CUL MS Gg.4.18
Publikation: Andet › Udgivelser på nettet - Net-publikation › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
CUL MS Gg.4.18. / Henriksen, Anni Haahr .
Cambridge University Digital Library : Cambridge University Digital Library. 2018manuscript description of John Walton's Middle English Translation on Boethius's De Consolatione Philosophiae, ca. mid-fifteenth century..Publikation: Andet › Udgivelser på nettet - Net-publikation › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - ICOMM
T1 - CUL MS Gg.4.18
AU - Henriksen, Anni Haahr
PY - 2018/6/7
Y1 - 2018/6/7
N2 - PhD fellow at the Centre for Privacy Studies, Anni Haahr Henriksen, has recently published her codicological and palaeographical description of CUL MS Gg.4.18 on the Cambridge University Library’s digital collection. MS Gg. 4.18 is a 15th century Middle English verse translation of Boethius’s Consolatione Philosophiae. In her description, Anni pays special attention to two pieces of marginalia, found on folios 20v and 33v. These two examples of marginalia and the form of textual engagement that they represent, Anni argues, imply a form of isolated communication with the text where the physical manuscript becomes a locus of private textual interaction. This ‘private textual interaction’, Anni argues, is unusual for its time and raises questions about medieval readers and reading practices.
AB - PhD fellow at the Centre for Privacy Studies, Anni Haahr Henriksen, has recently published her codicological and palaeographical description of CUL MS Gg.4.18 on the Cambridge University Library’s digital collection. MS Gg. 4.18 is a 15th century Middle English verse translation of Boethius’s Consolatione Philosophiae. In her description, Anni pays special attention to two pieces of marginalia, found on folios 20v and 33v. These two examples of marginalia and the form of textual engagement that they represent, Anni argues, imply a form of isolated communication with the text where the physical manuscript becomes a locus of private textual interaction. This ‘private textual interaction’, Anni argues, is unusual for its time and raises questions about medieval readers and reading practices.
M3 - Net publication - Internet publication
PB - Cambridge University Digital Library
CY - Cambridge University Digital Library
ER -
ID: 199070935