Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden. / Nilsen, Per; Seing, Ida; Ericsson, Carin; Andersen, Ove; Stefánsdóttir, Nina Thórný; Tjørnhøj-thomsen, Tine; Kallemose, Thomas; Kirk, Jeanette Wassar.

I: Implementation Science Communications, Bind 1, Nr. 1, 77, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nilsen, P, Seing, I, Ericsson, C, Andersen, O, Stefánsdóttir, NT, Tjørnhøj-thomsen, T, Kallemose, T & Kirk, JW 2020, 'Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden', Implementation Science Communications, bind 1, nr. 1, 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00065-x

APA

Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Andersen, O., Stefánsdóttir, N. T., Tjørnhøj-thomsen, T., Kallemose, T., & Kirk, J. W. (2020). Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), [77]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00065-x

Vancouver

Nilsen P, Seing I, Ericsson C, Andersen O, Stefánsdóttir NT, Tjørnhøj-thomsen T o.a. Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden. Implementation Science Communications. 2020;1(1). 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00065-x

Author

Nilsen, Per ; Seing, Ida ; Ericsson, Carin ; Andersen, Ove ; Stefánsdóttir, Nina Thórný ; Tjørnhøj-thomsen, Tine ; Kallemose, Thomas ; Kirk, Jeanette Wassar. / Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden. I: Implementation Science Communications. 2020 ; Bind 1, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{14ecc2da262645dc80042588ba0d8dba,
title = "Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden",
abstract = "BackgroundSocial distancing policies to ensure physical distance between people have become a crucial strategy in the battle against the spread of the coronavirus. The aim of this project is to analyze and compare social distancing policies implemented in Denmark and Sweden in 2020. Despite many similarities between the two countries, their response to the coronavirus pandemic differed markedly. Whereas authorities in Denmark initiated mandatory regulations and many severe restrictions, Swedish authorities predominantly promoted voluntary recommendations.MethodsThe project is an interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers in Denmark and Sweden with different disciplinary backgrounds. The project is based on a comparative analysis, an approach that attempts to reach conclusions beyond single cases and to explain differences and similarities between objects of analysis and relations between objects against the backdrop of their contextual conditions. Data will be gathered by means of document analysis, qualitative interviews, and a questionnaire survey to address three research questions: (1) What social distancing policies regarding the coronavirus have been formulated and implemented, who are the policymakers behind the policy measures, which implementers are expected to implement the measures, and who are the targets that the measures ultimately seek to influence? (2) How have the social distancing policies and policy measures been justified, and what types of knowledge form the basis for the measures? and (3) What are the differences and similarities in citizens{\textquoteright} perceptions of acceptability and compliance with social distancing policy measures in relation to the coronavirus?DiscussionTo create a structure for addressing the three research questions, the project applies a theoretical framework informed by the policy and implementation science literatures. The framework consists of five interdependent domains that have an impact on policy implementation: (1) policymakers, (2) policy characteristics, (3) implementers, (4) targets, and (5) policy environment. Details of the framework are provided in the article.",
author = "Per Nilsen and Ida Seing and Carin Ericsson and Ove Andersen and Stef{\'a}nsd{\'o}ttir, {Nina Th{\'o}rn{\'y}} and Tine Tj{\o}rnh{\o}j-thomsen and Thomas Kallemose and Kirk, {Jeanette Wassar}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1186/s43058-020-00065-x",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Implementation Science Communications",
issn = "2662-2211",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden

AU - Nilsen, Per

AU - Seing, Ida

AU - Ericsson, Carin

AU - Andersen, Ove

AU - Stefánsdóttir, Nina Thórný

AU - Tjørnhøj-thomsen, Tine

AU - Kallemose, Thomas

AU - Kirk, Jeanette Wassar

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - BackgroundSocial distancing policies to ensure physical distance between people have become a crucial strategy in the battle against the spread of the coronavirus. The aim of this project is to analyze and compare social distancing policies implemented in Denmark and Sweden in 2020. Despite many similarities between the two countries, their response to the coronavirus pandemic differed markedly. Whereas authorities in Denmark initiated mandatory regulations and many severe restrictions, Swedish authorities predominantly promoted voluntary recommendations.MethodsThe project is an interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers in Denmark and Sweden with different disciplinary backgrounds. The project is based on a comparative analysis, an approach that attempts to reach conclusions beyond single cases and to explain differences and similarities between objects of analysis and relations between objects against the backdrop of their contextual conditions. Data will be gathered by means of document analysis, qualitative interviews, and a questionnaire survey to address three research questions: (1) What social distancing policies regarding the coronavirus have been formulated and implemented, who are the policymakers behind the policy measures, which implementers are expected to implement the measures, and who are the targets that the measures ultimately seek to influence? (2) How have the social distancing policies and policy measures been justified, and what types of knowledge form the basis for the measures? and (3) What are the differences and similarities in citizens’ perceptions of acceptability and compliance with social distancing policy measures in relation to the coronavirus?DiscussionTo create a structure for addressing the three research questions, the project applies a theoretical framework informed by the policy and implementation science literatures. The framework consists of five interdependent domains that have an impact on policy implementation: (1) policymakers, (2) policy characteristics, (3) implementers, (4) targets, and (5) policy environment. Details of the framework are provided in the article.

AB - BackgroundSocial distancing policies to ensure physical distance between people have become a crucial strategy in the battle against the spread of the coronavirus. The aim of this project is to analyze and compare social distancing policies implemented in Denmark and Sweden in 2020. Despite many similarities between the two countries, their response to the coronavirus pandemic differed markedly. Whereas authorities in Denmark initiated mandatory regulations and many severe restrictions, Swedish authorities predominantly promoted voluntary recommendations.MethodsThe project is an interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers in Denmark and Sweden with different disciplinary backgrounds. The project is based on a comparative analysis, an approach that attempts to reach conclusions beyond single cases and to explain differences and similarities between objects of analysis and relations between objects against the backdrop of their contextual conditions. Data will be gathered by means of document analysis, qualitative interviews, and a questionnaire survey to address three research questions: (1) What social distancing policies regarding the coronavirus have been formulated and implemented, who are the policymakers behind the policy measures, which implementers are expected to implement the measures, and who are the targets that the measures ultimately seek to influence? (2) How have the social distancing policies and policy measures been justified, and what types of knowledge form the basis for the measures? and (3) What are the differences and similarities in citizens’ perceptions of acceptability and compliance with social distancing policy measures in relation to the coronavirus?DiscussionTo create a structure for addressing the three research questions, the project applies a theoretical framework informed by the policy and implementation science literatures. The framework consists of five interdependent domains that have an impact on policy implementation: (1) policymakers, (2) policy characteristics, (3) implementers, (4) targets, and (5) policy environment. Details of the framework are provided in the article.

U2 - 10.1186/s43058-020-00065-x

DO - 10.1186/s43058-020-00065-x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32968739

VL - 1

JO - Implementation Science Communications

JF - Implementation Science Communications

SN - 2662-2211

IS - 1

M1 - 77

ER -

ID: 255839232