Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Husserl and Disjunctivism : Reply to Bower. / Overgaard, Søren.
I: Journal of the History of Philosophy, Bind 61, Nr. 3, 2023, s. 499-513.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Husserl and Disjunctivism
T2 - Reply to Bower
AU - Overgaard, Søren
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Matt Bower argues forcefully against A. D. Smith's interpretation of Husserl as a disjunctivist. But I argue in this discussion note that the disjunctive reading of Husserl remains plausible. For it seems Husserl was committed to the idea that perceptions essentially have singular contents, while hallucinations do not.
AB - In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Matt Bower argues forcefully against A. D. Smith's interpretation of Husserl as a disjunctivist. But I argue in this discussion note that the disjunctive reading of Husserl remains plausible. For it seems Husserl was committed to the idea that perceptions essentially have singular contents, while hallucinations do not.
U2 - 10.1353/hph.2023.a902881
DO - 10.1353/hph.2023.a902881
M3 - Journal article
VL - 61
SP - 499
EP - 513
JO - Journal of the History of Philosophy
JF - Journal of the History of Philosophy
SN - 0022-5053
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 307125892