Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Function, information, and contributions : An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. / Rosell, Linn; Wihl, Jessica; Hagberg, Oskar; Ohlsson, Björn; Nilbert, Mef.

I: Rare Tumors, Bind 11, 2036361319841696, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rosell, L, Wihl, J, Hagberg, O, Ohlsson, B & Nilbert, M 2019, 'Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers', Rare Tumors, bind 11, 2036361319841696. https://doi.org/10.1177/2036361319841696

APA

Rosell, L., Wihl, J., Hagberg, O., Ohlsson, B., & Nilbert, M. (2019). Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Rare Tumors, 11, [2036361319841696]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2036361319841696

Vancouver

Rosell L, Wihl J, Hagberg O, Ohlsson B, Nilbert M. Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Rare Tumors. 2019;11. 2036361319841696. https://doi.org/10.1177/2036361319841696

Author

Rosell, Linn ; Wihl, Jessica ; Hagberg, Oskar ; Ohlsson, Björn ; Nilbert, Mef. / Function, information, and contributions : An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. I: Rare Tumors. 2019 ; Bind 11.

Bibtex

@article{cf4bfc2c863e40fb81a471aab0485bd5,
title = "Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers",
abstract = "National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings have been established in Swedish cancer care in response to centralized treatment of rare cancers. Though national meetings grant access to a large multidisciplinary network, we hypothesized that video-based meetings may challenge participants' contributions to the case discussions. We investigated participants' views and used observational tools to assess contributions from various health professionals during the multidisciplinary team meetings. Data on participants' views were collected using an electronic survey distributed to participants in six national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Data from observations were obtained from the multidisciplinary team meetings for penile cancer, anal cancer, and vulvar cancer using the standardized observational tools Meeting Observational Tool and Metric of Decision-Making that assess multidisciplinary team meeting functionality and participants' contributions to the case discussions. Participants overall rated the multidisciplinary team meetings favorably with high scores for development of individual competence and team competence. Lower scores applied to multidisciplinary team meeting technology, principles for communicating treatment recommendations, and guidelines for evaluating the meetings. Observational assessment resulted in high scores for case histories, leadership, and teamwork, whereas patient-centered care and involvement of care professionals received low scores. National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings are feasible and receive positive ratings by the participants. Case discussions cover medical perspectives well, whereas patient-centered aspects achieve less attention. Based on these findings, we discuss factors to consider to further improve treatment recommendations from national multidisciplinary team meetings.",
author = "Linn Rosell and Jessica Wihl and Oskar Hagberg and Bj{\"o}rn Ohlsson and Mef Nilbert",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/2036361319841696",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Rare Tumors",
issn = "2036-3605",
publisher = "Pagepress",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Function, information, and contributions

T2 - An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers

AU - Rosell, Linn

AU - Wihl, Jessica

AU - Hagberg, Oskar

AU - Ohlsson, Björn

AU - Nilbert, Mef

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings have been established in Swedish cancer care in response to centralized treatment of rare cancers. Though national meetings grant access to a large multidisciplinary network, we hypothesized that video-based meetings may challenge participants' contributions to the case discussions. We investigated participants' views and used observational tools to assess contributions from various health professionals during the multidisciplinary team meetings. Data on participants' views were collected using an electronic survey distributed to participants in six national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Data from observations were obtained from the multidisciplinary team meetings for penile cancer, anal cancer, and vulvar cancer using the standardized observational tools Meeting Observational Tool and Metric of Decision-Making that assess multidisciplinary team meeting functionality and participants' contributions to the case discussions. Participants overall rated the multidisciplinary team meetings favorably with high scores for development of individual competence and team competence. Lower scores applied to multidisciplinary team meeting technology, principles for communicating treatment recommendations, and guidelines for evaluating the meetings. Observational assessment resulted in high scores for case histories, leadership, and teamwork, whereas patient-centered care and involvement of care professionals received low scores. National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings are feasible and receive positive ratings by the participants. Case discussions cover medical perspectives well, whereas patient-centered aspects achieve less attention. Based on these findings, we discuss factors to consider to further improve treatment recommendations from national multidisciplinary team meetings.

AB - National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings have been established in Swedish cancer care in response to centralized treatment of rare cancers. Though national meetings grant access to a large multidisciplinary network, we hypothesized that video-based meetings may challenge participants' contributions to the case discussions. We investigated participants' views and used observational tools to assess contributions from various health professionals during the multidisciplinary team meetings. Data on participants' views were collected using an electronic survey distributed to participants in six national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Data from observations were obtained from the multidisciplinary team meetings for penile cancer, anal cancer, and vulvar cancer using the standardized observational tools Meeting Observational Tool and Metric of Decision-Making that assess multidisciplinary team meeting functionality and participants' contributions to the case discussions. Participants overall rated the multidisciplinary team meetings favorably with high scores for development of individual competence and team competence. Lower scores applied to multidisciplinary team meeting technology, principles for communicating treatment recommendations, and guidelines for evaluating the meetings. Observational assessment resulted in high scores for case histories, leadership, and teamwork, whereas patient-centered care and involvement of care professionals received low scores. National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings are feasible and receive positive ratings by the participants. Case discussions cover medical perspectives well, whereas patient-centered aspects achieve less attention. Based on these findings, we discuss factors to consider to further improve treatment recommendations from national multidisciplinary team meetings.

U2 - 10.1177/2036361319841696

DO - 10.1177/2036361319841696

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31105919

VL - 11

JO - Rare Tumors

JF - Rare Tumors

SN - 2036-3605

M1 - 2036361319841696

ER -

ID: 224600706