An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis : a cross-sectional validation study. / Riecke, B F; Christensen, R.; Torp-Pedersen, S; Boesen, M; Gudbergsen, H; Bliddal, H.

I: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Bind 22, Nr. 10, 2014, s. 1675-91.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Riecke, BF, Christensen, R, Torp-Pedersen, S, Boesen, M, Gudbergsen, H & Bliddal, H 2014, 'An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study', Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, bind 22, nr. 10, s. 1675-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.020

APA

Riecke, B. F., Christensen, R., Torp-Pedersen, S., Boesen, M., Gudbergsen, H., & Bliddal, H. (2014). An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22(10), 1675-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.020

Vancouver

Riecke BF, Christensen R, Torp-Pedersen S, Boesen M, Gudbergsen H, Bliddal H. An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2014;22(10):1675-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.020

Author

Riecke, B F ; Christensen, R. ; Torp-Pedersen, S ; Boesen, M ; Gudbergsen, H ; Bliddal, H. / An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis : a cross-sectional validation study. I: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2014 ; Bind 22, Nr. 10. s. 1675-91.

Bibtex

@article{fd25d3ac22a249fe82263024710765e8,
title = "An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To develop standardized musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS) procedures and scoring for detecting knee osteoarthritis (OA) and test the MUS score's ability to discern various degrees of knee OA, in comparison with plain radiography and the 'Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score' (KOOS) domains as comparators.METHOD: A cross-sectional study of MUS examinations in 45 patients with knee OA. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility were evaluated.RESULTS: MUS examination for knee OA consists of five separate domains assessing (1) predominantly morphological changes in the medial compartment, (2) predominantly inflammation in the medial compartment, (3) predominantly morphological changes in the lateral compartment, (4) predominantly inflammation in the lateral compartment, and (5) effusion. MUS scores displayed substantial reliability and reproducibility, with interclass correlations coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.97 for the five domains. Construct validity was confirmed with statistically significant correlation coefficients (0.47-0.81, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: The MUS score suggested in this study was reliable and valid in detecting knee OA. In comparison with standing radiographs of the knees, the score detected all aspects of knee OA with relevant precision.",
author = "Riecke, {B F} and R. Christensen and S Torp-Pedersen and M Boesen and H Gudbergsen and H Bliddal",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.020",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1675--91",
journal = "Osteoarthritis and Cartilage",
issn = "1063-4584",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis

T2 - a cross-sectional validation study

AU - Riecke, B F

AU - Christensen, R.

AU - Torp-Pedersen, S

AU - Boesen, M

AU - Gudbergsen, H

AU - Bliddal, H

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To develop standardized musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS) procedures and scoring for detecting knee osteoarthritis (OA) and test the MUS score's ability to discern various degrees of knee OA, in comparison with plain radiography and the 'Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score' (KOOS) domains as comparators.METHOD: A cross-sectional study of MUS examinations in 45 patients with knee OA. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility were evaluated.RESULTS: MUS examination for knee OA consists of five separate domains assessing (1) predominantly morphological changes in the medial compartment, (2) predominantly inflammation in the medial compartment, (3) predominantly morphological changes in the lateral compartment, (4) predominantly inflammation in the lateral compartment, and (5) effusion. MUS scores displayed substantial reliability and reproducibility, with interclass correlations coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.97 for the five domains. Construct validity was confirmed with statistically significant correlation coefficients (0.47-0.81, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: The MUS score suggested in this study was reliable and valid in detecting knee OA. In comparison with standing radiographs of the knees, the score detected all aspects of knee OA with relevant precision.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To develop standardized musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS) procedures and scoring for detecting knee osteoarthritis (OA) and test the MUS score's ability to discern various degrees of knee OA, in comparison with plain radiography and the 'Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score' (KOOS) domains as comparators.METHOD: A cross-sectional study of MUS examinations in 45 patients with knee OA. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility were evaluated.RESULTS: MUS examination for knee OA consists of five separate domains assessing (1) predominantly morphological changes in the medial compartment, (2) predominantly inflammation in the medial compartment, (3) predominantly morphological changes in the lateral compartment, (4) predominantly inflammation in the lateral compartment, and (5) effusion. MUS scores displayed substantial reliability and reproducibility, with interclass correlations coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.97 for the five domains. Construct validity was confirmed with statistically significant correlation coefficients (0.47-0.81, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: The MUS score suggested in this study was reliable and valid in detecting knee OA. In comparison with standing radiographs of the knees, the score detected all aspects of knee OA with relevant precision.

U2 - 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.020

DO - 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.020

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25278077

VL - 22

SP - 1675

EP - 1691

JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

SN - 1063-4584

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 135226157