Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status : comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies. / Bliddal, Sofie; Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla; Boas, Malene; Faber, Jens; Juul, Anders; Larsen, Torben; Precht, Dorthe Hansen.

I: European Journal of Endocrinology, Bind 170, Nr. 2, 02.2014, s. 329-339.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bliddal, S, Feldt-Rasmussen, U, Boas, M, Faber, J, Juul, A, Larsen, T & Precht, DH 2014, 'Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies', European Journal of Endocrinology, bind 170, nr. 2, s. 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0672

APA

Bliddal, S., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Boas, M., Faber, J., Juul, A., Larsen, T., & Precht, D. H. (2014). Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies. European Journal of Endocrinology, 170(2), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0672

Vancouver

Bliddal S, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Boas M, Faber J, Juul A, Larsen T o.a. Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2014 feb.;170(2):329-339. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0672

Author

Bliddal, Sofie ; Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla ; Boas, Malene ; Faber, Jens ; Juul, Anders ; Larsen, Torben ; Precht, Dorthe Hansen. / Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status : comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies. I: European Journal of Endocrinology. 2014 ; Bind 170, Nr. 2. s. 329-339.

Bibtex

@article{c117d9889e0c455fb2702dafed77fdd9,
title = "Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Correct interpretation of thyroid status during pregnancy is vital to secure fetal development. Pregnancy-related changes in maternal thyroid status necessitate the use of gestational age-specific reference ranges. In this study, we investigated between-laboratory reproducibility of thyroid reference ranges in pregnant women.DESIGN: Comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies including 255 (cohort 1) and 101 (cohort 2) healthy antibody-negative Danish pregnant women attending prenatal care at Copenhagen University Hospital.METHODS: Different immunoassays were used to measure thyroid hormone levels in the two cohorts. Thyroid hormone reference ranges were established for every 5 weeks of gestation. Differences between cohorts were explored through mixed-model repeated measures regression analyses. By applying reference ranges from one cohort to the other, the proportion of women who would be misclassified by doing so was investigated.RESULTS: TSH increased and free thyroxine (FT4) decreased as pregnancy progressed. Results indicated highly significant differences between cohorts in free triiodothyronine (F=21.3, P<0.001) and FT4 (F=941, P<0.001). TSH levels were comparable (P=0.09). Up to 90.3% of the women had FT4 levels outside their laboratory's nonpregnant reference range, and up to 100% outside the other cohort's gestational-age-specific reference ranges. Z-score-based reference ranges markedly improved comparison between cohorts.CONCLUSION: Even in the same region, the use of gestational-age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories led to misclassification. Up to 100% of maternal FT4 levels fell outside the other cohort's reference range despite similar TSH levels. In clinical practice, thyroid testing of pregnant women without adding method specificity to gestational age-dependent reference ranges will compromise patient safety.",
keywords = "Adult, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Fluoroimmunoassay, Gestational Age, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Luminescent Measurements, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyroid Gland, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Triiodothyronine",
author = "Sofie Bliddal and Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen and Malene Boas and Jens Faber and Anders Juul and Torben Larsen and Precht, {Dorthe Hansen}",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1530/EJE-13-0672",
language = "English",
volume = "170",
pages = "329--339",
journal = "European Journal of Endocrinology",
issn = "0804-4643",
publisher = "BioScientifica Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status

T2 - comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies

AU - Bliddal, Sofie

AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla

AU - Boas, Malene

AU - Faber, Jens

AU - Juul, Anders

AU - Larsen, Torben

AU - Precht, Dorthe Hansen

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Correct interpretation of thyroid status during pregnancy is vital to secure fetal development. Pregnancy-related changes in maternal thyroid status necessitate the use of gestational age-specific reference ranges. In this study, we investigated between-laboratory reproducibility of thyroid reference ranges in pregnant women.DESIGN: Comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies including 255 (cohort 1) and 101 (cohort 2) healthy antibody-negative Danish pregnant women attending prenatal care at Copenhagen University Hospital.METHODS: Different immunoassays were used to measure thyroid hormone levels in the two cohorts. Thyroid hormone reference ranges were established for every 5 weeks of gestation. Differences between cohorts were explored through mixed-model repeated measures regression analyses. By applying reference ranges from one cohort to the other, the proportion of women who would be misclassified by doing so was investigated.RESULTS: TSH increased and free thyroxine (FT4) decreased as pregnancy progressed. Results indicated highly significant differences between cohorts in free triiodothyronine (F=21.3, P<0.001) and FT4 (F=941, P<0.001). TSH levels were comparable (P=0.09). Up to 90.3% of the women had FT4 levels outside their laboratory's nonpregnant reference range, and up to 100% outside the other cohort's gestational-age-specific reference ranges. Z-score-based reference ranges markedly improved comparison between cohorts.CONCLUSION: Even in the same region, the use of gestational-age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories led to misclassification. Up to 100% of maternal FT4 levels fell outside the other cohort's reference range despite similar TSH levels. In clinical practice, thyroid testing of pregnant women without adding method specificity to gestational age-dependent reference ranges will compromise patient safety.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Correct interpretation of thyroid status during pregnancy is vital to secure fetal development. Pregnancy-related changes in maternal thyroid status necessitate the use of gestational age-specific reference ranges. In this study, we investigated between-laboratory reproducibility of thyroid reference ranges in pregnant women.DESIGN: Comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies including 255 (cohort 1) and 101 (cohort 2) healthy antibody-negative Danish pregnant women attending prenatal care at Copenhagen University Hospital.METHODS: Different immunoassays were used to measure thyroid hormone levels in the two cohorts. Thyroid hormone reference ranges were established for every 5 weeks of gestation. Differences between cohorts were explored through mixed-model repeated measures regression analyses. By applying reference ranges from one cohort to the other, the proportion of women who would be misclassified by doing so was investigated.RESULTS: TSH increased and free thyroxine (FT4) decreased as pregnancy progressed. Results indicated highly significant differences between cohorts in free triiodothyronine (F=21.3, P<0.001) and FT4 (F=941, P<0.001). TSH levels were comparable (P=0.09). Up to 90.3% of the women had FT4 levels outside their laboratory's nonpregnant reference range, and up to 100% outside the other cohort's gestational-age-specific reference ranges. Z-score-based reference ranges markedly improved comparison between cohorts.CONCLUSION: Even in the same region, the use of gestational-age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories led to misclassification. Up to 100% of maternal FT4 levels fell outside the other cohort's reference range despite similar TSH levels. In clinical practice, thyroid testing of pregnant women without adding method specificity to gestational age-dependent reference ranges will compromise patient safety.

KW - Adult

KW - Diagnostic Errors

KW - Female

KW - Fluoroimmunoassay

KW - Gestational Age

KW - Humans

KW - Longitudinal Studies

KW - Luminescent Measurements

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Reference Values

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Thyroid Diseases

KW - Thyroid Function Tests

KW - Thyroid Gland

KW - Thyrotropin

KW - Thyroxine

KW - Triiodothyronine

U2 - 10.1530/EJE-13-0672

DO - 10.1530/EJE-13-0672

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24277773

VL - 170

SP - 329

EP - 339

JO - European Journal of Endocrinology

JF - European Journal of Endocrinology

SN - 0804-4643

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 120842300