Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems : A Randomized Clinical Trial. / Jeppesen, Pia; Wolf, Rasmus Trap; Nielsen, Sabrina M.; Christensen, Robin; Plessen, Kerstin Jessica; Bilenberg, Niels; Thomsen, Per Hove; Thastum, Mikael; Neumer, Simon Peter; Puggaard, Louise Berg; Agner Pedersen, Mette Maria; Pagsberg, Anne Katrine; Silverman, Wendy K.; Correll, Christoph U.

I: JAMA Psychiatry, Bind 78, Nr. 3, 2021, s. 250-260.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jeppesen, P, Wolf, RT, Nielsen, SM, Christensen, R, Plessen, KJ, Bilenberg, N, Thomsen, PH, Thastum, M, Neumer, SP, Puggaard, LB, Agner Pedersen, MM, Pagsberg, AK, Silverman, WK & Correll, CU 2021, 'Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial', JAMA Psychiatry, bind 78, nr. 3, s. 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045

APA

Jeppesen, P., Wolf, R. T., Nielsen, S. M., Christensen, R., Plessen, K. J., Bilenberg, N., Thomsen, P. H., Thastum, M., Neumer, S. P., Puggaard, L. B., Agner Pedersen, M. M., Pagsberg, A. K., Silverman, W. K., & Correll, C. U. (2021). Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045

Vancouver

Jeppesen P, Wolf RT, Nielsen SM, Christensen R, Plessen KJ, Bilenberg N o.a. Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(3):250-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045

Author

Jeppesen, Pia ; Wolf, Rasmus Trap ; Nielsen, Sabrina M. ; Christensen, Robin ; Plessen, Kerstin Jessica ; Bilenberg, Niels ; Thomsen, Per Hove ; Thastum, Mikael ; Neumer, Simon Peter ; Puggaard, Louise Berg ; Agner Pedersen, Mette Maria ; Pagsberg, Anne Katrine ; Silverman, Wendy K. ; Correll, Christoph U. / Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems : A Randomized Clinical Trial. I: JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 ; Bind 78, Nr. 3. s. 250-260.

Bibtex

@article{20a3c0cbbfe544049c9c81223777c456,
title = "Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial",
abstract = "Importance: Behavioral therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs targeting a single class of problems have not been widely implemented. The population of youths with common mental health problems is markedly undertreated. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a new transdiagnostic CBT program (Mind My Mind [MMM]) compared with management as usual (MAU) in youths with emotional and behavioral problems below the threshold for referral to mental health care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic, multisite, randomized clinical trial of MMM vs MAU was conducted from September 7, 2017, to August 28, 2019, including 8 weeks of postintervention follow-up, in 4 municipalities in Denmark. Consecutive help-seeking youths were randomized (1:1) to the MMM or the MAU group. Main inclusion criteria were age 6 to 16 years and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral disturbances as a primary problem. Data were analyzed from August 12 to October 25, 2019. Interventions: The MMM intervention consisted of 9 to 13 weekly, individually adapted sessions of manualized CBT delivered by local psychologists. The MAU group received 2 care coordination visits to enhance usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in mental health problems reported by parents at week 18, using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Impact scale (range, 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater severity of distress and impairment). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-To-Treat population at week 18. Maintenance effects were assessed at week 26. Results: A total of 396 youths (mean [SD] age, 10.3 [2.4] years; 206 [52.0%] boys) were randomized to MMM (n = 197) or MAU (n = 199), with primary outcome data available in 177 (89.8%) and 167 (83.9%), respectively, at 18 weeks. The SDQ Impact score decreased by 2.34 points with MMM and 1.23 with MAU, from initial scores of 4.12 and 4.21, respectively (between-group difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.45]; P <.001; Cohen d = 0.60). Number of responders (≥1-point reduction in SDQ Impact score) was greater with MMM than with MAU (144 of 197 [73.1%] vs 93 of 199 [46.7%]; number needed to treat, 4 [95% CI, 3-6]). Secondary outcomes indicated statistically significant benefits in parent-reported changes of anxiety, depressive symptoms, daily functioning, school attendance, and the principal problem. All benefits were maintained at week 26 except for school attendance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the scalable transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention MMM outperformed MAU in a community setting on multiple, clinically relevant domains in youth with emotional and behavioral problems. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03535805.",
author = "Pia Jeppesen and Wolf, {Rasmus Trap} and Nielsen, {Sabrina M.} and Robin Christensen and Plessen, {Kerstin Jessica} and Niels Bilenberg and Thomsen, {Per Hove} and Mikael Thastum and Neumer, {Simon Peter} and Puggaard, {Louise Berg} and {Agner Pedersen}, {Mette Maria} and Pagsberg, {Anne Katrine} and Silverman, {Wendy K.} and Correll, {Christoph U.}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "250--260",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "The JAMA Network",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared with Management as Usual for Youth with Common Mental Health Problems

T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial

AU - Jeppesen, Pia

AU - Wolf, Rasmus Trap

AU - Nielsen, Sabrina M.

AU - Christensen, Robin

AU - Plessen, Kerstin Jessica

AU - Bilenberg, Niels

AU - Thomsen, Per Hove

AU - Thastum, Mikael

AU - Neumer, Simon Peter

AU - Puggaard, Louise Berg

AU - Agner Pedersen, Mette Maria

AU - Pagsberg, Anne Katrine

AU - Silverman, Wendy K.

AU - Correll, Christoph U.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Importance: Behavioral therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs targeting a single class of problems have not been widely implemented. The population of youths with common mental health problems is markedly undertreated. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a new transdiagnostic CBT program (Mind My Mind [MMM]) compared with management as usual (MAU) in youths with emotional and behavioral problems below the threshold for referral to mental health care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic, multisite, randomized clinical trial of MMM vs MAU was conducted from September 7, 2017, to August 28, 2019, including 8 weeks of postintervention follow-up, in 4 municipalities in Denmark. Consecutive help-seeking youths were randomized (1:1) to the MMM or the MAU group. Main inclusion criteria were age 6 to 16 years and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral disturbances as a primary problem. Data were analyzed from August 12 to October 25, 2019. Interventions: The MMM intervention consisted of 9 to 13 weekly, individually adapted sessions of manualized CBT delivered by local psychologists. The MAU group received 2 care coordination visits to enhance usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in mental health problems reported by parents at week 18, using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Impact scale (range, 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater severity of distress and impairment). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-To-Treat population at week 18. Maintenance effects were assessed at week 26. Results: A total of 396 youths (mean [SD] age, 10.3 [2.4] years; 206 [52.0%] boys) were randomized to MMM (n = 197) or MAU (n = 199), with primary outcome data available in 177 (89.8%) and 167 (83.9%), respectively, at 18 weeks. The SDQ Impact score decreased by 2.34 points with MMM and 1.23 with MAU, from initial scores of 4.12 and 4.21, respectively (between-group difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.45]; P <.001; Cohen d = 0.60). Number of responders (≥1-point reduction in SDQ Impact score) was greater with MMM than with MAU (144 of 197 [73.1%] vs 93 of 199 [46.7%]; number needed to treat, 4 [95% CI, 3-6]). Secondary outcomes indicated statistically significant benefits in parent-reported changes of anxiety, depressive symptoms, daily functioning, school attendance, and the principal problem. All benefits were maintained at week 26 except for school attendance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the scalable transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention MMM outperformed MAU in a community setting on multiple, clinically relevant domains in youth with emotional and behavioral problems. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03535805.

AB - Importance: Behavioral therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs targeting a single class of problems have not been widely implemented. The population of youths with common mental health problems is markedly undertreated. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a new transdiagnostic CBT program (Mind My Mind [MMM]) compared with management as usual (MAU) in youths with emotional and behavioral problems below the threshold for referral to mental health care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic, multisite, randomized clinical trial of MMM vs MAU was conducted from September 7, 2017, to August 28, 2019, including 8 weeks of postintervention follow-up, in 4 municipalities in Denmark. Consecutive help-seeking youths were randomized (1:1) to the MMM or the MAU group. Main inclusion criteria were age 6 to 16 years and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral disturbances as a primary problem. Data were analyzed from August 12 to October 25, 2019. Interventions: The MMM intervention consisted of 9 to 13 weekly, individually adapted sessions of manualized CBT delivered by local psychologists. The MAU group received 2 care coordination visits to enhance usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in mental health problems reported by parents at week 18, using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Impact scale (range, 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater severity of distress and impairment). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-To-Treat population at week 18. Maintenance effects were assessed at week 26. Results: A total of 396 youths (mean [SD] age, 10.3 [2.4] years; 206 [52.0%] boys) were randomized to MMM (n = 197) or MAU (n = 199), with primary outcome data available in 177 (89.8%) and 167 (83.9%), respectively, at 18 weeks. The SDQ Impact score decreased by 2.34 points with MMM and 1.23 with MAU, from initial scores of 4.12 and 4.21, respectively (between-group difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.45]; P <.001; Cohen d = 0.60). Number of responders (≥1-point reduction in SDQ Impact score) was greater with MMM than with MAU (144 of 197 [73.1%] vs 93 of 199 [46.7%]; number needed to treat, 4 [95% CI, 3-6]). Secondary outcomes indicated statistically significant benefits in parent-reported changes of anxiety, depressive symptoms, daily functioning, school attendance, and the principal problem. All benefits were maintained at week 26 except for school attendance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the scalable transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention MMM outperformed MAU in a community setting on multiple, clinically relevant domains in youth with emotional and behavioral problems. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03535805.

U2 - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045

DO - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33355633

AN - SCOPUS:85098328562

VL - 78

SP - 250

EP - 260

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 255504412