Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation : A retrospective review of 1128 patients. / Hemmingsen, Mathilde N; Larsen, Andreas; Ørholt, Mathias; Rasmussen, Louise E; Weltz, Tim K; Andersen, Peter S; Sarmady, Faye; Elberg, Jens Jørgen; Vester-Glowinski, Peter V; Herly, Mikkel.

I: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, Bind 75, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 1197-1203.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hemmingsen, MN, Larsen, A, Ørholt, M, Rasmussen, LE, Weltz, TK, Andersen, PS, Sarmady, F, Elberg, JJ, Vester-Glowinski, PV & Herly, M 2022, 'Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients', Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, bind 75, nr. 3, s. 1197-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067

APA

Hemmingsen, M. N., Larsen, A., Ørholt, M., Rasmussen, L. E., Weltz, T. K., Andersen, P. S., Sarmady, F., Elberg, J. J., Vester-Glowinski, P. V., & Herly, M. (2022). Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 75(3), 1197-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067

Vancouver

Hemmingsen MN, Larsen A, Ørholt M, Rasmussen LE, Weltz TK, Andersen PS o.a. Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2022;75(3):1197-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067

Author

Hemmingsen, Mathilde N ; Larsen, Andreas ; Ørholt, Mathias ; Rasmussen, Louise E ; Weltz, Tim K ; Andersen, Peter S ; Sarmady, Faye ; Elberg, Jens Jørgen ; Vester-Glowinski, Peter V ; Herly, Mikkel. / Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation : A retrospective review of 1128 patients. I: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2022 ; Bind 75, Nr. 3. s. 1197-1203.

Bibtex

@article{bf31ae4873294f5ba246743d4d444a01,
title = "Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed cosmetic surgery worldwide. Some of the most severe short-term complications after breast augmentation are hematoma and deep surgical site infection. However, these complications are relatively rare; therefore, large patient populations are required to perform statistical analyses. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of the complications after primary breast augmentation with an emphasis on deep surgical site infection and hematoma.METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women who underwent primary breast augmentation without the use of pocket irrigation between 2012 and 2019 in a single private clinic. A cumulative hazard function and a multivariate analysis on the risk of hematoma were performed.RESULTS: We included 1128 patients in the study. Thirty patients (2.7%) developed postoperative hematoma after a median time of 14 h (IQR 5 h-9 days). Six patients (0.5%) contracted a deep surgical site infection after a median time of 14 days (range 4-41 days). Age, BMI, implant volume, or implant placement was not significantly associated with hematoma.CONCLUSION: Our findings support that the risk of hematoma after primary breast augmentation is highest within the first 24 h after the surgery. This time period should be considered when planning postoperative care for these patients. We did not find an increased rate of deep surgical site infection compared with studies of breast augmentations with pocket irrigation. Further studies and meta-analyses are needed to explore the effect of pocket irrigation and other risk factors.",
keywords = "Breast Implantation/adverse effects, Breast Implants/adverse effects, Female, Hematoma/etiology, Humans, Mammaplasty/adverse effects, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology",
author = "Hemmingsen, {Mathilde N} and Andreas Larsen and Mathias {\O}rholt and Rasmussen, {Louise E} and Weltz, {Tim K} and Andersen, {Peter S} and Faye Sarmady and Elberg, {Jens J{\o}rgen} and Vester-Glowinski, {Peter V} and Mikkel Herly",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "1197--1203",
journal = "Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS",
issn = "1748-6815",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation

T2 - A retrospective review of 1128 patients

AU - Hemmingsen, Mathilde N

AU - Larsen, Andreas

AU - Ørholt, Mathias

AU - Rasmussen, Louise E

AU - Weltz, Tim K

AU - Andersen, Peter S

AU - Sarmady, Faye

AU - Elberg, Jens Jørgen

AU - Vester-Glowinski, Peter V

AU - Herly, Mikkel

N1 - Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed cosmetic surgery worldwide. Some of the most severe short-term complications after breast augmentation are hematoma and deep surgical site infection. However, these complications are relatively rare; therefore, large patient populations are required to perform statistical analyses. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of the complications after primary breast augmentation with an emphasis on deep surgical site infection and hematoma.METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women who underwent primary breast augmentation without the use of pocket irrigation between 2012 and 2019 in a single private clinic. A cumulative hazard function and a multivariate analysis on the risk of hematoma were performed.RESULTS: We included 1128 patients in the study. Thirty patients (2.7%) developed postoperative hematoma after a median time of 14 h (IQR 5 h-9 days). Six patients (0.5%) contracted a deep surgical site infection after a median time of 14 days (range 4-41 days). Age, BMI, implant volume, or implant placement was not significantly associated with hematoma.CONCLUSION: Our findings support that the risk of hematoma after primary breast augmentation is highest within the first 24 h after the surgery. This time period should be considered when planning postoperative care for these patients. We did not find an increased rate of deep surgical site infection compared with studies of breast augmentations with pocket irrigation. Further studies and meta-analyses are needed to explore the effect of pocket irrigation and other risk factors.

AB - BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed cosmetic surgery worldwide. Some of the most severe short-term complications after breast augmentation are hematoma and deep surgical site infection. However, these complications are relatively rare; therefore, large patient populations are required to perform statistical analyses. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of the complications after primary breast augmentation with an emphasis on deep surgical site infection and hematoma.METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women who underwent primary breast augmentation without the use of pocket irrigation between 2012 and 2019 in a single private clinic. A cumulative hazard function and a multivariate analysis on the risk of hematoma were performed.RESULTS: We included 1128 patients in the study. Thirty patients (2.7%) developed postoperative hematoma after a median time of 14 h (IQR 5 h-9 days). Six patients (0.5%) contracted a deep surgical site infection after a median time of 14 days (range 4-41 days). Age, BMI, implant volume, or implant placement was not significantly associated with hematoma.CONCLUSION: Our findings support that the risk of hematoma after primary breast augmentation is highest within the first 24 h after the surgery. This time period should be considered when planning postoperative care for these patients. We did not find an increased rate of deep surgical site infection compared with studies of breast augmentations with pocket irrigation. Further studies and meta-analyses are needed to explore the effect of pocket irrigation and other risk factors.

KW - Breast Implantation/adverse effects

KW - Breast Implants/adverse effects

KW - Female

KW - Hematoma/etiology

KW - Humans

KW - Mammaplasty/adverse effects

KW - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067

DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34924323

VL - 75

SP - 1197

EP - 1203

JO - Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS

JF - Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS

SN - 1748-6815

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 345414560