Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe. / Nagirnaja, Liina; Nõmmemees, Diana; Rull, Kristiina; Christiansen, Ole B; Nielsen, Henriette Svarre; Laan, Maris.

I: P L o S One, Bind 10, Nr. 7, e0131606, 2015, s. 1-15.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nagirnaja, L, Nõmmemees, D, Rull, K, Christiansen, OB, Nielsen, HS & Laan, M 2015, 'Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe', P L o S One, bind 10, nr. 7, e0131606, s. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131606

APA

Nagirnaja, L., Nõmmemees, D., Rull, K., Christiansen, O. B., Nielsen, H. S., & Laan, M. (2015). Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe. P L o S One, 10(7), 1-15. [e0131606]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131606

Vancouver

Nagirnaja L, Nõmmemees D, Rull K, Christiansen OB, Nielsen HS, Laan M. Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe. P L o S One. 2015;10(7):1-15. e0131606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131606

Author

Nagirnaja, Liina ; Nõmmemees, Diana ; Rull, Kristiina ; Christiansen, Ole B ; Nielsen, Henriette Svarre ; Laan, Maris. / Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe. I: P L o S One. 2015 ; Bind 10, Nr. 7. s. 1-15.

Bibtex

@article{b9e36e6600264d628a4d9910d003621e,
title = "Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Annexin A5 is an essential component of placental integrity that may potentially mediate susceptibility to phenotypes of compromised pregnancy. A promoter haplotype termed M2 of the coding gene ANXA5 has been implicated in various pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), however with inconclusive results.STUDY SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study combining resequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was undertaken in 313 women with unexplained RPL and 214 fertile women from Estonia and Denmark to estimate the RPL disease risk of the M2 haplotype in Northern Europe. Comparative prevalence of the studied ANXA5 genetic variants in human populations was estimated based on the 1000 Genomes Project (n = 675, whole-genome sequencing data) and the KORA S3 500K dataset of South German samples (n = 1644, genome-wide genotyping data).RESULTS: Minor allele frequency of common polymorphisms in ANXA5 promoter was up to two-fold lower among Estonian RPL subjects than fertile controls. The M2 haplotype was not associated with RPL and a trend for decreased prevalence was observed among RPL patients compared to controls both in Estonia (8.1% vs 15.2%, respectively) and Denmark (9.7% vs 12.6%). The high M2 prevalence in fertile controls was consistent with estimations for European and East Asian populations (9.6%-16.0%).CONCLUSIONS: This study cautions to consider the M2 haplotype as a deterministic factor in early pregnancy success because: i) no RPL disease risk was associated with the haplotype in two clinically well-characterized RPL case-control study samples, ii) high prevalence of the haplotype among fertile controls and world-wide populations is inconsistent with the previously proposed severe impact on early pregnancy success, iii) weak impact of M2 haplotype on the production of ANXA5 protein has been established by others.",
keywords = "Abortion, Habitual, Adult, Alleles, Annexin A5, Case-Control Studies, Denmark, Estonia, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Placenta, Polymorphism, Genetic, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Prevalence, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Young Adult",
author = "Liina Nagirnaja and Diana N{\~o}mmemees and Kristiina Rull and Christiansen, {Ole B} and Nielsen, {Henriette Svarre} and Maris Laan",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0131606",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Annexin A5 Promoter Haplotype M2 Is Not a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Northern Europe

AU - Nagirnaja, Liina

AU - Nõmmemees, Diana

AU - Rull, Kristiina

AU - Christiansen, Ole B

AU - Nielsen, Henriette Svarre

AU - Laan, Maris

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Annexin A5 is an essential component of placental integrity that may potentially mediate susceptibility to phenotypes of compromised pregnancy. A promoter haplotype termed M2 of the coding gene ANXA5 has been implicated in various pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), however with inconclusive results.STUDY SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study combining resequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was undertaken in 313 women with unexplained RPL and 214 fertile women from Estonia and Denmark to estimate the RPL disease risk of the M2 haplotype in Northern Europe. Comparative prevalence of the studied ANXA5 genetic variants in human populations was estimated based on the 1000 Genomes Project (n = 675, whole-genome sequencing data) and the KORA S3 500K dataset of South German samples (n = 1644, genome-wide genotyping data).RESULTS: Minor allele frequency of common polymorphisms in ANXA5 promoter was up to two-fold lower among Estonian RPL subjects than fertile controls. The M2 haplotype was not associated with RPL and a trend for decreased prevalence was observed among RPL patients compared to controls both in Estonia (8.1% vs 15.2%, respectively) and Denmark (9.7% vs 12.6%). The high M2 prevalence in fertile controls was consistent with estimations for European and East Asian populations (9.6%-16.0%).CONCLUSIONS: This study cautions to consider the M2 haplotype as a deterministic factor in early pregnancy success because: i) no RPL disease risk was associated with the haplotype in two clinically well-characterized RPL case-control study samples, ii) high prevalence of the haplotype among fertile controls and world-wide populations is inconsistent with the previously proposed severe impact on early pregnancy success, iii) weak impact of M2 haplotype on the production of ANXA5 protein has been established by others.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Annexin A5 is an essential component of placental integrity that may potentially mediate susceptibility to phenotypes of compromised pregnancy. A promoter haplotype termed M2 of the coding gene ANXA5 has been implicated in various pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), however with inconclusive results.STUDY SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study combining resequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was undertaken in 313 women with unexplained RPL and 214 fertile women from Estonia and Denmark to estimate the RPL disease risk of the M2 haplotype in Northern Europe. Comparative prevalence of the studied ANXA5 genetic variants in human populations was estimated based on the 1000 Genomes Project (n = 675, whole-genome sequencing data) and the KORA S3 500K dataset of South German samples (n = 1644, genome-wide genotyping data).RESULTS: Minor allele frequency of common polymorphisms in ANXA5 promoter was up to two-fold lower among Estonian RPL subjects than fertile controls. The M2 haplotype was not associated with RPL and a trend for decreased prevalence was observed among RPL patients compared to controls both in Estonia (8.1% vs 15.2%, respectively) and Denmark (9.7% vs 12.6%). The high M2 prevalence in fertile controls was consistent with estimations for European and East Asian populations (9.6%-16.0%).CONCLUSIONS: This study cautions to consider the M2 haplotype as a deterministic factor in early pregnancy success because: i) no RPL disease risk was associated with the haplotype in two clinically well-characterized RPL case-control study samples, ii) high prevalence of the haplotype among fertile controls and world-wide populations is inconsistent with the previously proposed severe impact on early pregnancy success, iii) weak impact of M2 haplotype on the production of ANXA5 protein has been established by others.

KW - Abortion, Habitual

KW - Adult

KW - Alleles

KW - Annexin A5

KW - Case-Control Studies

KW - Denmark

KW - Estonia

KW - Female

KW - Genetic Predisposition to Disease

KW - Genome-Wide Association Study

KW - Genotype

KW - Haplotypes

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Phenotype

KW - Placenta

KW - Polymorphism, Genetic

KW - Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length

KW - Pre-Eclampsia

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Prevalence

KW - Promoter Regions, Genetic

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131606

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131606

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26135579

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0131606

ER -

ID: 161848505