How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Facts and Misconceptions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves : Facts and Misconceptions. / Capodanno, Davide; Søndergaard, Lars.

I: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Bind 13, Nr. 2, 2020, s. 257-260.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Capodanno, D & Søndergaard, L 2020, 'How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Facts and Misconceptions', JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, bind 13, nr. 2, s. 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025

APA

Capodanno, D., & Søndergaard, L. (2020). How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Facts and Misconceptions. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 13(2), 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025

Vancouver

Capodanno D, Søndergaard L. How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Facts and Misconceptions. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020;13(2):257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025

Author

Capodanno, Davide ; Søndergaard, Lars. / How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves : Facts and Misconceptions. I: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020 ; Bind 13, Nr. 2. s. 257-260.

Bibtex

@article{190e7925a82e4f7cb46ea16bcc3cdf37,
title = "How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Facts and Misconceptions",
abstract = "In the evolving scenario of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the topic of bioprosthetic valve durability is becoming increasingly important. Unfortunately, the definition of long-term durability of surgical and transcatheter bioprostheses has been inconsistent over time. Comparative studies of TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement, or studies comparing TAVR devices, would benefit from the use of standardized definitions of valve durability. The definitions of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) have been endorsed by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and embraced by many investigators worldwide. In this viewpoint, the authors discuss the strengths and limitations of such approach, which is intended to balance the need for accuracy and simplicity in reporting of long-term durability.",
keywords = "bioprosthesis, definitions, durability, valve",
author = "Davide Capodanno and Lars S{\o}ndergaard",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "257--260",
journal = "J A C C: Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1936-8798",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to Define Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

T2 - Facts and Misconceptions

AU - Capodanno, Davide

AU - Søndergaard, Lars

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In the evolving scenario of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the topic of bioprosthetic valve durability is becoming increasingly important. Unfortunately, the definition of long-term durability of surgical and transcatheter bioprostheses has been inconsistent over time. Comparative studies of TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement, or studies comparing TAVR devices, would benefit from the use of standardized definitions of valve durability. The definitions of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) have been endorsed by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and embraced by many investigators worldwide. In this viewpoint, the authors discuss the strengths and limitations of such approach, which is intended to balance the need for accuracy and simplicity in reporting of long-term durability.

AB - In the evolving scenario of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the topic of bioprosthetic valve durability is becoming increasingly important. Unfortunately, the definition of long-term durability of surgical and transcatheter bioprostheses has been inconsistent over time. Comparative studies of TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement, or studies comparing TAVR devices, would benefit from the use of standardized definitions of valve durability. The definitions of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure developed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) have been endorsed by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and embraced by many investigators worldwide. In this viewpoint, the authors discuss the strengths and limitations of such approach, which is intended to balance the need for accuracy and simplicity in reporting of long-term durability.

KW - bioprosthesis

KW - definitions

KW - durability

KW - valve

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.025

M3 - Review

C2 - 31973798

AN - SCOPUS:85077657548

VL - 13

SP - 257

EP - 260

JO - J A C C: Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - J A C C: Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1936-8798

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 260253885