Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures : a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. / Liaghat, Behnam; Brorson, Stig.

I: BMJ Open, Bind 12, Nr. 10, 2022, s. e064156.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Liaghat, B & Brorson, S 2022, 'Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial', BMJ Open, bind 12, nr. 10, s. e064156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064156

APA

Liaghat, B., & Brorson, S. (2022). Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open, 12(10), e064156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064156

Vancouver

Liaghat B, Brorson S. Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e064156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064156

Author

Liaghat, Behnam ; Brorson, Stig. / Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures : a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. I: BMJ Open. 2022 ; Bind 12, Nr. 10. s. e064156.

Bibtex

@article{2e3f196cfc3b48ac87c5cabcf9e826cb,
title = "Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are being offered non-surgical treatment, including short immobilisation and structured rehabilitation. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing structured rehabilitation with non-structured rehabilitation to investigate the benefits of structured rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this RCT, patients with a displaced PHF will be assessed for eligibility at a Danish university outpatient clinic. Patients with competing injuries or patients offered surgery will be excluded, and randomisation will be 1:1. All patients will receive standard orthopaedic follow-up, including 14-day postinjury immobilisation, and advice about returning to activities of daily living before being allocated to structured rehabilitation in the municipalities or non-structured rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score (0-48 points, 48=best, minimal clinically important difference=10) at 6 months. A sample size of 60 patients will allow us to show a 10-point difference with 80% power. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Funded by Department of Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital (grant number N/A) and Region Zealand Health Science Research Foundation (R32-A1108-B14), 14 January 2022; The Ethics committee in Region Zealand approved (EMN-2022-02449), 8 April 2022. The site opened on 5 May 2022, and the final results will be updated on trial registries, submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and inform rehabilitation strategies after displaced PHFs. Protocol version 1, 21 April 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05302089.",
keywords = "clinical trials, rehabilitation medicine, shoulder",
author = "Behnam Liaghat and Stig Brorson",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064156",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "e064156",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures

T2 - a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

AU - Liaghat, Behnam

AU - Brorson, Stig

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are being offered non-surgical treatment, including short immobilisation and structured rehabilitation. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing structured rehabilitation with non-structured rehabilitation to investigate the benefits of structured rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this RCT, patients with a displaced PHF will be assessed for eligibility at a Danish university outpatient clinic. Patients with competing injuries or patients offered surgery will be excluded, and randomisation will be 1:1. All patients will receive standard orthopaedic follow-up, including 14-day postinjury immobilisation, and advice about returning to activities of daily living before being allocated to structured rehabilitation in the municipalities or non-structured rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score (0-48 points, 48=best, minimal clinically important difference=10) at 6 months. A sample size of 60 patients will allow us to show a 10-point difference with 80% power. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Funded by Department of Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital (grant number N/A) and Region Zealand Health Science Research Foundation (R32-A1108-B14), 14 January 2022; The Ethics committee in Region Zealand approved (EMN-2022-02449), 8 April 2022. The site opened on 5 May 2022, and the final results will be updated on trial registries, submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and inform rehabilitation strategies after displaced PHFs. Protocol version 1, 21 April 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05302089.

AB - INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are being offered non-surgical treatment, including short immobilisation and structured rehabilitation. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing structured rehabilitation with non-structured rehabilitation to investigate the benefits of structured rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this RCT, patients with a displaced PHF will be assessed for eligibility at a Danish university outpatient clinic. Patients with competing injuries or patients offered surgery will be excluded, and randomisation will be 1:1. All patients will receive standard orthopaedic follow-up, including 14-day postinjury immobilisation, and advice about returning to activities of daily living before being allocated to structured rehabilitation in the municipalities or non-structured rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score (0-48 points, 48=best, minimal clinically important difference=10) at 6 months. A sample size of 60 patients will allow us to show a 10-point difference with 80% power. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Funded by Department of Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital (grant number N/A) and Region Zealand Health Science Research Foundation (R32-A1108-B14), 14 January 2022; The Ethics committee in Region Zealand approved (EMN-2022-02449), 8 April 2022. The site opened on 5 May 2022, and the final results will be updated on trial registries, submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and inform rehabilitation strategies after displaced PHFs. Protocol version 1, 21 April 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05302089.

KW - clinical trials

KW - rehabilitation medicine

KW - shoulder

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064156

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064156

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36253041

AN - SCOPUS:85140271148

VL - 12

SP - e064156

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 324000530