Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device. / Pracoń, Radosław; De Backer, Ole; Konka, Marek; Kępka, Cezary; Kruk, Mariusz; Trochimiuk, Piotr; Dębski, Mariusz; Dzielińska, Zofia; Søndergaard, Lars; Demkow, Marcin.

I: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Bind 98, Nr. 3, 2021, s. E420-E426.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pracoń, R, De Backer, O, Konka, M, Kępka, C, Kruk, M, Trochimiuk, P, Dębski, M, Dzielińska, Z, Søndergaard, L & Demkow, M 2021, 'Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, bind 98, nr. 3, s. E420-E426. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29393

APA

Pracoń, R., De Backer, O., Konka, M., Kępka, C., Kruk, M., Trochimiuk, P., Dębski, M., Dzielińska, Z., Søndergaard, L., & Demkow, M. (2021). Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 98(3), E420-E426. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29393

Vancouver

Pracoń R, De Backer O, Konka M, Kępka C, Kruk M, Trochimiuk P o.a. Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;98(3):E420-E426. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29393

Author

Pracoń, Radosław ; De Backer, Ole ; Konka, Marek ; Kępka, Cezary ; Kruk, Mariusz ; Trochimiuk, Piotr ; Dębski, Mariusz ; Dzielińska, Zofia ; Søndergaard, Lars ; Demkow, Marcin. / Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device. I: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021 ; Bind 98, Nr. 3. s. E420-E426.

Bibtex

@article{5a40684a257b413eb72607f3e162055c,
title = "Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer{\texttrademark} Amulet{\texttrademark} device",
abstract = "Objectives: This study aimed to find imaging risk features for device related-pulmonary artery (PA) injury (DR-PAI) in patients after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Background: Cardiac tamponade resulting from DR-PAI is a rare but life-threatening complication of LAAC. Methods: In vitro analysis of Amplatzer{\texttrademark} Amulet{\texttrademark} (Abbott, MN) device was done. Measurements of the distance between PA and Amplatzer lobe at its middle part, distal part, and along the stabilizing wires' trajectory (wires-to-PA distance) were taken in 100 consecutive patients on post-LAAC computed tomography (CT) studies. Clinical outcomes were collected. Results: In vitro analysis indicated that both middle and distal lobe had to be in close PA proximity (<1.5 mm) for the stabilizing wires to cause risk for DR-PAI, configuration called ''cuddling lobe orientation''. On CT measurements middle lobe-PA distance was 4.7 mm (IQR = 2.7–9.5), with close proximity in 4 (4%) patients, and distal lobe-PA distance was 3.2 mm (IQR = 1.8–7.2 mm), with close proximity in 17 (17%) patients. Stabilizing wires were pointing toward PA in 47 patients (47%) with median wire-to-PA distance 5.7 mm (IQR = 3.6–8.5 mm). ''Cuddling'' was found in 2 (2%) patients and resulted in shorter wires-to-PA distance vs no ''cuddling'' group (2.3 vs 5.8 mm p <.01). At 2.9 ± 1.0 yrs of follow-up, the two patients with ''cuddling lobe orientation'' on post-LAAC CT scan developed late cardiac tamponades (p <.001). One of those required surgery, which confirmed DR-PAI. Conclusions: ''Cuddling lobe orientation'' of Amulet device with the PA was associated with short wires-to-PA distance and late pericardial effusions, including DR-PAI. Hence, such device-to-PA configuration should be avoided.",
keywords = "cardiac computed tomography, cardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion, transcatheter structural heart interventions.",
author = "Rados{\l}aw Praco{\'n} and {De Backer}, Ole and Marek Konka and Cezary K{\c e}pka and Mariusz Kruk and Piotr Trochimiuk and Mariusz D{\c e}bski and Zofia Dzieli{\'n}ska and Lars S{\o}ndergaard and Marcin Demkow",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.29393",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "E420--E426",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging risk features for device related pulmonary artery injury after left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device

AU - Pracoń, Radosław

AU - De Backer, Ole

AU - Konka, Marek

AU - Kępka, Cezary

AU - Kruk, Mariusz

AU - Trochimiuk, Piotr

AU - Dębski, Mariusz

AU - Dzielińska, Zofia

AU - Søndergaard, Lars

AU - Demkow, Marcin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Objectives: This study aimed to find imaging risk features for device related-pulmonary artery (PA) injury (DR-PAI) in patients after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Background: Cardiac tamponade resulting from DR-PAI is a rare but life-threatening complication of LAAC. Methods: In vitro analysis of Amplatzer™ Amulet™ (Abbott, MN) device was done. Measurements of the distance between PA and Amplatzer lobe at its middle part, distal part, and along the stabilizing wires' trajectory (wires-to-PA distance) were taken in 100 consecutive patients on post-LAAC computed tomography (CT) studies. Clinical outcomes were collected. Results: In vitro analysis indicated that both middle and distal lobe had to be in close PA proximity (<1.5 mm) for the stabilizing wires to cause risk for DR-PAI, configuration called ''cuddling lobe orientation''. On CT measurements middle lobe-PA distance was 4.7 mm (IQR = 2.7–9.5), with close proximity in 4 (4%) patients, and distal lobe-PA distance was 3.2 mm (IQR = 1.8–7.2 mm), with close proximity in 17 (17%) patients. Stabilizing wires were pointing toward PA in 47 patients (47%) with median wire-to-PA distance 5.7 mm (IQR = 3.6–8.5 mm). ''Cuddling'' was found in 2 (2%) patients and resulted in shorter wires-to-PA distance vs no ''cuddling'' group (2.3 vs 5.8 mm p <.01). At 2.9 ± 1.0 yrs of follow-up, the two patients with ''cuddling lobe orientation'' on post-LAAC CT scan developed late cardiac tamponades (p <.001). One of those required surgery, which confirmed DR-PAI. Conclusions: ''Cuddling lobe orientation'' of Amulet device with the PA was associated with short wires-to-PA distance and late pericardial effusions, including DR-PAI. Hence, such device-to-PA configuration should be avoided.

AB - Objectives: This study aimed to find imaging risk features for device related-pulmonary artery (PA) injury (DR-PAI) in patients after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Background: Cardiac tamponade resulting from DR-PAI is a rare but life-threatening complication of LAAC. Methods: In vitro analysis of Amplatzer™ Amulet™ (Abbott, MN) device was done. Measurements of the distance between PA and Amplatzer lobe at its middle part, distal part, and along the stabilizing wires' trajectory (wires-to-PA distance) were taken in 100 consecutive patients on post-LAAC computed tomography (CT) studies. Clinical outcomes were collected. Results: In vitro analysis indicated that both middle and distal lobe had to be in close PA proximity (<1.5 mm) for the stabilizing wires to cause risk for DR-PAI, configuration called ''cuddling lobe orientation''. On CT measurements middle lobe-PA distance was 4.7 mm (IQR = 2.7–9.5), with close proximity in 4 (4%) patients, and distal lobe-PA distance was 3.2 mm (IQR = 1.8–7.2 mm), with close proximity in 17 (17%) patients. Stabilizing wires were pointing toward PA in 47 patients (47%) with median wire-to-PA distance 5.7 mm (IQR = 3.6–8.5 mm). ''Cuddling'' was found in 2 (2%) patients and resulted in shorter wires-to-PA distance vs no ''cuddling'' group (2.3 vs 5.8 mm p <.01). At 2.9 ± 1.0 yrs of follow-up, the two patients with ''cuddling lobe orientation'' on post-LAAC CT scan developed late cardiac tamponades (p <.001). One of those required surgery, which confirmed DR-PAI. Conclusions: ''Cuddling lobe orientation'' of Amulet device with the PA was associated with short wires-to-PA distance and late pericardial effusions, including DR-PAI. Hence, such device-to-PA configuration should be avoided.

KW - cardiac computed tomography

KW - cardiac tamponade

KW - pericardial effusion

KW - transcatheter structural heart interventions.

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.29393

DO - 10.1002/ccd.29393

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33220011

AN - SCOPUS:85096743278

VL - 98

SP - E420-E426

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 303673299