Confidence scores for prediction models

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Confidence scores for prediction models. / Gerds, Thomas Alexander; van de Wiel, MA.

I: Biometrical Journal, Bind 53, Nr. 2, 03.2011, s. 259-274.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gerds, TA & van de Wiel, MA 2011, 'Confidence scores for prediction models', Biometrical Journal, bind 53, nr. 2, s. 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201000157

APA

Gerds, T. A., & van de Wiel, MA. (2011). Confidence scores for prediction models. Biometrical Journal, 53(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201000157

Vancouver

Gerds TA, van de Wiel MA. Confidence scores for prediction models. Biometrical Journal. 2011 mar.;53(2):259-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201000157

Author

Gerds, Thomas Alexander ; van de Wiel, MA. / Confidence scores for prediction models. I: Biometrical Journal. 2011 ; Bind 53, Nr. 2. s. 259-274.

Bibtex

@article{c7cface76fea46bca8df94d8c8335c1a,
title = "Confidence scores for prediction models",
abstract = "In medical statistics, many alternative strategies are available for building a prediction model based on training data. Prediction models are routinely compared by means of their prediction performance in independent validation data. If only one data set is available for training and validation, then rival strategies can still be compared based on repeated bootstraps of the same data. Often, however, the overall performance of rival strategies is similar and it is thus difficult to decide for one model. Here, we investigate the variability of the prediction models that results when the same modelling strategy is applied to different training sets. For each modelling strategy we estimate a confidence score based on the same repeated bootstraps. A new decomposition of the expected Brier score is obtained, as well as the estimates of population average confidence scores. The latter can be used to distinguish rival prediction models with similar prediction performances. Furthermore, on the subject level a confidence score may provide useful supplementary information for new patients who want to base a medical decision on predicted risk. The ideas are illustrated and discussed using data from cancer studies, also with high-dimensional predictor space.",
author = "Gerds, {Thomas Alexander} and {van de Wiel}, MA",
year = "2011",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/bimj.201000157",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "259--274",
journal = "Biometrical Journal",
issn = "0323-3847",
publisher = "Wiley - V C H Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confidence scores for prediction models

AU - Gerds, Thomas Alexander

AU - van de Wiel, MA

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - In medical statistics, many alternative strategies are available for building a prediction model based on training data. Prediction models are routinely compared by means of their prediction performance in independent validation data. If only one data set is available for training and validation, then rival strategies can still be compared based on repeated bootstraps of the same data. Often, however, the overall performance of rival strategies is similar and it is thus difficult to decide for one model. Here, we investigate the variability of the prediction models that results when the same modelling strategy is applied to different training sets. For each modelling strategy we estimate a confidence score based on the same repeated bootstraps. A new decomposition of the expected Brier score is obtained, as well as the estimates of population average confidence scores. The latter can be used to distinguish rival prediction models with similar prediction performances. Furthermore, on the subject level a confidence score may provide useful supplementary information for new patients who want to base a medical decision on predicted risk. The ideas are illustrated and discussed using data from cancer studies, also with high-dimensional predictor space.

AB - In medical statistics, many alternative strategies are available for building a prediction model based on training data. Prediction models are routinely compared by means of their prediction performance in independent validation data. If only one data set is available for training and validation, then rival strategies can still be compared based on repeated bootstraps of the same data. Often, however, the overall performance of rival strategies is similar and it is thus difficult to decide for one model. Here, we investigate the variability of the prediction models that results when the same modelling strategy is applied to different training sets. For each modelling strategy we estimate a confidence score based on the same repeated bootstraps. A new decomposition of the expected Brier score is obtained, as well as the estimates of population average confidence scores. The latter can be used to distinguish rival prediction models with similar prediction performances. Furthermore, on the subject level a confidence score may provide useful supplementary information for new patients who want to base a medical decision on predicted risk. The ideas are illustrated and discussed using data from cancer studies, also with high-dimensional predictor space.

U2 - 10.1002/bimj.201000157

DO - 10.1002/bimj.201000157

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21328604

VL - 53

SP - 259

EP - 274

JO - Biometrical Journal

JF - Biometrical Journal

SN - 0323-3847

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 33917412