Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection. / Bundgaard, Johan S.; Raaschou-Pedersen, Daniel T.; Todsen, Tobias; Ringgaard, Anna; Torp-Pedersen, Christian; Von Buchwald, Christian; Iversen, Kasper; Bundgaard, Henning.

I: International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Bind 109, 2021, s. 195-198.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bundgaard, JS, Raaschou-Pedersen, DT, Todsen, T, Ringgaard, A, Torp-Pedersen, C, Von Buchwald, C, Iversen, K & Bundgaard, H 2021, 'Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection', International Journal of Infectious Diseases, bind 109, s. 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060

APA

Bundgaard, J. S., Raaschou-Pedersen, D. T., Todsen, T., Ringgaard, A., Torp-Pedersen, C., Von Buchwald, C., Iversen, K., & Bundgaard, H. (2021). Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 109, 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060

Vancouver

Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DT, Todsen T, Ringgaard A, Torp-Pedersen C, Von Buchwald C o.a. Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;109:195-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060

Author

Bundgaard, Johan S. ; Raaschou-Pedersen, Daniel T. ; Todsen, Tobias ; Ringgaard, Anna ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian ; Von Buchwald, Christian ; Iversen, Kasper ; Bundgaard, Henning. / Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection. I: International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021 ; Bind 109. s. 195-198.

Bibtex

@article{4e7353a04d78455592a418eea9c304ba,
title = "Danish citizens{\textquoteright} preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection",
abstract = "Introduction: Diagnostic confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 by self-collection of specimens is a reliable method compared with healthcare worker collected samples. Citizens{\textquoteright} preferences for collection methods are unknown, but at-home collection could have several advantages. Methods: This study investigated the preference for guided at-home self-collection versus at-hospital specimen collection by healthcare workers. Results: Among the 3709 participants, at-home swab collection was the preferred setting for 2362 (63.7%) compared with 1347 (36.3%) reporting a preference for an at-hospital swabbing procedure. Conclusion: A high preference for guided at-home self-collection of oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimens exists and could be a future norm beyond COVID-19.",
keywords = "COVID-19, Diagnostics, Oropharyngeal/nasal swab, Patient-reported, SARS-CoV-2, Self-collection",
author = "Bundgaard, {Johan S.} and Raaschou-Pedersen, {Daniel T.} and Tobias Todsen and Anna Ringgaard and Christian Torp-Pedersen and {Von Buchwald}, Christian and Kasper Iversen and Henning Bundgaard",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s)",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "195--198",
journal = "International Journal of Infectious Diseases",
issn = "1201-9712",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Danish citizens’ preferences for at-home oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimen collection

AU - Bundgaard, Johan S.

AU - Raaschou-Pedersen, Daniel T.

AU - Todsen, Tobias

AU - Ringgaard, Anna

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

AU - Von Buchwald, Christian

AU - Iversen, Kasper

AU - Bundgaard, Henning

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Introduction: Diagnostic confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 by self-collection of specimens is a reliable method compared with healthcare worker collected samples. Citizens’ preferences for collection methods are unknown, but at-home collection could have several advantages. Methods: This study investigated the preference for guided at-home self-collection versus at-hospital specimen collection by healthcare workers. Results: Among the 3709 participants, at-home swab collection was the preferred setting for 2362 (63.7%) compared with 1347 (36.3%) reporting a preference for an at-hospital swabbing procedure. Conclusion: A high preference for guided at-home self-collection of oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimens exists and could be a future norm beyond COVID-19.

AB - Introduction: Diagnostic confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 by self-collection of specimens is a reliable method compared with healthcare worker collected samples. Citizens’ preferences for collection methods are unknown, but at-home collection could have several advantages. Methods: This study investigated the preference for guided at-home self-collection versus at-hospital specimen collection by healthcare workers. Results: Among the 3709 participants, at-home swab collection was the preferred setting for 2362 (63.7%) compared with 1347 (36.3%) reporting a preference for an at-hospital swabbing procedure. Conclusion: A high preference for guided at-home self-collection of oropharyngeal/nasal SARS-CoV-2 specimens exists and could be a future norm beyond COVID-19.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Diagnostics

KW - Oropharyngeal/nasal swab

KW - Patient-reported

KW - SARS-CoV-2

KW - Self-collection

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060

DO - 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.060

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34216732

AN - SCOPUS:85111197401

VL - 109

SP - 195

EP - 198

JO - International Journal of Infectious Diseases

JF - International Journal of Infectious Diseases

SN - 1201-9712

ER -

ID: 275883927