Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Drug provocation testing : risk stratification is key. / Garvey, Lene H; Savic, Louise C.

I: Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Bind 19, Nr. 4, 08.2019, s. 266-271.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Garvey, LH & Savic, LC 2019, 'Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key', Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, bind 19, nr. 4, s. 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000543

APA

Garvey, L. H., & Savic, L. C. (2019). Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 19(4), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000543

Vancouver

Garvey LH, Savic LC. Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019 aug.;19(4):266-271. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000543

Author

Garvey, Lene H ; Savic, Louise C. / Drug provocation testing : risk stratification is key. I: Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019 ; Bind 19, Nr. 4. s. 266-271.

Bibtex

@article{8af7562507e44425a8c4e5e925ae3856,
title = "Drug provocation testing: risk stratification is key",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe current best practice and recent advances in the use of risk stratification as a tool for drug provocation testing (DPT). In particular, we focus on the testing of unsubstantiated penicillin allergy labels.RECENT FINDINGS: The inherent risks of DPT are mitigated through careful selection of patients. A detailed history will elicit features of a potentially severe index reaction, as well as significant patient comorbidities which may increase the risks associated with DPT. Such patients require skin testing and/or in vitro testing prior to consideration for a DPT. However, there is increasing evidence that patients without these features may be able to proceed directly to DPT. This has been demonstrated extensively with unsubstantiated penicillin allergy labels, and a variety of risk stratification models have been employed to identify the 'low-risk' patient. Improved outcomes and reduced cost have been demonstrated with such models without compromising patient safety.SUMMARY: Risk stratification tools may enable well-tolerated and effective 'delabelling' of low-risk patients, with less demand on already scarce resources.",
author = "Garvey, {Lene H} and Savic, {Louise C}",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1097/ACI.0000000000000543",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "266--271",
journal = "Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "1528-4050",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug provocation testing

T2 - risk stratification is key

AU - Garvey, Lene H

AU - Savic, Louise C

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe current best practice and recent advances in the use of risk stratification as a tool for drug provocation testing (DPT). In particular, we focus on the testing of unsubstantiated penicillin allergy labels.RECENT FINDINGS: The inherent risks of DPT are mitigated through careful selection of patients. A detailed history will elicit features of a potentially severe index reaction, as well as significant patient comorbidities which may increase the risks associated with DPT. Such patients require skin testing and/or in vitro testing prior to consideration for a DPT. However, there is increasing evidence that patients without these features may be able to proceed directly to DPT. This has been demonstrated extensively with unsubstantiated penicillin allergy labels, and a variety of risk stratification models have been employed to identify the 'low-risk' patient. Improved outcomes and reduced cost have been demonstrated with such models without compromising patient safety.SUMMARY: Risk stratification tools may enable well-tolerated and effective 'delabelling' of low-risk patients, with less demand on already scarce resources.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe current best practice and recent advances in the use of risk stratification as a tool for drug provocation testing (DPT). In particular, we focus on the testing of unsubstantiated penicillin allergy labels.RECENT FINDINGS: The inherent risks of DPT are mitigated through careful selection of patients. A detailed history will elicit features of a potentially severe index reaction, as well as significant patient comorbidities which may increase the risks associated with DPT. Such patients require skin testing and/or in vitro testing prior to consideration for a DPT. However, there is increasing evidence that patients without these features may be able to proceed directly to DPT. This has been demonstrated extensively with unsubstantiated penicillin allergy labels, and a variety of risk stratification models have been employed to identify the 'low-risk' patient. Improved outcomes and reduced cost have been demonstrated with such models without compromising patient safety.SUMMARY: Risk stratification tools may enable well-tolerated and effective 'delabelling' of low-risk patients, with less demand on already scarce resources.

U2 - 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000543

DO - 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000543

M3 - Review

C2 - 31247633

VL - 19

SP - 266

EP - 271

JO - Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 1528-4050

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 233725046