A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age: the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age : the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study. / Jensen, Rikke Beck; Thankamony, Ajay; O'Connell, Susan M; Kirk, Jeremy; Donaldson, Malcolm; Ivarsson, Sten-A; Söder, Olle; Roche, Edna; Hoey, Hilary; Dunger, David B; Juul, Anders.

I: European Journal of Endocrinology. Supplement, Bind 171, Nr. 4, 2014, s. 509-518.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, RB, Thankamony, A, O'Connell, SM, Kirk, J, Donaldson, M, Ivarsson, S-A, Söder, O, Roche, E, Hoey, H, Dunger, DB & Juul, A 2014, 'A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age: the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study', European Journal of Endocrinology. Supplement, bind 171, nr. 4, s. 509-518. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0419

APA

Jensen, R. B., Thankamony, A., O'Connell, S. M., Kirk, J., Donaldson, M., Ivarsson, S-A., Söder, O., Roche, E., Hoey, H., Dunger, D. B., & Juul, A. (2014). A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age: the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study. European Journal of Endocrinology. Supplement, 171(4), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0419

Vancouver

Jensen RB, Thankamony A, O'Connell SM, Kirk J, Donaldson M, Ivarsson S-A o.a. A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age: the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study. European Journal of Endocrinology. Supplement. 2014;171(4):509-518. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0419

Author

Jensen, Rikke Beck ; Thankamony, Ajay ; O'Connell, Susan M ; Kirk, Jeremy ; Donaldson, Malcolm ; Ivarsson, Sten-A ; Söder, Olle ; Roche, Edna ; Hoey, Hilary ; Dunger, David B ; Juul, Anders. / A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age : the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study. I: European Journal of Endocrinology. Supplement. 2014 ; Bind 171, Nr. 4. s. 509-518.

Bibtex

@article{38149f588ec4492398eb56a45ae6a102,
title = "A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age: the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Short children born small for gestational age (SGA) are treated with a GH dose based on body size, but treatment may lead to high levels of IGF1. The objective was to evaluate IGF1 titration of GH dose in contrast to current dosing strategies.METHODS: In the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study (NESGAS), 92 short pre-pubertal children born SGA were randomised after 1 year of high-dose GH treatment (67 μg/kg per day) to three different regimens: high dose (67 μg/kg per day), low dose (35 μg/kg per day) or IGF1 titration.RESULTS: The average dose during the second year of the randomised trial did not differ between the IGF1 titration group (38 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.019) and the low-dose group (35 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.002; P=0.46), but there was a wide variation in the IGF1 titration group (range 10-80 μg/kg per day). The IGF1 titration group had significantly lower height gain (0.17 SDS, s.d. 0.18) during the second year of the randomised trial compared with the high-dose group (0.46 SDS, s.d. 0.25), but not significantly lower than the low-dose group (0.23 SDS, s.d. 0.15; P=0.17). The IGF1 titration group had lower IGF1 levels after 2 years of the trial (mean 1.16, s.d. 1.24) compared with both the low-dose (mean 1.76, s.d. 1.48) and the high-dose (mean 2.97, s.d. 1.63) groups.CONCLUSION: IGF1 titration of GH dose in SGA children proved less effective than current dosing strategies. IGF1 titration resulted in physiological IGF1 levels with a wide range of GH dose and a poorer growth response, which indicates the role of IGF1 resistance and highlights the heterogeneity of short SGA children.",
keywords = "Aging, Body Height, Child, Child, Preschool, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Europe, Female, Human Growth Hormone, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Jensen, {Rikke Beck} and Ajay Thankamony and O'Connell, {Susan M} and Jeremy Kirk and Malcolm Donaldson and Sten-A Ivarsson and Olle S{\"o}der and Edna Roche and Hilary Hoey and Dunger, {David B} and Anders Juul",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2014 European Society of Endocrinology.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1530/EJE-14-0419",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "509--518",
journal = "Acta Endocrinologica, Supplement",
issn = "0804-4635",
publisher = "BioScientifica Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age

T2 - the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study

AU - Jensen, Rikke Beck

AU - Thankamony, Ajay

AU - O'Connell, Susan M

AU - Kirk, Jeremy

AU - Donaldson, Malcolm

AU - Ivarsson, Sten-A

AU - Söder, Olle

AU - Roche, Edna

AU - Hoey, Hilary

AU - Dunger, David B

AU - Juul, Anders

N1 - © 2014 European Society of Endocrinology.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: Short children born small for gestational age (SGA) are treated with a GH dose based on body size, but treatment may lead to high levels of IGF1. The objective was to evaluate IGF1 titration of GH dose in contrast to current dosing strategies.METHODS: In the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study (NESGAS), 92 short pre-pubertal children born SGA were randomised after 1 year of high-dose GH treatment (67 μg/kg per day) to three different regimens: high dose (67 μg/kg per day), low dose (35 μg/kg per day) or IGF1 titration.RESULTS: The average dose during the second year of the randomised trial did not differ between the IGF1 titration group (38 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.019) and the low-dose group (35 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.002; P=0.46), but there was a wide variation in the IGF1 titration group (range 10-80 μg/kg per day). The IGF1 titration group had significantly lower height gain (0.17 SDS, s.d. 0.18) during the second year of the randomised trial compared with the high-dose group (0.46 SDS, s.d. 0.25), but not significantly lower than the low-dose group (0.23 SDS, s.d. 0.15; P=0.17). The IGF1 titration group had lower IGF1 levels after 2 years of the trial (mean 1.16, s.d. 1.24) compared with both the low-dose (mean 1.76, s.d. 1.48) and the high-dose (mean 2.97, s.d. 1.63) groups.CONCLUSION: IGF1 titration of GH dose in SGA children proved less effective than current dosing strategies. IGF1 titration resulted in physiological IGF1 levels with a wide range of GH dose and a poorer growth response, which indicates the role of IGF1 resistance and highlights the heterogeneity of short SGA children.

AB - BACKGROUND: Short children born small for gestational age (SGA) are treated with a GH dose based on body size, but treatment may lead to high levels of IGF1. The objective was to evaluate IGF1 titration of GH dose in contrast to current dosing strategies.METHODS: In the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study (NESGAS), 92 short pre-pubertal children born SGA were randomised after 1 year of high-dose GH treatment (67 μg/kg per day) to three different regimens: high dose (67 μg/kg per day), low dose (35 μg/kg per day) or IGF1 titration.RESULTS: The average dose during the second year of the randomised trial did not differ between the IGF1 titration group (38 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.019) and the low-dose group (35 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.002; P=0.46), but there was a wide variation in the IGF1 titration group (range 10-80 μg/kg per day). The IGF1 titration group had significantly lower height gain (0.17 SDS, s.d. 0.18) during the second year of the randomised trial compared with the high-dose group (0.46 SDS, s.d. 0.25), but not significantly lower than the low-dose group (0.23 SDS, s.d. 0.15; P=0.17). The IGF1 titration group had lower IGF1 levels after 2 years of the trial (mean 1.16, s.d. 1.24) compared with both the low-dose (mean 1.76, s.d. 1.48) and the high-dose (mean 2.97, s.d. 1.63) groups.CONCLUSION: IGF1 titration of GH dose in SGA children proved less effective than current dosing strategies. IGF1 titration resulted in physiological IGF1 levels with a wide range of GH dose and a poorer growth response, which indicates the role of IGF1 resistance and highlights the heterogeneity of short SGA children.

KW - Aging

KW - Body Height

KW - Child

KW - Child, Preschool

KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug

KW - Drug Administration Schedule

KW - Europe

KW - Female

KW - Human Growth Hormone

KW - Humans

KW - Infant

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Infant, Small for Gestational Age

KW - Insulin-Like Growth Factor I

KW - Male

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1530/EJE-14-0419

DO - 10.1530/EJE-14-0419

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25080293

VL - 171

SP - 509

EP - 518

JO - Acta Endocrinologica, Supplement

JF - Acta Endocrinologica, Supplement

SN - 0804-4635

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 137740654