Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes: Evidence from twins’ library borrowing

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes : Evidence from twins’ library borrowing. / Jæger, Mads Meier; Møllegaard, Stine; Blaabæk, Ea Hoppe.

I: PLoS ONE, Bind 19, Nr. 7, e0306546, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jæger, MM, Møllegaard, S & Blaabæk, EH 2024, 'Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes: Evidence from twins’ library borrowing', PLoS ONE, bind 19, nr. 7, e0306546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306546

APA

Jæger, M. M., Møllegaard, S., & Blaabæk, E. H. (2024). Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes: Evidence from twins’ library borrowing. PLoS ONE, 19(7), [e0306546]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306546

Vancouver

Jæger MM, Møllegaard S, Blaabæk EH. Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes: Evidence from twins’ library borrowing. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(7). e0306546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306546

Author

Jæger, Mads Meier ; Møllegaard, Stine ; Blaabæk, Ea Hoppe. / Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes : Evidence from twins’ library borrowing. I: PLoS ONE. 2024 ; Bind 19, Nr. 7.

Bibtex

@article{d0fe7eb7714d4696b9a2be41635a6c30,
title = "Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes: Evidence from twins{\textquoteright} library borrowing",
abstract = "Social science research argues that differences in individuals{\textquoteright} literary and cultural tastes originate in social environments. Yet, it might be that these differences are partly associated with genetic differences between individuals. To address this possibility, we use nation-scale registry data on library borrowing among Danish twins (N = 67,900) to assess the heritability of literary tastes. We measure literary tastes via borrowing of books of different genres (e.g., crime and biographical novels) and formats (physical, digital, and audio) and decompose the total variance in literary tastes into components attributable to shared genes (heritability), shared environments (social environment shared by siblings), and unique environments (social environments not shared by siblings). We find that genetic differences account for 45–70 percent of the total variance in literary tastes, shared environments account for almost none of the variance, and unique environments account for a moderate share. These results suggest that literary tastes are approximately as heritable as other human phenotypes (e.g., physical traits, cognition, and health). Moreover, heritability is higher for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups than for advantaged groups. Overall, our results suggest that research should consider the role of genetic differences in accounting for individual differences in literary and broader cultural tastes.",
author = "J{\ae}ger, {Mads Meier} and Stine M{\o}llegaard and Blaab{\ae}k, {Ea Hoppe}",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0306546",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Literary tastes are as heritable as other human phenotypes

T2 - Evidence from twins’ library borrowing

AU - Jæger, Mads Meier

AU - Møllegaard, Stine

AU - Blaabæk, Ea Hoppe

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Social science research argues that differences in individuals’ literary and cultural tastes originate in social environments. Yet, it might be that these differences are partly associated with genetic differences between individuals. To address this possibility, we use nation-scale registry data on library borrowing among Danish twins (N = 67,900) to assess the heritability of literary tastes. We measure literary tastes via borrowing of books of different genres (e.g., crime and biographical novels) and formats (physical, digital, and audio) and decompose the total variance in literary tastes into components attributable to shared genes (heritability), shared environments (social environment shared by siblings), and unique environments (social environments not shared by siblings). We find that genetic differences account for 45–70 percent of the total variance in literary tastes, shared environments account for almost none of the variance, and unique environments account for a moderate share. These results suggest that literary tastes are approximately as heritable as other human phenotypes (e.g., physical traits, cognition, and health). Moreover, heritability is higher for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups than for advantaged groups. Overall, our results suggest that research should consider the role of genetic differences in accounting for individual differences in literary and broader cultural tastes.

AB - Social science research argues that differences in individuals’ literary and cultural tastes originate in social environments. Yet, it might be that these differences are partly associated with genetic differences between individuals. To address this possibility, we use nation-scale registry data on library borrowing among Danish twins (N = 67,900) to assess the heritability of literary tastes. We measure literary tastes via borrowing of books of different genres (e.g., crime and biographical novels) and formats (physical, digital, and audio) and decompose the total variance in literary tastes into components attributable to shared genes (heritability), shared environments (social environment shared by siblings), and unique environments (social environments not shared by siblings). We find that genetic differences account for 45–70 percent of the total variance in literary tastes, shared environments account for almost none of the variance, and unique environments account for a moderate share. These results suggest that literary tastes are approximately as heritable as other human phenotypes (e.g., physical traits, cognition, and health). Moreover, heritability is higher for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups than for advantaged groups. Overall, our results suggest that research should consider the role of genetic differences in accounting for individual differences in literary and broader cultural tastes.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0306546

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0306546

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0306546

ER -

ID: 397889585