Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology : a national needs assessment. / Nayahangan, Leizl Joy; Bølling Hansen, Rikke; Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen, Karen; Paltved, Charlotte; Nielsen, Bjørn Ulrik; Konge, Lars.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Urology, Bind 51, Nr. 6, 2017, s. 484-490.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nayahangan, LJ, Bølling Hansen, R, Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen, K, Paltved, C, Nielsen, BU & Konge, L 2017, 'Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment', Scandinavian Journal of Urology, bind 51, nr. 6, s. 484-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2017.1352618

APA

Nayahangan, L. J., Bølling Hansen, R., Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen, K., Paltved, C., Nielsen, B. U., & Konge, L. (2017). Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 51(6), 484-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2017.1352618

Vancouver

Nayahangan LJ, Bølling Hansen R, Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen K, Paltved C, Nielsen BU, Konge L. Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2017;51(6):484-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2017.1352618

Author

Nayahangan, Leizl Joy ; Bølling Hansen, Rikke ; Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen, Karen ; Paltved, Charlotte ; Nielsen, Bjørn Ulrik ; Konge, Lars. / Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology : a national needs assessment. I: Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2017 ; Bind 51, Nr. 6. s. 484-490.

Bibtex

@article{7bca760c240c4128ab2eacce67ea3bf0,
title = "Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment",
abstract = "Objective: Simulation-based training is well recognized in the transforming field of urological surgery; however, integration into the curriculum is often unstructured. Development of simulation-based curricula should follow a stepwise approach starting with a needs assessment. This study aimed to identify technical procedures in urology that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum for residency training. Materials and methods: A national needs assessment was performed using the Delphi method involving 56 experts with significant roles in the education of urologists. Round 1 identified technical procedures that newly qualified urologists should perform. Round 2 included a survey using an established needs assessment formula to explore: the frequency of procedures; the number of physicians who should be able to perform the procedure; the risk and/or discomfort to patients when a procedure is performed by an inexperienced physician; and the feasibility of simulation training. Round 3 involved elimination and reranking of procedures according to priority. Results: The response rates for the three Delphi rounds were 70%, 55% and 67%, respectively. The 34 procedures identified in Round 1 were reduced to a final prioritized list of 18 technical procedures for simulation-based training. The five procedures that reached the highest prioritization were cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate, placement of ureteral stent, insertion of urethral and suprapubic catheter, and transurethral resection of the bladder. Conclusion: The prioritized list of technical procedures in urology that were identified as highly suitable for simulation can be used as an aid in the planning and development of simulation-based training programs.",
keywords = "Curriculum development, needs assessment, simulation, simulation-based training, urology training",
author = "Nayahangan, {Leizl Joy} and {B{\o}lling Hansen}, Rikke and {Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen}, Karen and Charlotte Paltved and Nielsen, {Bj{\o}rn Ulrik} and Lars Konge",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/21681805.2017.1352618",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "484--490",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Urology",
issn = "2168-1805",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology

T2 - a national needs assessment

AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy

AU - Bølling Hansen, Rikke

AU - Gilboe Lindorff-Larsen, Karen

AU - Paltved, Charlotte

AU - Nielsen, Bjørn Ulrik

AU - Konge, Lars

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: Simulation-based training is well recognized in the transforming field of urological surgery; however, integration into the curriculum is often unstructured. Development of simulation-based curricula should follow a stepwise approach starting with a needs assessment. This study aimed to identify technical procedures in urology that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum for residency training. Materials and methods: A national needs assessment was performed using the Delphi method involving 56 experts with significant roles in the education of urologists. Round 1 identified technical procedures that newly qualified urologists should perform. Round 2 included a survey using an established needs assessment formula to explore: the frequency of procedures; the number of physicians who should be able to perform the procedure; the risk and/or discomfort to patients when a procedure is performed by an inexperienced physician; and the feasibility of simulation training. Round 3 involved elimination and reranking of procedures according to priority. Results: The response rates for the three Delphi rounds were 70%, 55% and 67%, respectively. The 34 procedures identified in Round 1 were reduced to a final prioritized list of 18 technical procedures for simulation-based training. The five procedures that reached the highest prioritization were cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate, placement of ureteral stent, insertion of urethral and suprapubic catheter, and transurethral resection of the bladder. Conclusion: The prioritized list of technical procedures in urology that were identified as highly suitable for simulation can be used as an aid in the planning and development of simulation-based training programs.

AB - Objective: Simulation-based training is well recognized in the transforming field of urological surgery; however, integration into the curriculum is often unstructured. Development of simulation-based curricula should follow a stepwise approach starting with a needs assessment. This study aimed to identify technical procedures in urology that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum for residency training. Materials and methods: A national needs assessment was performed using the Delphi method involving 56 experts with significant roles in the education of urologists. Round 1 identified technical procedures that newly qualified urologists should perform. Round 2 included a survey using an established needs assessment formula to explore: the frequency of procedures; the number of physicians who should be able to perform the procedure; the risk and/or discomfort to patients when a procedure is performed by an inexperienced physician; and the feasibility of simulation training. Round 3 involved elimination and reranking of procedures according to priority. Results: The response rates for the three Delphi rounds were 70%, 55% and 67%, respectively. The 34 procedures identified in Round 1 were reduced to a final prioritized list of 18 technical procedures for simulation-based training. The five procedures that reached the highest prioritization were cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate, placement of ureteral stent, insertion of urethral and suprapubic catheter, and transurethral resection of the bladder. Conclusion: The prioritized list of technical procedures in urology that were identified as highly suitable for simulation can be used as an aid in the planning and development of simulation-based training programs.

KW - Curriculum development

KW - needs assessment

KW - simulation

KW - simulation-based training

KW - urology training

U2 - 10.1080/21681805.2017.1352618

DO - 10.1080/21681805.2017.1352618

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28743217

AN - SCOPUS:85026270051

VL - 51

SP - 484

EP - 490

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Urology

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Urology

SN - 2168-1805

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 189293820