Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk: results from the NOTION trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk : results from the NOTION trial. / Geisler, Benjamin P; Jørgensen, Troels H; Thyregod, Hans Gustav H; Pietzsch, Jan Benjamin; Søndergaard, Lars.

I: EuroIntervention, Bind 15, Nr. 11, 2019, s. e959-e967.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Geisler, BP, Jørgensen, TH, Thyregod, HGH, Pietzsch, JB & Søndergaard, L 2019, 'Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk: results from the NOTION trial', EuroIntervention, bind 15, nr. 11, s. e959-e967. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847

APA

Geisler, B. P., Jørgensen, T. H., Thyregod, H. G. H., Pietzsch, J. B., & Søndergaard, L. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk: results from the NOTION trial. EuroIntervention, 15(11), e959-e967. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847

Vancouver

Geisler BP, Jørgensen TH, Thyregod HGH, Pietzsch JB, Søndergaard L. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk: results from the NOTION trial. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(11):e959-e967. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847

Author

Geisler, Benjamin P ; Jørgensen, Troels H ; Thyregod, Hans Gustav H ; Pietzsch, Jan Benjamin ; Søndergaard, Lars. / Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk : results from the NOTION trial. I: EuroIntervention. 2019 ; Bind 15, Nr. 11. s. e959-e967.

Bibtex

@article{e2a244ac27de4bc9b273f5bc7ba11b93,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk: results from the NOTION trial",
abstract = "AIMS: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at lower surgical risk.METHODS AND RESULTS: Discounted costs from a societal perspective and effectiveness as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were projected to lifetime via a decision-analytic model calibrated to 60-month data from the NOTION trial. The base case assumed a scenario in which any mortality benefit would gradually fade out over time, with other scenarios explored in sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to the country-specific willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1.13 million Danish kroner (DKK). The base case ICER was DKK 696,264/QALY (around €72,100/QALY via purchasing parity adjustment). Variation in long-term mortality beyond five years led to limited variation of incremental costs (DKK 64,200 to 64,600), but a more pronounced variation in incremental QALYs (0.07 to 0.19 QALYs for most conservative and optimistic assumptions, compared to base case of 0.09 QALYs). All resulting ICERs (range DKK 334,200 to DKK 904,100 per QALY gained) were below the WTP threshold.CONCLUSIONS: TAVI in a cohort of primarily low surgical risk patients was found to be a cost-effective treatment strategy in the Danish healthcare system. Cost-effectiveness analyses in other settings are warranted as are registries given the sensitivity of the model to long-term mortality.",
keywords = "Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement",
author = "Geisler, {Benjamin P} and J{\o}rgensen, {Troels H} and Thyregod, {Hans Gustav H} and Pietzsch, {Jan Benjamin} and Lars S{\o}ndergaard",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "e959--e967",
journal = "EuroIntervention",
issn = "1774-024X",
publisher = "Europa Digital & Publishing",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at lower surgical risk

T2 - results from the NOTION trial

AU - Geisler, Benjamin P

AU - Jørgensen, Troels H

AU - Thyregod, Hans Gustav H

AU - Pietzsch, Jan Benjamin

AU - Søndergaard, Lars

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - AIMS: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at lower surgical risk.METHODS AND RESULTS: Discounted costs from a societal perspective and effectiveness as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were projected to lifetime via a decision-analytic model calibrated to 60-month data from the NOTION trial. The base case assumed a scenario in which any mortality benefit would gradually fade out over time, with other scenarios explored in sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to the country-specific willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1.13 million Danish kroner (DKK). The base case ICER was DKK 696,264/QALY (around €72,100/QALY via purchasing parity adjustment). Variation in long-term mortality beyond five years led to limited variation of incremental costs (DKK 64,200 to 64,600), but a more pronounced variation in incremental QALYs (0.07 to 0.19 QALYs for most conservative and optimistic assumptions, compared to base case of 0.09 QALYs). All resulting ICERs (range DKK 334,200 to DKK 904,100 per QALY gained) were below the WTP threshold.CONCLUSIONS: TAVI in a cohort of primarily low surgical risk patients was found to be a cost-effective treatment strategy in the Danish healthcare system. Cost-effectiveness analyses in other settings are warranted as are registries given the sensitivity of the model to long-term mortality.

AB - AIMS: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at lower surgical risk.METHODS AND RESULTS: Discounted costs from a societal perspective and effectiveness as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were projected to lifetime via a decision-analytic model calibrated to 60-month data from the NOTION trial. The base case assumed a scenario in which any mortality benefit would gradually fade out over time, with other scenarios explored in sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to the country-specific willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1.13 million Danish kroner (DKK). The base case ICER was DKK 696,264/QALY (around €72,100/QALY via purchasing parity adjustment). Variation in long-term mortality beyond five years led to limited variation of incremental costs (DKK 64,200 to 64,600), but a more pronounced variation in incremental QALYs (0.07 to 0.19 QALYs for most conservative and optimistic assumptions, compared to base case of 0.09 QALYs). All resulting ICERs (range DKK 334,200 to DKK 904,100 per QALY gained) were below the WTP threshold.CONCLUSIONS: TAVI in a cohort of primarily low surgical risk patients was found to be a cost-effective treatment strategy in the Danish healthcare system. Cost-effectiveness analyses in other settings are warranted as are registries given the sensitivity of the model to long-term mortality.

KW - Aortic Valve

KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis

KW - Humans

KW - Quality-Adjusted Life Years

KW - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

U2 - 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847

DO - 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00847

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31422922

VL - 15

SP - e959-e967

JO - EuroIntervention

JF - EuroIntervention

SN - 1774-024X

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 241013053