A non-replicated experimental design in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) variety testing – Embracing plant density variation as a strength
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
A non-replicated experimental design in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) variety testing – Embracing plant density variation as a strength. / Jensen, Signe M.; Jørgensen, Johannes Ravn; Rasmussen, Jesper.
I: European Journal of Agronomy, Bind 148, 126851, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A non-replicated experimental design in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) variety testing – Embracing plant density variation as a strength
AU - Jensen, Signe M.
AU - Jørgensen, Johannes Ravn
AU - Rasmussen, Jesper
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Plant density is one of several factors that can affect crop yield. In conventional variety trials, it is generally assumed that the plant density is optimal and similar across all varieties, but in practice, field emergence and plant density may vary among varieties. In this study, we want to investigate an alternative experimental design that may help to reduce the part of the genotype x environment interactions caused by heterogeneity in plant density among varieties. We investigate the use of a non-replicated quantitative design adapted towards regression of yield on plant density by intentionally inducing variation in plant density on the cost of repetitions, and compare it to a conventional ANOVA-focused block design. Based on two field experiments and a simulation study, we show that the estimated yield accuracy is comparable between the two designs under the condition that plant density is similar across varieties. If plant density varies, the quantitative design provides the opportunity for crop yield adjustment. Furthermore, the quantitative design allows estimation of the yield potential, the optimal plant density, and the sensitivity to low plant densities for each variety. Across experiments, varieties, and years, the yield potential was 2.18 t/ha - 7.82 t/ha, the economically optimal net yield was 2.75 t/ha - 6.62 t/ha, and the economically optimal plant density was 39.8–67.7 plants m−2. The study demonstrates that the quantitative design provides added value compared to ordinary qualitative designs, by offering additional information such as the yield potential, optimal plant density,flowering and sensitivity measures.
AB - Plant density is one of several factors that can affect crop yield. In conventional variety trials, it is generally assumed that the plant density is optimal and similar across all varieties, but in practice, field emergence and plant density may vary among varieties. In this study, we want to investigate an alternative experimental design that may help to reduce the part of the genotype x environment interactions caused by heterogeneity in plant density among varieties. We investigate the use of a non-replicated quantitative design adapted towards regression of yield on plant density by intentionally inducing variation in plant density on the cost of repetitions, and compare it to a conventional ANOVA-focused block design. Based on two field experiments and a simulation study, we show that the estimated yield accuracy is comparable between the two designs under the condition that plant density is similar across varieties. If plant density varies, the quantitative design provides the opportunity for crop yield adjustment. Furthermore, the quantitative design allows estimation of the yield potential, the optimal plant density, and the sensitivity to low plant densities for each variety. Across experiments, varieties, and years, the yield potential was 2.18 t/ha - 7.82 t/ha, the economically optimal net yield was 2.75 t/ha - 6.62 t/ha, and the economically optimal plant density was 39.8–67.7 plants m−2. The study demonstrates that the quantitative design provides added value compared to ordinary qualitative designs, by offering additional information such as the yield potential, optimal plant density,flowering and sensitivity measures.
KW - Economically optimal plant density
KW - Economically optimal yield
KW - Genotype x environment
KW - Yield potential
U2 - 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126851
DO - 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126851
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85159092716
VL - 148
JO - European Journal of Agronomy
JF - European Journal of Agronomy
SN - 1161-0301
M1 - 126851
ER -
ID: 348242328