Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course: Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course : Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up. / Ross, Lone; Rottmann, Nina; Andersen, Klaus K; Terp, Mette H; Johansen, Christoffer; Dalton, Susanne O.

I: Acta Oncologica, Bind 54, Nr. 5, 2015, s. 735-42.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ross, L, Rottmann, N, Andersen, KK, Terp, MH, Johansen, C & Dalton, SO 2015, 'Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course: Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up', Acta Oncologica, bind 54, nr. 5, s. 735-42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.998278

APA

Ross, L., Rottmann, N., Andersen, K. K., Terp, M. H., Johansen, C., & Dalton, S. O. (2015). Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course: Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up. Acta Oncologica, 54(5), 735-42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.998278

Vancouver

Ross L, Rottmann N, Andersen KK, Terp MH, Johansen C, Dalton SO. Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course: Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up. Acta Oncologica. 2015;54(5):735-42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.998278

Author

Ross, Lone ; Rottmann, Nina ; Andersen, Klaus K ; Terp, Mette H ; Johansen, Christoffer ; Dalton, Susanne O. / Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course : Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up. I: Acta Oncologica. 2015 ; Bind 54, Nr. 5. s. 735-42.

Bibtex

@article{f5656b7420644de4bed3a2f567db4fc3,
title = "Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course: Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Danish Cancer Society opened a rehabilitation centre in which cancer patients were offered a free, six-day, multidimensional residential course. Our previous studies of the effects of this course at one and six months of follow-up showed no positive effect on distress. We investigated long-term effects at 12 months of follow-up and whether subgroups with fewer psychosocial resources received more benefit from the intervention than patients with better resources.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In two Danish counties, 507 patients with breast, prostate, colon or rectum cancer diagnosed within the past two years who had completed primary treatment were randomised to a six-day, multidimensional residential rehabilitation course or to standard care. Of these, 208 patients received the allocated intervention and 244 received the allocated control condition and were included in the analyses. Patients in both groups completed questionnaires at baseline and at one, six and 12 months of follow-up, including the 'Profile of Mood States short form', the 'General Self-efficacy' scale and a question on emotional support. At 12 months of follow-up, 179 participants in the intervention group and 195 in the control group provided data.RESULTS: No effect of the intervention was found on distress at 12 months of follow-up, even in subgroups with fewer psychosocial resources at baseline, i.e. greater baseline distress, poorer self-efficacy and less emotional support.CONCLUSION: Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes may not be effective in the treatment of distress. During the past few decades, studies of psychotherapy or psycho-education in cancer patients have shown small to moderate effects. More focused rehabilitation programmes may be more effective.",
keywords = "Adult, Affect, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Rectal Neoplasms, Self Efficacy, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors, Time Factors",
author = "Lone Ross and Nina Rottmann and Andersen, {Klaus K} and Terp, {Mette H} and Christoffer Johansen and Dalton, {Susanne O}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3109/0284186X.2014.998278",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "735--42",
journal = "Acta Oncologica",
issn = "1100-1704",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distress after a psychosocial cancer rehabilitation course

T2 - Main effects and effect modification in a randomised trial at 12 months of follow-up

AU - Ross, Lone

AU - Rottmann, Nina

AU - Andersen, Klaus K

AU - Terp, Mette H

AU - Johansen, Christoffer

AU - Dalton, Susanne O

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Danish Cancer Society opened a rehabilitation centre in which cancer patients were offered a free, six-day, multidimensional residential course. Our previous studies of the effects of this course at one and six months of follow-up showed no positive effect on distress. We investigated long-term effects at 12 months of follow-up and whether subgroups with fewer psychosocial resources received more benefit from the intervention than patients with better resources.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In two Danish counties, 507 patients with breast, prostate, colon or rectum cancer diagnosed within the past two years who had completed primary treatment were randomised to a six-day, multidimensional residential rehabilitation course or to standard care. Of these, 208 patients received the allocated intervention and 244 received the allocated control condition and were included in the analyses. Patients in both groups completed questionnaires at baseline and at one, six and 12 months of follow-up, including the 'Profile of Mood States short form', the 'General Self-efficacy' scale and a question on emotional support. At 12 months of follow-up, 179 participants in the intervention group and 195 in the control group provided data.RESULTS: No effect of the intervention was found on distress at 12 months of follow-up, even in subgroups with fewer psychosocial resources at baseline, i.e. greater baseline distress, poorer self-efficacy and less emotional support.CONCLUSION: Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes may not be effective in the treatment of distress. During the past few decades, studies of psychotherapy or psycho-education in cancer patients have shown small to moderate effects. More focused rehabilitation programmes may be more effective.

AB - BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Danish Cancer Society opened a rehabilitation centre in which cancer patients were offered a free, six-day, multidimensional residential course. Our previous studies of the effects of this course at one and six months of follow-up showed no positive effect on distress. We investigated long-term effects at 12 months of follow-up and whether subgroups with fewer psychosocial resources received more benefit from the intervention than patients with better resources.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In two Danish counties, 507 patients with breast, prostate, colon or rectum cancer diagnosed within the past two years who had completed primary treatment were randomised to a six-day, multidimensional residential rehabilitation course or to standard care. Of these, 208 patients received the allocated intervention and 244 received the allocated control condition and were included in the analyses. Patients in both groups completed questionnaires at baseline and at one, six and 12 months of follow-up, including the 'Profile of Mood States short form', the 'General Self-efficacy' scale and a question on emotional support. At 12 months of follow-up, 179 participants in the intervention group and 195 in the control group provided data.RESULTS: No effect of the intervention was found on distress at 12 months of follow-up, even in subgroups with fewer psychosocial resources at baseline, i.e. greater baseline distress, poorer self-efficacy and less emotional support.CONCLUSION: Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes may not be effective in the treatment of distress. During the past few decades, studies of psychotherapy or psycho-education in cancer patients have shown small to moderate effects. More focused rehabilitation programmes may be more effective.

KW - Adult

KW - Affect

KW - Aged

KW - Breast Neoplasms

KW - Colonic Neoplasms

KW - Denmark

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Rectal Neoplasms

KW - Self Efficacy

KW - Social Support

KW - Stress, Psychological

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Survivors

KW - Time Factors

U2 - 10.3109/0284186X.2014.998278

DO - 10.3109/0284186X.2014.998278

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25752969

VL - 54

SP - 735

EP - 742

JO - Acta Oncologica

JF - Acta Oncologica

SN - 1100-1704

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 162693701