A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning. / Thomas, Benjamin; Warszawski, Jan; Falkner, Florian; Nagel, Sarah S; Schmidt, Volker J; Kneser, Ulrich; Bigdeli, Amir K.

I: Microsurgery, Bind 40, Nr. 5, 07.2020, s. 561-567.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Thomas, B, Warszawski, J, Falkner, F, Nagel, SS, Schmidt, VJ, Kneser, U & Bigdeli, AK 2020, 'A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning', Microsurgery, bind 40, nr. 5, s. 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30599

APA

Thomas, B., Warszawski, J., Falkner, F., Nagel, S. S., Schmidt, V. J., Kneser, U., & Bigdeli, A. K. (2020). A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning. Microsurgery, 40(5), 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30599

Vancouver

Thomas B, Warszawski J, Falkner F, Nagel SS, Schmidt VJ, Kneser U o.a. A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning. Microsurgery. 2020 jul.;40(5):561-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30599

Author

Thomas, Benjamin ; Warszawski, Jan ; Falkner, Florian ; Nagel, Sarah S ; Schmidt, Volker J ; Kneser, Ulrich ; Bigdeli, Amir K. / A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning. I: Microsurgery. 2020 ; Bind 40, Nr. 5. s. 561-567.

Bibtex

@article{83e3c6cf97594a5aa8da121f4a281b9b,
title = "A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap's vascular variability can lead to complications. Thus, the accuracy of numerous planning modalities has been studied. The clinical relevance of competing mapping methods, however, remains unknown. Therefore, we compared the impact of color-coded Duplex ultrasonography and handheld audible Dopplers on surgical efficacy and flap safety.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four ALT flaps were included in this comparative retrospective monocentric study. Twelve patients received Duplex scans and 32 flaps were designed using Dopplers only. Patient, defect, and flap characteristics of both groups were analyzed. The effect of either planning method on the primary outcome variables - flap harvest and operative times (HT, OT), course of perforator dissection, incidence of flap loss, emergent re-explorations, and donor-site revisions - was then assessed.RESULTS: Patient, defect, and flap characteristics were comparable between both groups, including flap size (Doppler: 134 ± 73 cm2 , Duplex: 131 ± 65 cm2 , p = .90). There was no flap loss. Emergent re-explorations (Doppler: 4/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .70) and donor-site revisions (Doppler: 2/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .81) were equally distributed. Duplex rendered septal perforator dissection 10 times more likely (Chi-Square = 8.9, p = .003, OR = 9.7), reaching 50% (n = 6/12), as opposed to only 9% in the Doppler cohort (n = 3/32). This allowed for highly significant HT and OT reductions of 89 minutes, respectively (p < .01): from 255 and 383 min (Doppler) to 166 and 294 min (Duplex).CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Duplex significantly reduces harvest and operative times of ALT flaps.",
keywords = "Humans, Perforator Flap/surgery, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Retrospective Studies, Thigh/surgery, Ultrasonography, Doppler",
author = "Benjamin Thomas and Jan Warszawski and Florian Falkner and Nagel, {Sarah S} and Schmidt, {Volker J} and Ulrich Kneser and Bigdeli, {Amir K}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1002/micr.30599",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "561--567",
journal = "International Journal of Microsurgery",
issn = "0738-1085",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of preoperative color-coded Duplex ultrasonography versus handheld audible Dopplers in ALT flap planning

AU - Thomas, Benjamin

AU - Warszawski, Jan

AU - Falkner, Florian

AU - Nagel, Sarah S

AU - Schmidt, Volker J

AU - Kneser, Ulrich

AU - Bigdeli, Amir K

N1 - © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap's vascular variability can lead to complications. Thus, the accuracy of numerous planning modalities has been studied. The clinical relevance of competing mapping methods, however, remains unknown. Therefore, we compared the impact of color-coded Duplex ultrasonography and handheld audible Dopplers on surgical efficacy and flap safety.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four ALT flaps were included in this comparative retrospective monocentric study. Twelve patients received Duplex scans and 32 flaps were designed using Dopplers only. Patient, defect, and flap characteristics of both groups were analyzed. The effect of either planning method on the primary outcome variables - flap harvest and operative times (HT, OT), course of perforator dissection, incidence of flap loss, emergent re-explorations, and donor-site revisions - was then assessed.RESULTS: Patient, defect, and flap characteristics were comparable between both groups, including flap size (Doppler: 134 ± 73 cm2 , Duplex: 131 ± 65 cm2 , p = .90). There was no flap loss. Emergent re-explorations (Doppler: 4/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .70) and donor-site revisions (Doppler: 2/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .81) were equally distributed. Duplex rendered septal perforator dissection 10 times more likely (Chi-Square = 8.9, p = .003, OR = 9.7), reaching 50% (n = 6/12), as opposed to only 9% in the Doppler cohort (n = 3/32). This allowed for highly significant HT and OT reductions of 89 minutes, respectively (p < .01): from 255 and 383 min (Doppler) to 166 and 294 min (Duplex).CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Duplex significantly reduces harvest and operative times of ALT flaps.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap's vascular variability can lead to complications. Thus, the accuracy of numerous planning modalities has been studied. The clinical relevance of competing mapping methods, however, remains unknown. Therefore, we compared the impact of color-coded Duplex ultrasonography and handheld audible Dopplers on surgical efficacy and flap safety.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four ALT flaps were included in this comparative retrospective monocentric study. Twelve patients received Duplex scans and 32 flaps were designed using Dopplers only. Patient, defect, and flap characteristics of both groups were analyzed. The effect of either planning method on the primary outcome variables - flap harvest and operative times (HT, OT), course of perforator dissection, incidence of flap loss, emergent re-explorations, and donor-site revisions - was then assessed.RESULTS: Patient, defect, and flap characteristics were comparable between both groups, including flap size (Doppler: 134 ± 73 cm2 , Duplex: 131 ± 65 cm2 , p = .90). There was no flap loss. Emergent re-explorations (Doppler: 4/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .70) and donor-site revisions (Doppler: 2/32, Duplex: 1/12, p = .81) were equally distributed. Duplex rendered septal perforator dissection 10 times more likely (Chi-Square = 8.9, p = .003, OR = 9.7), reaching 50% (n = 6/12), as opposed to only 9% in the Doppler cohort (n = 3/32). This allowed for highly significant HT and OT reductions of 89 minutes, respectively (p < .01): from 255 and 383 min (Doppler) to 166 and 294 min (Duplex).CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Duplex significantly reduces harvest and operative times of ALT flaps.

KW - Humans

KW - Perforator Flap/surgery

KW - Plastic Surgery Procedures

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Thigh/surgery

KW - Ultrasonography, Doppler

U2 - 10.1002/micr.30599

DO - 10.1002/micr.30599

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32369246

VL - 40

SP - 561

EP - 567

JO - International Journal of Microsurgery

JF - International Journal of Microsurgery

SN - 0738-1085

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 329563290