Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011. / Bergh, C.; Fenstad, Ann M.; Furnes, O.; Garellick, G.; Havelin, L. I.; Overgaard, Søren; Pedersen, A. B.; Makela, K. T.; Pulkkinen, P.; Mohaddes, M.; Karrholm, J.

I: Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition), Bind 85, Nr. 1, 2014, s. 11-17.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bergh, C, Fenstad, AM, Furnes, O, Garellick, G, Havelin, LI, Overgaard, S, Pedersen, AB, Makela, KT, Pulkkinen, P, Mohaddes, M & Karrholm, J 2014, 'Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011', Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition), bind 85, nr. 1, s. 11-17. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.874927

APA

Bergh, C., Fenstad, A. M., Furnes, O., Garellick, G., Havelin, L. I., Overgaard, S., Pedersen, A. B., Makela, K. T., Pulkkinen, P., Mohaddes, M., & Karrholm, J. (2014). Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011. Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition), 85(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.874927

Vancouver

Bergh C, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Overgaard S o.a. Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011. Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition). 2014;85(1):11-17. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.874927

Author

Bergh, C. ; Fenstad, Ann M. ; Furnes, O. ; Garellick, G. ; Havelin, L. I. ; Overgaard, Søren ; Pedersen, A. B. ; Makela, K. T. ; Pulkkinen, P. ; Mohaddes, M. ; Karrholm, J. / Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011. I: Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition). 2014 ; Bind 85, Nr. 1. s. 11-17.

Bibtex

@article{c397d380bc0f408aa43855022b926161,
title = "Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011",
abstract = "Background and purpose - Previous studies of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to femoral head necrosis (FHN) have shown an increased risk of revision compared to cases with primary osteoarthritis (POA), but recent studies have suggested that this procedure is not associated with poor outcome. We compared the risk of revision after operation with THA due to FHN or POA in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database including Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Patients and methods - 427,806 THAs performed between 1995 and 2011 were included. The relative risk of revision for any reason, for aseptic loosening, dislocation, deep infection, and periprosthetic fracture was studied before and after adjustment for covariates using Cox regression models. Results - 416,217 hips with POA (mean age 69 (SD 10), 59% females) and 11,589 with FHN (mean age 65 (SD 16), 58% females) were registered. The mean follow-up was 6.3 (SD 4.3) years. After 2 years of observation, 1.7% in the POA group and 3.0% in the FHN group had been revised. The corresponding proportions after 16 years of observation were 4.2% and 6.1%, respectively. The 16-year survival in the 2 groups was 86% (95% CI: 86-86) and 77% (CI: 74-80). After adjusting for covariates, the relative risk (RR) of revision for any reason was higher in patients with FHN for both periods studied (up to 2 years: RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.34-1.54; p <0.001; and 2-16 years: RR = 1.25, 1.14-1.38; p <0.001). Interpretation - Patients with FHN had an overall increased risk of revision. This increased risk persisted over the entire period of observation and covered more or less all of the 4 most common reasons for revision.",
author = "C. Bergh and Fenstad, {Ann M.} and O. Furnes and G. Garellick and Havelin, {L. I.} and S{\o}ren Overgaard and Pedersen, {A. B.} and Makela, {K. T.} and P. Pulkkinen and M. Mohaddes and J. Karrholm",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3109/17453674.2013.874927",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "11--17",
journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis 11,589 cases compared to 416,217 cases with primary osteoarthritis in the NARA database, 1995–2011

AU - Bergh, C.

AU - Fenstad, Ann M.

AU - Furnes, O.

AU - Garellick, G.

AU - Havelin, L. I.

AU - Overgaard, Søren

AU - Pedersen, A. B.

AU - Makela, K. T.

AU - Pulkkinen, P.

AU - Mohaddes, M.

AU - Karrholm, J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background and purpose - Previous studies of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to femoral head necrosis (FHN) have shown an increased risk of revision compared to cases with primary osteoarthritis (POA), but recent studies have suggested that this procedure is not associated with poor outcome. We compared the risk of revision after operation with THA due to FHN or POA in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database including Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Patients and methods - 427,806 THAs performed between 1995 and 2011 were included. The relative risk of revision for any reason, for aseptic loosening, dislocation, deep infection, and periprosthetic fracture was studied before and after adjustment for covariates using Cox regression models. Results - 416,217 hips with POA (mean age 69 (SD 10), 59% females) and 11,589 with FHN (mean age 65 (SD 16), 58% females) were registered. The mean follow-up was 6.3 (SD 4.3) years. After 2 years of observation, 1.7% in the POA group and 3.0% in the FHN group had been revised. The corresponding proportions after 16 years of observation were 4.2% and 6.1%, respectively. The 16-year survival in the 2 groups was 86% (95% CI: 86-86) and 77% (CI: 74-80). After adjusting for covariates, the relative risk (RR) of revision for any reason was higher in patients with FHN for both periods studied (up to 2 years: RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.34-1.54; p <0.001; and 2-16 years: RR = 1.25, 1.14-1.38; p <0.001). Interpretation - Patients with FHN had an overall increased risk of revision. This increased risk persisted over the entire period of observation and covered more or less all of the 4 most common reasons for revision.

AB - Background and purpose - Previous studies of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to femoral head necrosis (FHN) have shown an increased risk of revision compared to cases with primary osteoarthritis (POA), but recent studies have suggested that this procedure is not associated with poor outcome. We compared the risk of revision after operation with THA due to FHN or POA in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database including Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Patients and methods - 427,806 THAs performed between 1995 and 2011 were included. The relative risk of revision for any reason, for aseptic loosening, dislocation, deep infection, and periprosthetic fracture was studied before and after adjustment for covariates using Cox regression models. Results - 416,217 hips with POA (mean age 69 (SD 10), 59% females) and 11,589 with FHN (mean age 65 (SD 16), 58% females) were registered. The mean follow-up was 6.3 (SD 4.3) years. After 2 years of observation, 1.7% in the POA group and 3.0% in the FHN group had been revised. The corresponding proportions after 16 years of observation were 4.2% and 6.1%, respectively. The 16-year survival in the 2 groups was 86% (95% CI: 86-86) and 77% (CI: 74-80). After adjusting for covariates, the relative risk (RR) of revision for any reason was higher in patients with FHN for both periods studied (up to 2 years: RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.34-1.54; p <0.001; and 2-16 years: RR = 1.25, 1.14-1.38; p <0.001). Interpretation - Patients with FHN had an overall increased risk of revision. This increased risk persisted over the entire period of observation and covered more or less all of the 4 most common reasons for revision.

U2 - 10.3109/17453674.2013.874927

DO - 10.3109/17453674.2013.874927

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24359026

VL - 85

SP - 11

EP - 17

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3674

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 252051454