Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention: Is There a Rationale?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention : Is There a Rationale? / Pellesi, Lanfranco; Do, Thien P.; Ashina, Håkan; Ashina, Messoud; Burstein, Rami.

I: Headache, Bind 60, Nr. 6, 2020, s. 1056-1065.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pellesi, L, Do, TP, Ashina, H, Ashina, M & Burstein, R 2020, 'Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention: Is There a Rationale?', Headache, bind 60, nr. 6, s. 1056-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13843

APA

Pellesi, L., Do, T. P., Ashina, H., Ashina, M., & Burstein, R. (2020). Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention: Is There a Rationale? Headache, 60(6), 1056-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13843

Vancouver

Pellesi L, Do TP, Ashina H, Ashina M, Burstein R. Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention: Is There a Rationale? Headache. 2020;60(6):1056-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13843

Author

Pellesi, Lanfranco ; Do, Thien P. ; Ashina, Håkan ; Ashina, Messoud ; Burstein, Rami. / Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention : Is There a Rationale?. I: Headache. 2020 ; Bind 60, Nr. 6. s. 1056-1065.

Bibtex

@article{9058d647672d4dd68d13f55611122c9e,
title = "Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention: Is There a Rationale?",
abstract = "Objective: To narratively review the pathophysiological rationale of dual therapy with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A in treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. Background: For the prevention of chronic migraine, several pharmacological therapies are available, including oral medications, botulinum toxin type A, and the newly approved monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. However, monotherapy does not yield benefits in some affected individuals, which raises the question of whether dual therapy with monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A hold promise in patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Method: We searched MEDLINE for articles published from database inception to December 31st, 2019. Publications were largely selected from the past 10 years but commonly referenced and highly regarded older publications were not excluded. Results: Preclinical data suggest that anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A have synergistic effects within the trigeminovascular system. Of note, findings indicate that fremanezumab – an antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide – mainly prevents the activation of Aδ-fibers, whereas botulinum toxin type A prevents the activation of C-fibers. Conclusion: There is currently only indirect preclinical evidence to support a rationale for dual therapy with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A for chronic migraine prevention. Rigorous studies evaluating clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are needed.",
keywords = "antagonism, combined therapy, headache, neurotransmission, pain, pathophysiology",
author = "Lanfranco Pellesi and Do, {Thien P.} and H{\aa}kan Ashina and Messoud Ashina and Rami Burstein",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/head.13843",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "1056--1065",
journal = "Headache",
issn = "0017-8748",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual Therapy With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and Botulinum Toxin for Migraine Prevention

T2 - Is There a Rationale?

AU - Pellesi, Lanfranco

AU - Do, Thien P.

AU - Ashina, Håkan

AU - Ashina, Messoud

AU - Burstein, Rami

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objective: To narratively review the pathophysiological rationale of dual therapy with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A in treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. Background: For the prevention of chronic migraine, several pharmacological therapies are available, including oral medications, botulinum toxin type A, and the newly approved monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. However, monotherapy does not yield benefits in some affected individuals, which raises the question of whether dual therapy with monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A hold promise in patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Method: We searched MEDLINE for articles published from database inception to December 31st, 2019. Publications were largely selected from the past 10 years but commonly referenced and highly regarded older publications were not excluded. Results: Preclinical data suggest that anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A have synergistic effects within the trigeminovascular system. Of note, findings indicate that fremanezumab – an antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide – mainly prevents the activation of Aδ-fibers, whereas botulinum toxin type A prevents the activation of C-fibers. Conclusion: There is currently only indirect preclinical evidence to support a rationale for dual therapy with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A for chronic migraine prevention. Rigorous studies evaluating clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are needed.

AB - Objective: To narratively review the pathophysiological rationale of dual therapy with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A in treatment-resistant chronic migraine prevention. Background: For the prevention of chronic migraine, several pharmacological therapies are available, including oral medications, botulinum toxin type A, and the newly approved monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. However, monotherapy does not yield benefits in some affected individuals, which raises the question of whether dual therapy with monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A hold promise in patients with treatment-resistant chronic migraine. Method: We searched MEDLINE for articles published from database inception to December 31st, 2019. Publications were largely selected from the past 10 years but commonly referenced and highly regarded older publications were not excluded. Results: Preclinical data suggest that anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A have synergistic effects within the trigeminovascular system. Of note, findings indicate that fremanezumab – an antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide – mainly prevents the activation of Aδ-fibers, whereas botulinum toxin type A prevents the activation of C-fibers. Conclusion: There is currently only indirect preclinical evidence to support a rationale for dual therapy with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin type A for chronic migraine prevention. Rigorous studies evaluating clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are needed.

KW - antagonism

KW - combined therapy

KW - headache

KW - neurotransmission

KW - pain

KW - pathophysiology

U2 - 10.1111/head.13843

DO - 10.1111/head.13843

M3 - Review

C2 - 32437038

AN - SCOPUS:85085052085

VL - 60

SP - 1056

EP - 1065

JO - Headache

JF - Headache

SN - 0017-8748

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 254463682