Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. / Rothenburger, Tamara; Thomas, Dominique; Schreiber, Yannick; Wratil, Paul R.; Pflantz, Tamara; Knecht, Kirsten; Digianantonio, Katie; Temple, Joshua; Schneider, Constanze; Baldauf, Hanna Mari; McLaughlin, Katie May; Rothweiler, Florian; Bilen, Berna; Farmand, Samira; Bojkova, Denisa; Costa, Rui; Ferreirós, Nerea; Geisslinger, Gerd; Oellerich, Thomas; Xiong, Yong; Keppler, Oliver T.; Wass, Mark N.; Michaelis, Martin; Cinatl, Jindrich.

I: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, Bind 40, Nr. 1, 317, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rothenburger, T, Thomas, D, Schreiber, Y, Wratil, PR, Pflantz, T, Knecht, K, Digianantonio, K, Temple, J, Schneider, C, Baldauf, HM, McLaughlin, KM, Rothweiler, F, Bilen, B, Farmand, S, Bojkova, D, Costa, R, Ferreirós, N, Geisslinger, G, Oellerich, T, Xiong, Y, Keppler, OT, Wass, MN, Michaelis, M & Cinatl, J 2021, 'Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells', Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, bind 40, nr. 1, 317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02093-4

APA

Rothenburger, T., Thomas, D., Schreiber, Y., Wratil, P. R., Pflantz, T., Knecht, K., Digianantonio, K., Temple, J., Schneider, C., Baldauf, H. M., McLaughlin, K. M., Rothweiler, F., Bilen, B., Farmand, S., Bojkova, D., Costa, R., Ferreirós, N., Geisslinger, G., Oellerich, T., ... Cinatl, J. (2021). Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, 40(1), [317]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02093-4

Vancouver

Rothenburger T, Thomas D, Schreiber Y, Wratil PR, Pflantz T, Knecht K o.a. Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research. 2021;40(1). 317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02093-4

Author

Rothenburger, Tamara ; Thomas, Dominique ; Schreiber, Yannick ; Wratil, Paul R. ; Pflantz, Tamara ; Knecht, Kirsten ; Digianantonio, Katie ; Temple, Joshua ; Schneider, Constanze ; Baldauf, Hanna Mari ; McLaughlin, Katie May ; Rothweiler, Florian ; Bilen, Berna ; Farmand, Samira ; Bojkova, Denisa ; Costa, Rui ; Ferreirós, Nerea ; Geisslinger, Gerd ; Oellerich, Thomas ; Xiong, Yong ; Keppler, Oliver T. ; Wass, Mark N. ; Michaelis, Martin ; Cinatl, Jindrich. / Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. I: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research. 2021 ; Bind 40, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{e8284a13fbf3486cab52cfafda12c7a8,
title = "Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells",
abstract = "Background: SAMHD1 mediates resistance to anti-cancer nucleoside analogues, including cytarabine, decitabine, and nelarabine that are commonly used for the treatment of leukaemia, through cleavage of their triphosphorylated forms. Hence, SAMHD1 inhibitors are promising candidates for the sensitisation of leukaemia cells to nucleoside analogue-based therapy. Here, we investigated the effects of the cytosine analogue CNDAC, which has been proposed to be a SAMHD1 inhibitor, in the context of SAMHD1. Methods: CNDAC was tested in 13 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cell lines, in 26 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cell lines, ten AML sublines adapted to various antileukaemic drugs, 24 single cell-derived clonal AML sublines, and primary leukaemic blasts from 24 AML patients. Moreover, 24 CNDAC-resistant sublines of the AML cell lines HL-60 and PL-21 were established. The SAMHD1 gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 and SAMHD1 depleted using RNAi, and the viral Vpx protein. Forced DCK expression was achieved by lentiviral transduction. SAMHD1 promoter methylation was determined by PCR after treatment of genomic DNA with the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease. Nucleoside (analogue) triphosphate levels were determined by LC-MS/MS. CNDAC interaction with SAMHD1 was analysed by an enzymatic assay and by crystallisation. Results: Although the cytosine analogue CNDAC was anticipated to inhibit SAMHD1, SAMHD1 mediated intrinsic CNDAC resistance in leukaemia cells. Accordingly, SAMHD1 depletion increased CNDAC triphosphate (CNDAC-TP) levels and CNDAC toxicity. Enzymatic assays and crystallisation studies confirmed CNDAC-TP to be a SAMHD1 substrate. In 24 CNDAC-adapted acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) sublines, resistance was driven by DCK (catalyses initial nucleoside phosphorylation) loss. CNDAC-adapted sublines displayed cross-resistance only to other DCK substrates (e.g. cytarabine, decitabine). Cell lines adapted to drugs not affected by DCK or SAMHD1 remained CNDAC sensitive. In cytarabine-adapted AML cells, increased SAMHD1 and reduced DCK levels contributed to cytarabine and CNDAC resistance. Conclusion: Intrinsic and acquired resistance to CNDAC and related nucleoside analogues are driven by different mechanisms. The lack of cross-resistance between SAMHD1/ DCK substrates and non-substrates provides scope for next-line therapies after treatment failure.",
keywords = "Acquired resistance, Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Acute myeloid leukemia, CNDAC, DCK, Intrinsic resistance, Leukemia, SAMHD1, Sapacitabine",
author = "Tamara Rothenburger and Dominique Thomas and Yannick Schreiber and Wratil, {Paul R.} and Tamara Pflantz and Kirsten Knecht and Katie Digianantonio and Joshua Temple and Constanze Schneider and Baldauf, {Hanna Mari} and McLaughlin, {Katie May} and Florian Rothweiler and Berna Bilen and Samira Farmand and Denisa Bojkova and Rui Costa and Nerea Ferreir{\'o}s and Gerd Geisslinger and Thomas Oellerich and Yong Xiong and Keppler, {Oliver T.} and Wass, {Mark N.} and Martin Michaelis and Jindrich Cinatl",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1186/s13046-021-02093-4",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
journal = "Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research (Online)",
issn = "1756-9966",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells

AU - Rothenburger, Tamara

AU - Thomas, Dominique

AU - Schreiber, Yannick

AU - Wratil, Paul R.

AU - Pflantz, Tamara

AU - Knecht, Kirsten

AU - Digianantonio, Katie

AU - Temple, Joshua

AU - Schneider, Constanze

AU - Baldauf, Hanna Mari

AU - McLaughlin, Katie May

AU - Rothweiler, Florian

AU - Bilen, Berna

AU - Farmand, Samira

AU - Bojkova, Denisa

AU - Costa, Rui

AU - Ferreirós, Nerea

AU - Geisslinger, Gerd

AU - Oellerich, Thomas

AU - Xiong, Yong

AU - Keppler, Oliver T.

AU - Wass, Mark N.

AU - Michaelis, Martin

AU - Cinatl, Jindrich

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: SAMHD1 mediates resistance to anti-cancer nucleoside analogues, including cytarabine, decitabine, and nelarabine that are commonly used for the treatment of leukaemia, through cleavage of their triphosphorylated forms. Hence, SAMHD1 inhibitors are promising candidates for the sensitisation of leukaemia cells to nucleoside analogue-based therapy. Here, we investigated the effects of the cytosine analogue CNDAC, which has been proposed to be a SAMHD1 inhibitor, in the context of SAMHD1. Methods: CNDAC was tested in 13 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cell lines, in 26 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cell lines, ten AML sublines adapted to various antileukaemic drugs, 24 single cell-derived clonal AML sublines, and primary leukaemic blasts from 24 AML patients. Moreover, 24 CNDAC-resistant sublines of the AML cell lines HL-60 and PL-21 were established. The SAMHD1 gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 and SAMHD1 depleted using RNAi, and the viral Vpx protein. Forced DCK expression was achieved by lentiviral transduction. SAMHD1 promoter methylation was determined by PCR after treatment of genomic DNA with the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease. Nucleoside (analogue) triphosphate levels were determined by LC-MS/MS. CNDAC interaction with SAMHD1 was analysed by an enzymatic assay and by crystallisation. Results: Although the cytosine analogue CNDAC was anticipated to inhibit SAMHD1, SAMHD1 mediated intrinsic CNDAC resistance in leukaemia cells. Accordingly, SAMHD1 depletion increased CNDAC triphosphate (CNDAC-TP) levels and CNDAC toxicity. Enzymatic assays and crystallisation studies confirmed CNDAC-TP to be a SAMHD1 substrate. In 24 CNDAC-adapted acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) sublines, resistance was driven by DCK (catalyses initial nucleoside phosphorylation) loss. CNDAC-adapted sublines displayed cross-resistance only to other DCK substrates (e.g. cytarabine, decitabine). Cell lines adapted to drugs not affected by DCK or SAMHD1 remained CNDAC sensitive. In cytarabine-adapted AML cells, increased SAMHD1 and reduced DCK levels contributed to cytarabine and CNDAC resistance. Conclusion: Intrinsic and acquired resistance to CNDAC and related nucleoside analogues are driven by different mechanisms. The lack of cross-resistance between SAMHD1/ DCK substrates and non-substrates provides scope for next-line therapies after treatment failure.

AB - Background: SAMHD1 mediates resistance to anti-cancer nucleoside analogues, including cytarabine, decitabine, and nelarabine that are commonly used for the treatment of leukaemia, through cleavage of their triphosphorylated forms. Hence, SAMHD1 inhibitors are promising candidates for the sensitisation of leukaemia cells to nucleoside analogue-based therapy. Here, we investigated the effects of the cytosine analogue CNDAC, which has been proposed to be a SAMHD1 inhibitor, in the context of SAMHD1. Methods: CNDAC was tested in 13 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cell lines, in 26 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cell lines, ten AML sublines adapted to various antileukaemic drugs, 24 single cell-derived clonal AML sublines, and primary leukaemic blasts from 24 AML patients. Moreover, 24 CNDAC-resistant sublines of the AML cell lines HL-60 and PL-21 were established. The SAMHD1 gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 and SAMHD1 depleted using RNAi, and the viral Vpx protein. Forced DCK expression was achieved by lentiviral transduction. SAMHD1 promoter methylation was determined by PCR after treatment of genomic DNA with the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease. Nucleoside (analogue) triphosphate levels were determined by LC-MS/MS. CNDAC interaction with SAMHD1 was analysed by an enzymatic assay and by crystallisation. Results: Although the cytosine analogue CNDAC was anticipated to inhibit SAMHD1, SAMHD1 mediated intrinsic CNDAC resistance in leukaemia cells. Accordingly, SAMHD1 depletion increased CNDAC triphosphate (CNDAC-TP) levels and CNDAC toxicity. Enzymatic assays and crystallisation studies confirmed CNDAC-TP to be a SAMHD1 substrate. In 24 CNDAC-adapted acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) sublines, resistance was driven by DCK (catalyses initial nucleoside phosphorylation) loss. CNDAC-adapted sublines displayed cross-resistance only to other DCK substrates (e.g. cytarabine, decitabine). Cell lines adapted to drugs not affected by DCK or SAMHD1 remained CNDAC sensitive. In cytarabine-adapted AML cells, increased SAMHD1 and reduced DCK levels contributed to cytarabine and CNDAC resistance. Conclusion: Intrinsic and acquired resistance to CNDAC and related nucleoside analogues are driven by different mechanisms. The lack of cross-resistance between SAMHD1/ DCK substrates and non-substrates provides scope for next-line therapies after treatment failure.

KW - Acquired resistance

KW - Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

KW - Acute myeloid leukemia

KW - CNDAC

KW - DCK

KW - Intrinsic resistance

KW - Leukemia

KW - SAMHD1

KW - Sapacitabine

U2 - 10.1186/s13046-021-02093-4

DO - 10.1186/s13046-021-02093-4

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34641952

AN - SCOPUS:85117356544

VL - 40

JO - Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research (Online)

JF - Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research (Online)

SN - 1756-9966

IS - 1

M1 - 317

ER -

ID: 299701586