A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age: the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age : the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study. / Jensen, Rikke Beck; Thankamony, Ajay; O'Connell, Susan M; Kirk, Jeremy; Donaldson, Malcolm; Ivarsson, Sten-A; Söder, Olle; Roche, Edna; Hoey, Hilary; Dunger, David B; Juul, Anders.
I: European Journal of Endocrinology. Supplement, Bind 171, Nr. 4, 2014, s. 509-518.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomised controlled trial evaluating IGF1 titration in contrast to current GH dosing strategies in children born small for gestational age
T2 - the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study
AU - Jensen, Rikke Beck
AU - Thankamony, Ajay
AU - O'Connell, Susan M
AU - Kirk, Jeremy
AU - Donaldson, Malcolm
AU - Ivarsson, Sten-A
AU - Söder, Olle
AU - Roche, Edna
AU - Hoey, Hilary
AU - Dunger, David B
AU - Juul, Anders
N1 - © 2014 European Society of Endocrinology.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - BACKGROUND: Short children born small for gestational age (SGA) are treated with a GH dose based on body size, but treatment may lead to high levels of IGF1. The objective was to evaluate IGF1 titration of GH dose in contrast to current dosing strategies.METHODS: In the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study (NESGAS), 92 short pre-pubertal children born SGA were randomised after 1 year of high-dose GH treatment (67 μg/kg per day) to three different regimens: high dose (67 μg/kg per day), low dose (35 μg/kg per day) or IGF1 titration.RESULTS: The average dose during the second year of the randomised trial did not differ between the IGF1 titration group (38 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.019) and the low-dose group (35 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.002; P=0.46), but there was a wide variation in the IGF1 titration group (range 10-80 μg/kg per day). The IGF1 titration group had significantly lower height gain (0.17 SDS, s.d. 0.18) during the second year of the randomised trial compared with the high-dose group (0.46 SDS, s.d. 0.25), but not significantly lower than the low-dose group (0.23 SDS, s.d. 0.15; P=0.17). The IGF1 titration group had lower IGF1 levels after 2 years of the trial (mean 1.16, s.d. 1.24) compared with both the low-dose (mean 1.76, s.d. 1.48) and the high-dose (mean 2.97, s.d. 1.63) groups.CONCLUSION: IGF1 titration of GH dose in SGA children proved less effective than current dosing strategies. IGF1 titration resulted in physiological IGF1 levels with a wide range of GH dose and a poorer growth response, which indicates the role of IGF1 resistance and highlights the heterogeneity of short SGA children.
AB - BACKGROUND: Short children born small for gestational age (SGA) are treated with a GH dose based on body size, but treatment may lead to high levels of IGF1. The objective was to evaluate IGF1 titration of GH dose in contrast to current dosing strategies.METHODS: In the North European Small-for-Gestational-Age Study (NESGAS), 92 short pre-pubertal children born SGA were randomised after 1 year of high-dose GH treatment (67 μg/kg per day) to three different regimens: high dose (67 μg/kg per day), low dose (35 μg/kg per day) or IGF1 titration.RESULTS: The average dose during the second year of the randomised trial did not differ between the IGF1 titration group (38 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.019) and the low-dose group (35 μg/kg per day, s.d. 0.002; P=0.46), but there was a wide variation in the IGF1 titration group (range 10-80 μg/kg per day). The IGF1 titration group had significantly lower height gain (0.17 SDS, s.d. 0.18) during the second year of the randomised trial compared with the high-dose group (0.46 SDS, s.d. 0.25), but not significantly lower than the low-dose group (0.23 SDS, s.d. 0.15; P=0.17). The IGF1 titration group had lower IGF1 levels after 2 years of the trial (mean 1.16, s.d. 1.24) compared with both the low-dose (mean 1.76, s.d. 1.48) and the high-dose (mean 2.97, s.d. 1.63) groups.CONCLUSION: IGF1 titration of GH dose in SGA children proved less effective than current dosing strategies. IGF1 titration resulted in physiological IGF1 levels with a wide range of GH dose and a poorer growth response, which indicates the role of IGF1 resistance and highlights the heterogeneity of short SGA children.
KW - Aging
KW - Body Height
KW - Child
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
KW - Drug Administration Schedule
KW - Europe
KW - Female
KW - Human Growth Hormone
KW - Humans
KW - Infant
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Infant, Small for Gestational Age
KW - Insulin-Like Growth Factor I
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1530/EJE-14-0419
DO - 10.1530/EJE-14-0419
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25080293
VL - 171
SP - 509
EP - 518
JO - Acta Endocrinologica, Supplement
JF - Acta Endocrinologica, Supplement
SN - 0804-4635
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 137740654