Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan. / Urup, Thomas; Dahlrot, Rikke Hedegaard; Grunnet, Kirsten; Christensen, Ib Jarle; Michaelsen, Signe Regner; Toft, Anders; Larsen, Vibeke Andrée; Broholm, Helle; Kosteljanetz, Michael; Hansen, Steinbjørn; Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard; Lassen, Ulrik.

I: Acta Oncologica, Bind 55, Nr. 4, 2016, s. 418-22.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Urup, T, Dahlrot, RH, Grunnet, K, Christensen, IJ, Michaelsen, SR, Toft, A, Larsen, VA, Broholm, H, Kosteljanetz, M, Hansen, S, Poulsen, HS & Lassen, U 2016, 'Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan', Acta Oncologica, bind 55, nr. 4, s. 418-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679

APA

Urup, T., Dahlrot, R. H., Grunnet, K., Christensen, I. J., Michaelsen, S. R., Toft, A., Larsen, V. A., Broholm, H., Kosteljanetz, M., Hansen, S., Poulsen, H. S., & Lassen, U. (2016). Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan. Acta Oncologica, 55(4), 418-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679

Vancouver

Urup T, Dahlrot RH, Grunnet K, Christensen IJ, Michaelsen SR, Toft A o.a. Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan. Acta Oncologica. 2016;55(4):418-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679

Author

Urup, Thomas ; Dahlrot, Rikke Hedegaard ; Grunnet, Kirsten ; Christensen, Ib Jarle ; Michaelsen, Signe Regner ; Toft, Anders ; Larsen, Vibeke Andrée ; Broholm, Helle ; Kosteljanetz, Michael ; Hansen, Steinbjørn ; Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard ; Lassen, Ulrik. / Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan. I: Acta Oncologica. 2016 ; Bind 55, Nr. 4. s. 418-22.

Bibtex

@article{28e86bf19b4741f5809ed3e9c3285b10,
title = "Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Predictive markers and prognostic models are required in order to individualize treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Here, we sought to identify clinical factors able to predict response and survival in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 219 recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus irinotecan according to a previously published treatment protocol were included in the initial population. Prognostic models were generated by means of multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis.RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use had a negative predictive impact on response at first evaluation (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03) and at best response (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = 0.056). Three significant (p < 0.05) prognostic factors associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were identified. These factors were included in the final model for OS, namely corticosteroid use (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18-2.45; p = 0.004), neurocognitive deficit (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.89; p = 0.03) and multifocal disease (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11; p < 0.0001). Based on these results a prognostic index able to calculate the probability for OS at 6 and 12 months for the individual patient was established. The predictive value of the model for OS was validated in a separate patient cohort of 85 patients.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A prognostic model for OS was established and validated. This model can be used by physicians to risk stratify the individual patient and together with the patient decide whether to initiate BEV relapse treatment.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Thomas Urup and Dahlrot, {Rikke Hedegaard} and Kirsten Grunnet and Christensen, {Ib Jarle} and Michaelsen, {Signe Regner} and Anders Toft and Larsen, {Vibeke Andr{\'e}e} and Helle Broholm and Michael Kosteljanetz and Steinbj{\o}rn Hansen and Poulsen, {Hans Skovgaard} and Ulrik Lassen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "418--22",
journal = "Acta Oncologica",
issn = "1100-1704",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan

AU - Urup, Thomas

AU - Dahlrot, Rikke Hedegaard

AU - Grunnet, Kirsten

AU - Christensen, Ib Jarle

AU - Michaelsen, Signe Regner

AU - Toft, Anders

AU - Larsen, Vibeke Andrée

AU - Broholm, Helle

AU - Kosteljanetz, Michael

AU - Hansen, Steinbjørn

AU - Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard

AU - Lassen, Ulrik

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - BACKGROUND: Predictive markers and prognostic models are required in order to individualize treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Here, we sought to identify clinical factors able to predict response and survival in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 219 recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus irinotecan according to a previously published treatment protocol were included in the initial population. Prognostic models were generated by means of multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis.RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use had a negative predictive impact on response at first evaluation (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03) and at best response (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = 0.056). Three significant (p < 0.05) prognostic factors associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were identified. These factors were included in the final model for OS, namely corticosteroid use (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18-2.45; p = 0.004), neurocognitive deficit (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.89; p = 0.03) and multifocal disease (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11; p < 0.0001). Based on these results a prognostic index able to calculate the probability for OS at 6 and 12 months for the individual patient was established. The predictive value of the model for OS was validated in a separate patient cohort of 85 patients.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A prognostic model for OS was established and validated. This model can be used by physicians to risk stratify the individual patient and together with the patient decide whether to initiate BEV relapse treatment.

AB - BACKGROUND: Predictive markers and prognostic models are required in order to individualize treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Here, we sought to identify clinical factors able to predict response and survival in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 219 recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus irinotecan according to a previously published treatment protocol were included in the initial population. Prognostic models were generated by means of multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis.RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use had a negative predictive impact on response at first evaluation (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03) and at best response (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = 0.056). Three significant (p < 0.05) prognostic factors associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were identified. These factors were included in the final model for OS, namely corticosteroid use (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18-2.45; p = 0.004), neurocognitive deficit (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.89; p = 0.03) and multifocal disease (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11; p < 0.0001). Based on these results a prognostic index able to calculate the probability for OS at 6 and 12 months for the individual patient was established. The predictive value of the model for OS was validated in a separate patient cohort of 85 patients.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A prognostic model for OS was established and validated. This model can be used by physicians to risk stratify the individual patient and together with the patient decide whether to initiate BEV relapse treatment.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679

DO - 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26828563

VL - 55

SP - 418

EP - 422

JO - Acta Oncologica

JF - Acta Oncologica

SN - 1100-1704

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 164817376