Balloon Versus Self-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: Insights From the BEAT International Collaborative Registrys
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Balloon Versus Self-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis : Insights From the BEAT International Collaborative Registrys. / Mangieri, Antonio; Tchetchè, Didier; Kim, Won-Keun; Pagnesi, Matteo; Sinning, Jean-Malte; Landes, Uri; Kornowski, Ran; De Backer, Ole; Nickenig, Georg; Ielasi, Alfonso; De Biase, Chiara; Søndergaard, Lars; De Marco, Federico; Montorfano, Matteo; Chiarito, Mauro; Regazzoli, Damiano; Stefanini, Giulio; Presbitero, Patrizia; Toggweiler, Stefan; Tamburino, Corrado; Immè, Sebastiano; Tarantini, Giuseppe; Sievert, Horst; Schäfer, Ulrich; Kempfert, Jörg; Wöehrle, Jochen; Gallo, Francesco; Laricchia, Alessandra; Latib, Azeem; Giannini, Francesco; Colombo, Antonio.
I: Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions, Bind 13, Nr. 7, e008714, 2020.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Balloon Versus Self-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
T2 - Insights From the BEAT International Collaborative Registrys
AU - Mangieri, Antonio
AU - Tchetchè, Didier
AU - Kim, Won-Keun
AU - Pagnesi, Matteo
AU - Sinning, Jean-Malte
AU - Landes, Uri
AU - Kornowski, Ran
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Nickenig, Georg
AU - Ielasi, Alfonso
AU - De Biase, Chiara
AU - Søndergaard, Lars
AU - De Marco, Federico
AU - Montorfano, Matteo
AU - Chiarito, Mauro
AU - Regazzoli, Damiano
AU - Stefanini, Giulio
AU - Presbitero, Patrizia
AU - Toggweiler, Stefan
AU - Tamburino, Corrado
AU - Immè, Sebastiano
AU - Tarantini, Giuseppe
AU - Sievert, Horst
AU - Schäfer, Ulrich
AU - Kempfert, Jörg
AU - Wöehrle, Jochen
AU - Gallo, Francesco
AU - Laricchia, Alessandra
AU - Latib, Azeem
AU - Giannini, Francesco
AU - Colombo, Antonio
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - BACKGROUND: Large data comparing the performance of new-generation self-expandable versus balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in bicuspid aortic stenosis are lacking. We aim to compare the safety and performance of balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves in the treatment of bicuspid aortic stenosis.METHODS: The BEAT (balloon versus self-expandable valve for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis) registry included 353 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using new-generation Evolut R/PRO or Sapien 3 valves in bicuspid aortic valve.RESULTS: A total of 353 patients (n=242 [68.6%] treated with Sapien 3 and n=111 [68.6%] treated with Evolut R (n=70)/PRO [n=41]) were included. Mean age was 77.8±8.3 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.4±3.3%. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 device success was similar between Sapien 3 and Evolut R/PRO (85.6% versus 87.2%; P=0.68). In the Sapien 3 group, 4 patients experienced annular rupture whereas this complication did not occur in the Evolut R/PRO group. After propensity score matching, Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 device success was similar between both groups (Sapien 3=85.7% versus Evolut R/Pro=84.4%; P=0.821). Both in the overall and in the matched population, no differences in the rate of permanent pacemaker implant were observed. At 1-year follow-up, the rate of overall death and cardiovascular death were similar between the 2 groups. In the unmatched population, the 1-year echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated similar rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (Evolut R/PRO 10.5% versus Sapien 3 4.2%, P=0.077); however, after propensity matching, the rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak became significantly higher among patients treated with self-expandable valves (9.3% versus 0%; P=0.043).CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility of both Sapien 3 and Evolut R/PRO implantation in bicuspid aortic valve anatomy; a higher rate of moderate-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation was observed in the Evolut R/PRO group at 1-year follow-up in the matched cohort, although patients treated with balloon-expandable valve had a higher rate of annular rupture.
AB - BACKGROUND: Large data comparing the performance of new-generation self-expandable versus balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in bicuspid aortic stenosis are lacking. We aim to compare the safety and performance of balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves in the treatment of bicuspid aortic stenosis.METHODS: The BEAT (balloon versus self-expandable valve for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis) registry included 353 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using new-generation Evolut R/PRO or Sapien 3 valves in bicuspid aortic valve.RESULTS: A total of 353 patients (n=242 [68.6%] treated with Sapien 3 and n=111 [68.6%] treated with Evolut R (n=70)/PRO [n=41]) were included. Mean age was 77.8±8.3 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.4±3.3%. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 device success was similar between Sapien 3 and Evolut R/PRO (85.6% versus 87.2%; P=0.68). In the Sapien 3 group, 4 patients experienced annular rupture whereas this complication did not occur in the Evolut R/PRO group. After propensity score matching, Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 device success was similar between both groups (Sapien 3=85.7% versus Evolut R/Pro=84.4%; P=0.821). Both in the overall and in the matched population, no differences in the rate of permanent pacemaker implant were observed. At 1-year follow-up, the rate of overall death and cardiovascular death were similar between the 2 groups. In the unmatched population, the 1-year echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated similar rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (Evolut R/PRO 10.5% versus Sapien 3 4.2%, P=0.077); however, after propensity matching, the rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak became significantly higher among patients treated with self-expandable valves (9.3% versus 0%; P=0.043).CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility of both Sapien 3 and Evolut R/PRO implantation in bicuspid aortic valve anatomy; a higher rate of moderate-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation was observed in the Evolut R/PRO group at 1-year follow-up in the matched cohort, although patients treated with balloon-expandable valve had a higher rate of annular rupture.
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008714
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008714
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32646304
VL - 13
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
SN - 1941-7640
IS - 7
M1 - e008714
ER -
ID: 261179973