Broad-scale patterns of geographic avoidance between species emerge in the absence of fine-scale mechanisms of coexistence

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Roberto Novella-Fernandez
  • Javier Juste
  • Carlos Ibáñez
  • Hugo Rebelo
  • Danilo Russo
  • Alberdi Estibaritz, Antton
  • Andreas Kiefer
  • Laura Graham
  • Hynek Paul
  • Charles Patrick Doncaster
  • Orly Razgour

Aim: The need to forecast range shifts under future climate change has motivated an increasing interest in better understanding the role of biotic interactions in driving diversity patterns. The contribution of biotic interactions to shaping broad-scale species distributions is, however, still debated, partly due to the difficulty of detecting their effects. We aim to test whether spatial exclusion between potentially competing species can be detected at the species range scale, and whether this pattern relates to fine-scale mechanisms of coexistence. Location: Western Palearctic. Methods: We develop and evaluate a measure of geographic avoidance that uses outputs of species distribution models to quantify geographic exclusion patterns expected if interspecific competition affects broad-scale distributions. We apply the measure to 10 Palearctic bat species belonging to four morphologically similar cryptic groups in which competition is likely to occur. We compare outputs to null models based on pairs of virtual species and to expectations based on ecological similarity and fine-scale coexistence mechanisms. We project changes in range suitability under climate change taking into account effects of geographic avoidance. Results: Values of geographic avoidance were above null expectations for two cryptic species pairs, suggesting that interspecific competition could have contributed to shaping their broad-scale distributions. These two pairs showed highest levels of ecological similarity and no trophic or habitat partitioning. Considering the role of competition modified predictions of future range suitability. Main conclusions: Our results support the role of interspecific competition in limiting the geographic ranges of morphologically similar species in the absence of fine-scale mechanisms of coexistence. This study highlights the importance of incorporating biotic interactions into predictive models of range shifts under climate change, and the need for further integration of community ecology with species distribution models to understand the role of competition in ecology and biogeography.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDiversity and Distributions
Vol/bind27
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1606-1618
Antal sider13
ISSN1366-9516
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to Petr Benda and Helena Santos for providing location records and publications and to Jane Catford, Felix Eigenbrod and Kelvin Peh for comments on the work. RN‐F was funded through a University of Southampton PhD studentship. OR was funded through a NERC Independent Research Fellowship (NE/M018660/1). This work was supported by the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts via the Bavarian Climate Research Network bayklif (project “mintbio”).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 275989863