Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Schoos, Ann-Marie Malby; Chawes, Bo Lund; Bloch, Joakim; Hansen, Britta; Stokholm, Jakob; Bønnelykke, Klaus; Kristensen, Bjarne; Bisgaard, Hans.

I: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, Bind 8, Nr. 5, 05.2020, s. 1592-1597.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schoos, A-MM, Chawes, BL, Bloch, J, Hansen, B, Stokholm, J, Bønnelykke, K, Kristensen, B & Bisgaard, H 2020, 'Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial', The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, bind 8, nr. 5, s. 1592-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.012

APA

Schoos, A-M. M., Chawes, B. L., Bloch, J., Hansen, B., Stokholm, J., Bønnelykke, K., Kristensen, B., & Bisgaard, H. (2020). Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 8(5), 1592-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.012

Vancouver

Schoos A-MM, Chawes BL, Bloch J, Hansen B, Stokholm J, Bønnelykke K o.a. Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2020 maj;8(5):1592-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.012

Author

Schoos, Ann-Marie Malby ; Chawes, Bo Lund ; Bloch, Joakim ; Hansen, Britta ; Stokholm, Jakob ; Bønnelykke, Klaus ; Kristensen, Bjarne ; Bisgaard, Hans. / Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation : A Randomized Controlled Trial. I: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2020 ; Bind 8, Nr. 5. s. 1592-1597.

Bibtex

@article{002cc656a1b6459994f0723ee4dffe2b,
title = "Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Dog dander consists of several allergenic molecules including Can f 5, which is a protein expressed in the prostate of male dogs.OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to provocation tests with male versus female dog dander in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.METHODS: Twenty-two children (15-18 years) with a history of dog sensitization were enrolled from the COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood2000 mother-child cohort. Skin prick test, specific IgE levels to dog dander (e5), and dog components Can f 1, 2, 3, and 5 were first assessed. We subsequently performed skin prick test and conjunctival allergen provocation test using dog dander collected separately from male and female dogs.RESULTS: Seven of the 22 children were monosensitized to Can f 5. Eight were sensitized to a mix of the dog components, and 7 were no longer sensitized to dog. Of the children monosensitized to Can f 5, all had a positive skin prick test result to male dog extract and 1 of 7 was also positive to female dog extract (P = .01). Furthermore, 5 of 7 had a positive conjunctival allergen provocation test result to male dog extract and 1 of 7 also reacted to the female dog extract (P = .03). There was no difference between reactions to male and female dog extract provocation in children sensitized to a mix of the dog components.CONCLUSIONS: Children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to male and female dog extract provocation using both skin prick test and conjunctival allergen provocation test, suggesting tolerance to female dogs.",
author = "Schoos, {Ann-Marie Malby} and Chawes, {Bo Lund} and Joakim Bloch and Britta Hansen and Jakob Stokholm and Klaus B{\o}nnelykke and Bjarne Kristensen and Hans Bisgaard",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.012",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1592--1597",
journal = "The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice",
issn = "2213-2198",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Schoos, Ann-Marie Malby

AU - Chawes, Bo Lund

AU - Bloch, Joakim

AU - Hansen, Britta

AU - Stokholm, Jakob

AU - Bønnelykke, Klaus

AU - Kristensen, Bjarne

AU - Bisgaard, Hans

N1 - Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/5

Y1 - 2020/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: Dog dander consists of several allergenic molecules including Can f 5, which is a protein expressed in the prostate of male dogs.OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to provocation tests with male versus female dog dander in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.METHODS: Twenty-two children (15-18 years) with a history of dog sensitization were enrolled from the COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood2000 mother-child cohort. Skin prick test, specific IgE levels to dog dander (e5), and dog components Can f 1, 2, 3, and 5 were first assessed. We subsequently performed skin prick test and conjunctival allergen provocation test using dog dander collected separately from male and female dogs.RESULTS: Seven of the 22 children were monosensitized to Can f 5. Eight were sensitized to a mix of the dog components, and 7 were no longer sensitized to dog. Of the children monosensitized to Can f 5, all had a positive skin prick test result to male dog extract and 1 of 7 was also positive to female dog extract (P = .01). Furthermore, 5 of 7 had a positive conjunctival allergen provocation test result to male dog extract and 1 of 7 also reacted to the female dog extract (P = .03). There was no difference between reactions to male and female dog extract provocation in children sensitized to a mix of the dog components.CONCLUSIONS: Children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to male and female dog extract provocation using both skin prick test and conjunctival allergen provocation test, suggesting tolerance to female dogs.

AB - BACKGROUND: Dog dander consists of several allergenic molecules including Can f 5, which is a protein expressed in the prostate of male dogs.OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to provocation tests with male versus female dog dander in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.METHODS: Twenty-two children (15-18 years) with a history of dog sensitization were enrolled from the COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood2000 mother-child cohort. Skin prick test, specific IgE levels to dog dander (e5), and dog components Can f 1, 2, 3, and 5 were first assessed. We subsequently performed skin prick test and conjunctival allergen provocation test using dog dander collected separately from male and female dogs.RESULTS: Seven of the 22 children were monosensitized to Can f 5. Eight were sensitized to a mix of the dog components, and 7 were no longer sensitized to dog. Of the children monosensitized to Can f 5, all had a positive skin prick test result to male dog extract and 1 of 7 was also positive to female dog extract (P = .01). Furthermore, 5 of 7 had a positive conjunctival allergen provocation test result to male dog extract and 1 of 7 also reacted to the female dog extract (P = .03). There was no difference between reactions to male and female dog extract provocation in children sensitized to a mix of the dog components.CONCLUSIONS: Children monosensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to male and female dog extract provocation using both skin prick test and conjunctival allergen provocation test, suggesting tolerance to female dogs.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.012

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31863911

VL - 8

SP - 1592

EP - 1597

JO - The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice

JF - The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice

SN - 2213-2198

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 259830908