. However, carvedilol was associated with lowered risk of new-onset T2D supporting the assertion that carvedilol has a more favorable metabolic profile than metoprolol.

AB - BACKGROUND: Carvedilol may have favorable glycemic properties compared with metoprolol, but it is unknown if carvedilol has mortality benefit over metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish nationwide databases between 2010 and 2018, we followed patients with new-onset HFrEF treated with either carvedilol or metoprolol for all-cause mortality until the end of 2018. Follow-up started 120 days after initial HFrEF diagnosis to allow initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy. There were 39 260 patients on carvedilol or metoprolol at baseline (mean age 70.8 years, 35% women), of which 9355 (24%) had T2D. Carvedilol was used in 2989 (32%) patients with T2D and 10 411 (35%) of patients without T2D. Users of carvedilol had a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (20% versus 35%), but other characteristics appeared well-balanced between the groups. Totally 11 306 (29%) were deceased by the end of follow-up. We observed no mortality differences between carvedilol and metoprolol, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.97 (0.90–1.05) in patients with T2D versus 1.00 (0.95–1.05) for those without T2D, P for difference =0.99. Rates of new-onset T2D were lower in users of carvedilol versus metoprolol; age, sex, and calendar year adjusted HR 0.83 (0.75– 0.91), P<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary clinical cohort of HFrEF patients with and without T2D, carvedilol was not associated with a reduction in long-term mortality compared with metoprolol. However, carvedilol was associated with lowered risk of new-onset T2D supporting the assertion that carvedilol has a more favorable metabolic profile than metoprolol.

KW - Carvedilol

KW - Metoprolol

KW - Mortality

KW - Type 2 diabetes

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.121.021310

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.121.021310

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34533058

AN - SCOPUS:85117287078

VL - 10

JO - Journal of the American Heart Association

JF - Journal of the American Heart Association

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 18

M1 - e021310

ER -

ID: 301820951